Thermal and structural analysis of TCABR vacuum vessel during baking process

被引:0
作者
Marques, Pedro Leo Oliveira [1 ]
Pauletti, Ruy Marcelo de Oliveira [1 ]
Elizondo, Juan Iraburu [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Polytech Sch, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Phys Inst, Sao Paulo, Brazil
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
Tokamak; Vacuum vessel; Baking; Thermal stress; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1016/j.fusengdes.2024.114229
中图分类号
TL [原子能技术]; O571 [原子核物理学];
学科分类号
0827 ; 082701 ;
摘要
TCABR is a small-sized tokamak located at the University of Sao Paulo, in Brazil. It is planned to undergo an extensive upgrade, which includes a baking system. However, this tokamak wasn't designed considering baking as a possible wall conditioning technique. This paper analyzes whether a baking system with ohmic heating could in principle be installed on TCABR, considering the thermal stresses that it might produce on the vacuum vessel. An analytical steady-state heat transfer model was used to estimate the heat fluxes required to reach a target temperature of 200 degree celsius. Thermal and structural transient finite element method models were developed using ANSYS Workbench (R). The temperature distribution was used to calculate the thermal stresses, also considering the effects of gravity and vacuum pressure. The stresses produced in the vacuum vessel by baking were below the limit defined by the ASME stress code, but the graphite tiles' support rails reached stress values above their material's yield strength. The resulting temperature distribution was not uniform, with some regions far from the 200 degree celsius target. A redesign of the baking system will be required to reach a more uniform temperature field and avoid stresses above yield strength for some components.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   Optimized baking of the DIII-D vessel [J].
Anderson, PM ;
Kellman, AG .
18TH IEEE/NPSS SYMPOSIUM ON FUSION ENGINEERING, 1999, :535-538
[2]  
[Anonymous], ANSYS User's Manual
[3]  
ASME, 2007, Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section VIII - Rules for Construction of Pressure Vessels, Division 2 - Alternative Rules
[4]  
ASME, 2010, Boiler and PressureVessel Code, Section II - Materials, Part D - Properties (Metric)
[5]  
BEJAN A., 1995, Convection Heat Transfer
[6]  
Canal G., 2019, An Overview of the Upgrade of the TCABR Tokamak
[7]  
Cengel Y.A., 2009, Heat and Mass Transfer. A Practical Approach, V3rd ed.
[8]  
Cheetham A.D., 1980, The TCA Tokamak-Project Report 1979
[9]   Thermohydraulic design of the KSTAR vacuum vessel [J].
Cho, S ;
Im, KH ;
Chang, YC ;
Kim, JB ;
Yoon, BJ ;
Do, CJ ;
Her, NI ;
In, SR ;
Kim, KS ;
Kim, YC ;
Kwon, M ;
Lee, KH .
FUSION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2001, 58-59 :851-855
[10]  
Feldshteyn Y, 1995, SOFE '95 - 16TH IEEE/NPSS SYMPOSIUM ON FUSION ENGINEERING, VOLS 1 AND 2, P1311, DOI 10.1109/FUSION.1995.534468