Delayed TME Surgery in a Watch-and-Wait Strategy After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Rectal Cancer: An Analysis of Hospital Costs and Surgical and Oncological Outcomes

被引:8
|
作者
Meyer, Vincent M. [1 ]
Meuzelaar, Richtje R.
Schoenaker, Ivonne J. H. [1 ]
de Groot, Jan-Willem B. [2 ]
Reerink, Onne [3 ]
Cappel, Wouter H. de Vos Tot Nederveen H. [4 ]
Beets, Geerard L. [5 ,6 ]
van Westreenen, Henderik L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Isala Hosp, Dept Surg, Postbus 10400, NL-8000 GK Zwolle, Netherlands
[2] Isala Hosp, Dept Oncol, Zwolle, Netherlands
[3] Isala Hosp, Dept Radiotherapy, Zwolle, Netherlands
[4] Isala Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, Zwolle, Netherlands
[5] Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Surg, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[6] Maastricht Univ, GROW Sch Oncol & Dev Biol, Maastricht, Netherlands
关键词
Complete clinical response; Delayed surgery; Rectal cancer; Regrowth; Salvage surgery; Watch and wait; PATHOLOGICAL COMPLETE RESPONSE; CHEMORADIATION THERAPY; CLINICAL-TRIAL; INTERVAL; COMPLICATIONS; IMPACT; TIME;
D O I
10.1097/DCR.0000000000002259
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: A watch-and-wait strategy for patients with rectal cancer with a clinical complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is a valuable alternative for rectal resection. However, there are patients who will have residual tumor or regrowth during watch and wait. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate safety and costs for patients who underwent delayed surgery after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study with prospectively collected data. SETTINGS: The study was conducted at a large teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Between January 2015 and May 2020, 622 new rectal cancer patients were seen, of whom 200 received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Ninety-four patients were included, 65 of whom underwent immediate surgery and 29 of whom required delayed surgery after an initial watch-and-wait approach. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcome measures included 30-day postoperative morbidity rate, hospital costs. 2-year overall and disease-free survival. RESULTS: There was no difference in length of stay (9 vs 8; p = 0.83), readmissions ( 27.6% vs 10.0%; p = 0.10), surgical re-interventions (15.0% vs 3.4%; p = 0.16), or stoma-free rate (52.6% vs 31.0%; p = 0.09) between immediate and delayed surgery groups. Hospital costs were similar in the delayed group ( pound 11,913 vs 13,769; pound p = 0.89). Two-year overall survival (93% vs 100%; p = 0.23) and disease-free survival (78% vs 81%; p = 0.47) rates were comparable. LIMITATIONS: Limitations included small sample size, follow-up time and retrospective design. CONCLUSION: Delayed surgery for regrowth in a watch-and-wait program or for persistent residual disease after a repeated assessment is not associated with an increased risk of postoperative morbidity or a significant rise in costs compared to immediate total mesorectal excision. There also appears to be no evident compromise in oncological outcome. Repeated response assessment in patients with a near complete clinical response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is a useful approach to identify more patients who can benefit from a watch-andwait strategy.
引用
收藏
页码:671 / 680
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Oncological Outcomes and Hospital Costs of the Treatment in Patients With Rectal Cancer: Watch-and-Wait Policy and Standard Surgical Treatment
    Hupkens, Britt J. P.
    Breukink, Stephanie O.
    Stoot, Jan H. M. B.
    Toebes, Renee E.
    van der Sande, Marit E.
    Melenhorst, Jarno
    Beets, Geerard L.
    Dirksen, Carmen D.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2020, 63 (05) : 598 - 605
  • [2] Survival outcomes of salvage surgery in the watch-and-wait approach for rectal cancer with clinical complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lin, Wenjie
    Wee, Ian Jun Yan
    Seow-En, Isaac
    Chok, Aik Yong
    Tan, Emile Kwong-Wei
    ANNALS OF COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2023, 39 (06) : 447 - 456
  • [3] “Watch and wait” strategy after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer: opportunities and challenges
    Yong Yang
    An Huang
    Zhuang Sun
    Hao-peng Hong
    Nam KYu Kim
    Jin Gu
    Holistic Integrative Oncology, 2 (1):
  • [4] Rectal cancer with complete clinical response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, surgery, or “watch and wait”
    Chien-Liang Lai
    Mei-Ju Lai
    Chang-Chieh Wu
    Shu-Wen Jao
    Cheng-Wen Hsiao
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2016, 31 : 413 - 419
  • [5] Rectal cancer with complete clinical response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, surgery, or "watch and wait"
    Lai, Chien-Liang
    Lai, Mei-Ju
    Wu, Chang-Chieh
    Jao, Shu-Wen
    Hsiao, Cheng-Wen
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2016, 31 (02) : 413 - 419
  • [6] Oncological risks associated with the planned watch-and-wait strategy using total neoadjuvant treatment for rectal cancer: A narrative review
    Socha, Joanna
    Glynne-Jones, Robert
    Bujko, Krzysztof
    CANCER TREATMENT REVIEWS, 2024, 129
  • [7] The watch-and-wait strategy versus radical resection for rectal cancer patients with a good response (≤ycT2) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
    Lee, Chungyeop
    Park, In Ja
    Lim, Seok-Byung
    Yu, Chang Sik
    Kim, Jin Cheon
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL TREATMENT AND RESEARCH, 2022, 103 (06) : 350 - 359
  • [8] A meta-analysis of the watch-and-wait strategy versus total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer exhibiting complete clinical response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
    Guilin Yu
    Wenqing Lu
    Zhouguang Jiao
    Jun Qiao
    Shiyang Ma
    Xin Liu
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology, 19
  • [9] Complete Response after Chemoradiotherapy in Rectal Cancer (Watch-and-Wait): Have we Cracked the Code?
    Glynne-Jones, R.
    Hughes, R.
    CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 28 (02) : 152 - 160
  • [10] Oncological and Survival Outcomes in Watch and Wait Patients With a Clinical Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Rectal Cancer A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis
    Dattani, Mit
    Heald, Richard J.
    Goussous, Ghaleb
    Broadhurst, Jack
    Sao Juliao, Guilherme P.
    Habr-Gama, Angelita
    Perez, Rodrigo Oliva
    Moran, Brendan J.
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2018, 268 (06) : 955 - 967