Quality of YouTube Videos Related to Colorectal Cancer Screening

被引:3
作者
Kahlam, Aaron [1 ]
Pai, Suraj [2 ]
Kahlam, Jasneel [3 ]
Ahlawat, Sushil [4 ]
机构
[1] Rutgers New Jersey Med Sch, Internal Med, Newark, NJ 07103 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Internal Med, Sch Med, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[3] New York Inst Technol, Internal Med, Coll Osteopath Med, Old Westbury, NY USA
[4] Rutgers State Univ, Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Newark, NJ USA
关键词
adult gastroenterology; internet technologies; bowel cancer screening; colorectal cancer; patient education; BOWEL PREPARATION; INFORMATION; INTERNET;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.33684
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction YouTube, an unregulated video-sharing website, is the second most visited website on the internet. As more patients turn to the internet for information about colon cancer screening, it is important to understand what they are consuming online. Our goal was to evaluate YouTube videos about colon cancer screening to better understand the information patients are accessing. Methods We searched YouTube on October 28, 2020, using the following search terms sorted by relevance and view count: colonoscopy, colon cancer screening, virtual colonoscopy, colonoscopy alternatives, and cologuard. Videos longer than 10 minutes, not in English, and duplicates were excluded. Three evaluators graded each video using the DISCERN criteria. Numerical data were averaged into a composite score. Two-sided t-tests and one-way ANOVA tests were used to compare mean ratings between groups. Results Fifty videos were analyzed, with a total of 23,148,938 views, averaging 462,979 views per video. The average overall rating was 3.16/5. There was no difference between search methods, search terms, or presence of a physician. The average ratings for videos with gastroenterologists (3.08), other physicians (3.35), and non -physicians (3.09) were not significantly different. Videos without physicians had more views on average (1,148,677) compared to videos with gastroenterologists (157,846, p=0.013) or other physicians (35,730, p=0.013). Conclusion YouTube videos related to colon cancer screening were of good quality regardless of search terms, search methods, or presence of a physician. However, videos without physicians were viewed more frequently. Physicians should continue making videos that address deficits while increasing viewership.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   YouTube™ as a Source of Instructional Videos on Bowel Preparation: a Content Analysis [J].
Ajumobi, Adewale B. ;
Malakouti, Mazyar ;
Bullen, Alexander ;
Ahaneku, Hycienth ;
Lunsford, Tisha N. .
JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION, 2016, 31 (04) :755-759
[2]   A survey on colonoscopy shows poor understanding of its protective value and widespread misconceptions across Europe [J].
Amlani, Bharat ;
Radaelli, Franco ;
Bhandari, Pradeep .
PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (05)
[3]  
[Anonymous], Youtube Official Blog
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2021, 50 MOST VISITED WEBS
[5]   Analysis of YouTube(TM) videos related to bowel preparation for colonoscopy [J].
Basch, Corey Hannah ;
Hillyer, Grace Clarke ;
Reeves, Rachel ;
Basch, Charles E. .
WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2014, 6 (09) :432-435
[6]  
Bray F, 2018, CA-CANCER J CLIN, V68, P394, DOI [10.3322/caac.21609, 10.3322/caac.21492]
[7]   DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices [J].
Charnock, D ;
Shepperd, S ;
Needham, G ;
Gann, R .
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 1999, 53 (02) :105-111
[8]   Patients' use of the Internet for medical information [J].
Diaz, JA ;
Griffith, RA ;
Ng, JJ ;
Reinert, SE ;
Friedmann, PD ;
Moulton, AW .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2002, 17 (03) :180-185
[9]  
Discern online, US
[10]   Assessment of anxiety levels in patients during elective upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and colonoscopy [J].
Ersoz, Feyzullah ;
Toros, Ahmet Burak ;
Aydogan, Gulsen ;
Bektas, Hasan ;
Ozcan, Ozhan ;
Arikan, Soykan .
TURKISH JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2010, 21 (01) :29-33