Delayed TME Surgery in a Watch-and-Wait Strategy After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Rectal Cancer: An Analysis of Hospital Costs and Surgical and Oncological Outcomes

被引:8
作者
Meyer, Vincent M. [1 ]
Meuzelaar, Richtje R.
Schoenaker, Ivonne J. H. [1 ]
de Groot, Jan-Willem B. [2 ]
Reerink, Onne [3 ]
Cappel, Wouter H. de Vos Tot Nederveen H. [4 ]
Beets, Geerard L. [5 ,6 ]
van Westreenen, Henderik L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Isala Hosp, Dept Surg, Postbus 10400, NL-8000 GK Zwolle, Netherlands
[2] Isala Hosp, Dept Oncol, Zwolle, Netherlands
[3] Isala Hosp, Dept Radiotherapy, Zwolle, Netherlands
[4] Isala Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, Zwolle, Netherlands
[5] Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Surg, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[6] Maastricht Univ, GROW Sch Oncol & Dev Biol, Maastricht, Netherlands
关键词
Complete clinical response; Delayed surgery; Rectal cancer; Regrowth; Salvage surgery; Watch and wait; PATHOLOGICAL COMPLETE RESPONSE; CHEMORADIATION THERAPY; CLINICAL-TRIAL; INTERVAL; COMPLICATIONS; IMPACT; TIME;
D O I
10.1097/DCR.0000000000002259
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: A watch-and-wait strategy for patients with rectal cancer with a clinical complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is a valuable alternative for rectal resection. However, there are patients who will have residual tumor or regrowth during watch and wait. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate safety and costs for patients who underwent delayed surgery after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study with prospectively collected data. SETTINGS: The study was conducted at a large teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Between January 2015 and May 2020, 622 new rectal cancer patients were seen, of whom 200 received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Ninety-four patients were included, 65 of whom underwent immediate surgery and 29 of whom required delayed surgery after an initial watch-and-wait approach. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcome measures included 30-day postoperative morbidity rate, hospital costs. 2-year overall and disease-free survival. RESULTS: There was no difference in length of stay (9 vs 8; p = 0.83), readmissions ( 27.6% vs 10.0%; p = 0.10), surgical re-interventions (15.0% vs 3.4%; p = 0.16), or stoma-free rate (52.6% vs 31.0%; p = 0.09) between immediate and delayed surgery groups. Hospital costs were similar in the delayed group ( pound 11,913 vs 13,769; pound p = 0.89). Two-year overall survival (93% vs 100%; p = 0.23) and disease-free survival (78% vs 81%; p = 0.47) rates were comparable. LIMITATIONS: Limitations included small sample size, follow-up time and retrospective design. CONCLUSION: Delayed surgery for regrowth in a watch-and-wait program or for persistent residual disease after a repeated assessment is not associated with an increased risk of postoperative morbidity or a significant rise in costs compared to immediate total mesorectal excision. There also appears to be no evident compromise in oncological outcome. Repeated response assessment in patients with a near complete clinical response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is a useful approach to identify more patients who can benefit from a watch-andwait strategy.
引用
收藏
页码:671 / 680
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The Role of Probe-Based Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy (pCLE) in the Diagnosis of Sustained Clinical Complete Response Under Watch-and-Wait Strategy After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Adenocarcinoma: a Score Validation
    Safatle-Ribeiro, Adriana Vaz
    Ribeiro Jr, Ulysses
    Lata, John
    Baba, Elisa Ryoka
    Lenz, Luciano
    da Costa Martins, Bruno
    Kawaguti, Fabio
    Moura, Renata Nobre
    Pennacchi, Caterina
    Gusmon, Carla
    de Lima, Marcelo Simas
    de Paulo, Gustavo Andrade
    Nahas, Caio Sergio
    Marques, Carlos Frederico
    Imperiale, Antonio Rocco
    Cotti, Guilherme C. C.
    Maluf-Filho, Fauze
    Nahas, Sergio Carlos
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2023, 27 (09) : 1903 - 1912
  • [42] The evaluation of follow-up strategies of watch-and-wait patients with a complete response after neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer
    Haak, Hester E.
    Zmuc, Jan
    Lambregts, Doenja M. J.
