Cancer detection and complications in transperineal prostate biopsy, with antibiotics only when indicated

被引:6
|
作者
Boeve, Liselotte M. S. [1 ,5 ]
Bloemendal, Floride T. [1 ]
de Bie, Katelijne C. C. [1 ]
van Haarst, Ernst P. [1 ]
Krul, Eveline J. T. [2 ]
de Bruijn, Julia J. [1 ]
Beems, Sophie [3 ]
Vanhommerig, Joost W. [4 ]
Hovius, Marina C. [1 ]
Ruiter, Annebeth E. C. [1 ]
Lagerveld, Brunolf W. [1 ]
van Andel, George [1 ]
机构
[1] OLVG, Dept Urol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] OLVG, Dept Radiol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] OLVG, Dept Value Based Hlth, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] OLVG, Dept Res & Epidemiol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] OLVG, Dept Urol, POB 95500, NL-1090 HM Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
prostate cancer; perineal prostate biopsy; diagnostic evaluation; complications;
D O I
10.1111/bju.16041
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives To describe the prostate cancer (PCa) detection rate, including clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa), in a large cohort of patients who underwent transperineal ultrasonography-guided systematic prostate biopsy (TPB-US) using a probe-mounted transperineal access system, with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) cognitive fusion in case of a Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System grade 3-5 lesion, under local anaesthesia in an outpatient setting. Additionally, to compare the incidence of procedure-related complications with a cohort of patients undergoing transrectal ultrasonographyguided (TRB-US) and transrectal MRI-guided biopsies (TRB-MRI). Patients and Methods This was an observational cohort study in men who underwent TPB-US prostate biopsy in a large teaching hospital. For each participant, prostate-specific antigen level, clinical tumour stage, prostate volume, MRI parameters, number of (targeted) prostate biopsies, biopsy International Society of Uropathology (ISUP) grade and procedure-related complications were assessed. csPCa was defined as ISUP grade >= 2. Antibiotic prophylaxis was only given in those with an increased risk of urinary tract infection. Results A total of 1288 TPB-US procedures were evaluated. The overall detection rate for PCa in biopsy-naive patients was 73%, and for csPCa it was 63%. The incidence of hospitalization was 1% in TPB-US (13/1288), compared to 4% in TRB-US (8/ 214) and 3% in TRB-MRI (7/219; P = 0.002). Conclusions Contemporary combined systematic and target TPB-US with MRI cognitive fusion is easy to perform in an outpatient setting, with a high detection rate of csPCa and a low incidence of procedure-related complications.
引用
收藏
页码:397 / 403
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] TRUS Biopsy vs Transperineal Biopsy for Suspicion of Prostate Cancer
    Chiu, Peter K. F.
    Ahmed, Hashim U.
    Rastinehad, Ardeshir R.
    UROLOGY, 2022, 164 : 18 - 20
  • [32] Biplanar or Monoplanar Prostate Biopsy: Should Transrectal and Transperineal Approaches be Combined for Prostate Cancer Detection?
    Zhou, Zeng
    Li, Tiewen
    Zhang, Yichen
    Zhou, Xuehao
    Wang, Xiaohai
    Cui, Di
    Zhu, Yiping
    Jiang, Chenyi
    Guo, Wenhuan
    Han, Bangmin
    Ruan, Yuan
    INTERNATIONAL BRAZ J UROL, 2025, 51 (02):
  • [33] LEARNING CURVE FOR TRANSPERINEAL ULTRASOUND/MRI FUSION BIOPSY FOR THE DETECTION OF PROSTATE CANCER
    Elkun, Yuval
    Dumke, Henry
    Wong, Vincent
    Bassily, Daniel
    Wong, Nathan
    Dixon, Christopher
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 207 (05): : E691 - E692
  • [34] Direct comparison between transrectal and transperineal extended prostate biopsy for the detection of cancer
    Kawakami, Satoru
    Yamamoto, Shinya
    Numao, Noboru
    Ishikawa, Yuichi
    Kihara, Kazunori
    Fukui, Iwao
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 14 (08) : 719 - 724
  • [35] FREEHAND ULTRASOUND-GUIDED TRANSPERINEAL PROSTATE BIOPSY WITHOUT ANTIBIOTICS
    Dibianco, John Michael
    Gomella, Patrick
    Cosner, Cristina
    Allaway, Mathew
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 201 (04): : E180 - E181
  • [36] Transperineal biopsy prostate cancer detection in first biopsy and repeat biopsy after negative transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy: the Victorian Transperineal Biopsy Collaboration experience
    Ong, Wee Loon
    Weerakoon, Mahesha
    Huang, Sean
    Paul, Eldho
    Lawrentschuk, Nathan
    Frydenberg, Mark
    Moon, Daniel
    Murphy, Declan
    Grummet, Jeremy
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 116 (04) : 568 - 576
  • [37] THE ROLE OF PROPHYLACTIC ANTIBIOTICS IN TRANSPERINEAL PROSTATE BIOPSY: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND METANALYSIS
    Basourakos, Spyridon
    Alshak, Mark
    Lewicki, Patrick
    Cheng, Emily
    Tzeng, Michael
    DeRosa, Antonio
    Allaway, Matthew
    Ross, Ashley
    Schaeffer, Edward
    Patel, Hiten
    Hu, Jim
    Gorin, Michael
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 207 (05): : E135 - E135
  • [38] Transperineal Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy versus Transperineal Template Prostate Mapping Biopsy in the Detection of Localised Radio-recurrent Prostate Cancer
    Kanthabalan, A.
    Abd-Alazeez, M.
    Arya, M.
    Allen, C.
    Freeman, A.
    Jameson, C.
    Kirkham, A.
    Mitra, A. V.
    Payne, H.
    Punwani, S.
    Ramachandran, N.
    Walkden, M.
    Emberton, M.
    Ahmed, H. U.
    CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 28 (09) : 568 - 576
  • [39] Prostate Cancer Detection Rate of Transperineal Prostate Biopsy: Cognitive vs Software Fusion, A Multicenter Analysis
    Hung, Michael
    Ross, Ashley E.
    Li, Eric, V
    Pavlovich, Christian P.
    Fletcher, Sean A.
    Gereta, Sofia
    Zhang, Tenny R.
    McClure, Timothy D.
    Allaf, Mohamad E.
    Schaeffer, Edward M.
    Hu, Jim C.
    UROLOGY, 2024, 186 : 91 - 97
  • [40] Transperineal versus transrectal prostate biopsy in prostate cancer detection: a systematic review with meta-analysis
    Garcia, C.
    Winter, M.
    Bergersen, P.
    Woo, H.
    Chalasani, V.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 117 : 38 - 38