Multi-criteria analysis applied to ranking rehabilitation strategies of water distribution networks

被引:3
|
作者
Brentan, Bruno [1 ,5 ]
Carpitella, Silvia [2 ]
Zanfei, Ariele [3 ]
Gabriel Souza, Rui [1 ]
Menapace, Andrea [3 ]
Meirelles, Gustavo [1 ]
Righetti, Maurizio [3 ]
Izquierdo, Joaquin [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Minas Gerais UFMG, Hydraul Engn & Water Resources Dept Sch Engn, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
[2] Calif State Univ Northridge, Dept Mfg Syst Engn & Management, Northridge, CA USA
[3] Free Univ Bozen Bolzano, Fac Engn, Bolzano, Italy
[4] Univ Politecn Valencia, Inst Multidisciplinary Math, Valencia, Spain
[5] Univ Fed Minas Gerais UFMG, Hydraul Engn & Water Resources Dept Sch Engn, Av Presidente Antonio Carlos, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
关键词
multi-criteria analysis; rehabilitation; TOPSIS; water distribution systems; MANAGEMENT; SUPPLIERS;
D O I
10.1002/mma.9704
中图分类号
O29 [应用数学];
学科分类号
070104 ;
摘要
Rehabilitation of water distribution systems is a complex task that water companies have to tackle continually to keep high-quality service. The larger and more complex the network, the harder to make decisions about the network maintenance strategy to be implemented. Considering pipe replacement as a strategy for water network rehabilitation, this work presents a combination of water distribution system analysis and multi-criteria analysis to rank alternatives for pipe replacement. A set of eight performance criteria is used to evaluate the rehabilitation alternatives. The Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) is herein adopted to rank the solutions, coupled with a final sensitivity analysis on criteria weights. The obtained results point out as pipe replacement is an essential strategy for rehabilitation since the eight evaluation criteria are improved. The sensitivity analysis shows the best solutions' robustness, with just a few variations in their position in the ranking. The most frequent best solution is then hydraulically evaluated, showing the real benefits of pipe replacement in terms of pressure deficit reduction.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A strategy of multi-criteria decision-making task ranking in social-networks
    Zhiyuan Shi
    Fei Hao
    The Journal of Supercomputing, 2013, 66 : 556 - 571
  • [32] Exploring rehabilitation needs and strategies for water distribution networks
    Herz, RK
    JOURNAL OF WATER SERVICES RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY-AQUA, 1998, 47 (06): : 275 - 283
  • [33] Applied multi-criteria ideal rehabilitation model for budget allocation across road infrastructure
    Yadollahi M.
    Zin R.
    International Journal of Innovation Science, 2011, 3 (04) : 193 - 202
  • [34] Path problem in multi-criteria ranking and generalization of AHP
    Liu, Kai-Di
    Pang, Yan-Jun
    Zhou, Shao-Ling
    Ma, Li-Tao
    Li, Wen-Guo
    Xitong Gongcheng Lilun yu Shijian/System Engineering Theory and Practice, 2015, 35 (04): : 973 - 983
  • [35] A Multi-Criteria Experimental Ranking of Distributed SPARQL Evaluators
    Graux, Damien
    Jachiet, Louis
    Geneves, Pierre
    Layaida, Nabil
    2018 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIG DATA (BIG DATA), 2018, : 693 - 702
  • [36] Multi-criteria ranking of chemicals for toxicological impact assessments
    Gregoris, Elena
    Roman, Marco
    Gambaro, Andrea
    Barbante, Carlo
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2018, 73 : 122 - 127
  • [37] Multi-criteria ranking of LEED healthcare criteria for designing green hospitals
    Cenani, Sehnaz
    Can, Gizem
    JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2025, 105
  • [38] Multi-criteria contingency ranking method for voltage stability
    Dester, Mauricio
    Castro, Carlos A.
    ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2009, 79 (01) : 220 - 225
  • [39] A new multi-criteria model for ranking chess players
    Kaczynska, Aleksandra
    Kolodziejczyk, Joanna
    Salabun, Wojciech
    KNOWLEDGE-BASED AND INTELLIGENT INFORMATION & ENGINEERING SYSTEMS (KSE 2021), 2021, 192 : 4290 - 4299
  • [40] Ranking of office lease options by multi-criteria methods
    Ginevičius R.
    Ginevičius T.
    Gedvilaite D.
    Stasiukynas A.
    Engineering Management in Production and Services, 2016, 8 (04) : 86 - 93