    Beets-Tan, Regina G. H.
    Melenhorst, Jarno
    Beets, Geerard L.
    Maas, Monique
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2021, 23 (07) : 1785 - 1792
  • [43] Impact of Perineural and Lymphovascular Invasion on Oncological Outcomes in Rectal Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy and Surgery
    J. A. Cienfuegos
    F. Rotellar
    J. Baixauli
    C. Beorlegui
    J. J. Sola
    L. Arbea
    C. Pastor
    J. Arredondo
    J. L. Hernández-Lizoáin
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2015, 22 : 916 - 923
  • [44] Nonoperative Management or 'Watch and Wait' for Rectal Cancer with Complete Clinical Response After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy: A Critical Appraisal
    Sammour, Tarik
    Price, Brandee A.
    Krause, Kate J.
    Chang, George J.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 24 (07) : 1904 - 1915
  • [45] Patient-Reported Bowel Function in Patients With Rectal Cancer Managed by a Watch-and-Wait Strategy After Neoadjuvant Therapy: A Case-Control Study
    Quezada-Diaz, Felipe F.
    Smith, J. Joshua
    Jimenez-Rodriguez, Rosa M.
    Wasserman, Isaac
    Pappou, Emmanouil P.
    Patil, Sujata
    Wei, Iris H.
    Nash, Garrett M.
    Guillem, Jose G.
    Weiser, Martin R.
    Paty, Philip B.
    Garcia-Aguilar, Julio
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2020, 63 (07) : 897 - 902
  • [46] Oncological outcomes of local excision compared with radical surgery after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Shaikh, Irshad
    Askari, Alan
    Ouru, Suzana
    Warusavitarne, Janindra
    Athanasiou, Thanos
    Faiz, Omar
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2015, 30 (01) : 19 - 29
  • [47] Improving the local excision strategy for rectal cancer after chemoradiotherapy: Surgical and oncological results
    Meillat, Helene
    Weets, Victoria
    Saadoun, Jacques-Emmanuel
    Tyran, Marguerite
    Mitry, Emmanuel
    Illy, Mathias
    de Chaisemartin, Cecile
    Lelong, Bernard
    EJSO, 2024, 50 (11):
  • [48] Wait-and-see or radical surgery for rectal cancer patients with a clinical complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a cohort study
    Li, Jun
    Liu, Hao
    Yin, Jie
    Liu, Sai
    Hu, Junjie
    Du, Feng
    Yuan, Jiatian
    Lv, Bo
    Fan, Jun
    Leng, Shusheng
    Zhang, Xin
    ONCOTARGET, 2015, 6 (39) : 42354 - 42361
  • [49] Efficacy and safety of wait and see strategy versus radical surgery and local excision for rectal cancer with cCR response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a meta-analysis
    Zhao, Guo-hua
    Deng, Li
    Ye, Dong-man
    Wang, Wen-hui
    Yan, Yan
    Yu, Tao
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 18 (01)
  • [50] A Diagnostic Biopsy-Adapted Immunoscore Predicts Response to Neoadjuvant Treatment and Selects Patients with Rectal Cancer Eligible for a Watch-and-Wait Strategy
    El Sissy, Carine
    Kirilovsky, Amos
    Van den Eynde, Marc
    Musina, Ana-Maria
    Anitei, Maria-Gabriela
    Romero, Alfredo
    Marliot, Florence
    Junca, Audelaure
    Doyen, Jerome
    Mlecnik, Bernhard
    Haicheur, Nacilla
    Fredriksen, Tessa
    Lagorce, Christine
    Jouret-Mourin, Anne
    Leonard, Daniel
    Bibeau, Frederic
    Iseas, Soledad
    Roca, Enrique L.
    Cabanne, Ana M.
    Vaccaro, Carlos A.
    Santino, Juan P.
    Huertas, Eduardo
    Tougeron, David
    Carvalho, Carlos
    Figueiredo, Nuno
    Perez, Rodrigo O.
    Habr-Gama, Angelita
    Scripcariu, Viorel
    Gerard, Jean-Pierre
    Galon, Jerome
    Zeitoun, Guy
    Pages, Franck
    CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2020, 26 (19) : 5198 - 5207