The illusory truth effect leads to the spread of misinformation

被引:26
作者
Vellani, Valentina [1 ,2 ]
Zheng, Sarah [1 ,2 ]
Ercelik, Dilay [1 ,2 ]
Sharot, Tali [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Dept Expt Psychol, Affect Brain Lab, London WC1H 0AP, England
[2] Max Planck Univ Coll London, Ctr Computat Psychiat & Ageing Res, London WC1B 5EH, England
[3] MIT, Dept Brain & Cognit Sci, Cambridge, MA USA
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
Information-sharing; Illusory truth effect; Misinformation; Repetition; REPETITION; FAMILIARITY; MEMORY; FREQUENCY; BELIEFS;
D O I
10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105421
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Misinformation can negatively impact people's lives in domains ranging from health to politics. An important research goal is to understand how misinformation spreads in order to curb it. Here, we test whether and how a single repetition of misinformation fuels its spread. Over two experiments (N = 260) participants indicated which statements they would like to share with other participants on social media. Half of the statements were repeated and half were new. The results reveal that participants were more likely to share statements they had previously been exposed to. Importantly, the relationship between repetition and sharing was mediated by perceived accuracy. That is, repetition of misinformation biased people's judgment of accuracy and as a result fuelled the spread of misinformation. The effect was observed in the domain of health (Exp 1) and general knowledge (Exp 2), suggesting it is not tied to a specific domain.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] Gorilla in our midst: An online behavioral experiment builder
    Anwyl-Irvine, Alexander L.
    Massonnie, Jessica
    Flitton, Adam
    Kirkham, Natasha
    Evershed, Jo K.
    [J]. BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2020, 52 (01) : 388 - 407
  • [2] Arkes H.R., 1989, J BEHAV DECISION MAK, V2, P81, DOI [DOI 10.1002/BDM.3960020203, https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.3960020203]
  • [3] DETERMINANTS OF JUDGED VALIDITY
    ARKES, HR
    BOEHM, LE
    XU, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1991, 27 (06) : 576 - 605
  • [4] CREDIBILITY OF REPEATED STATEMENTS - MEMORY FOR TRIVIA
    BACON, FT
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN LEARNING AND MEMORY, 1979, 5 (03): : 241 - 252
  • [5] Barreto MD, 2021, REV ESC ENFERM USP, V55, DOI [10.1590/1980-220x-reeusp-2021-0007, 10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2021-0007]
  • [6] ON BELIEVING WHAT WE REMEMBER
    BEGG, I
    ARMOUR, V
    KERR, T
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF BEHAVIOURAL SCIENCE-REVUE CANADIENNE DES SCIENCES DU COMPORTEMENT, 1985, 17 (03): : 199 - 214
  • [7] REPETITION AND THE RING OF TRUTH - BIASING COMMENTS
    BEGG, I
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF BEHAVIOURAL SCIENCE-REVUE CANADIENNE DES SCIENCES DU COMPORTEMENT, 1991, 23 (02): : 195 - 213
  • [8] DISSOCIATION OF PROCESSES IN BELIEF - SOURCE RECOLLECTION, STATEMENT FAMILIARITY, AND THE ILLUSION OF TRUTH
    BEGG, IM
    ANAS, A
    FARINACCI, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 1992, 121 (04) : 446 - 458
  • [9] An initial accuracy focus prevents illusory truth
    Brashier, Nadia M.
    Eliseev, Emmaline Drew
    Marsh, Elizabeth J.
    [J]. COGNITION, 2020, 194
  • [10] Turning lies into truths: Referential validation of falsehoods
    Brown, AS
    Nix, LA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1996, 22 (05) : 1088 - 1100