Major fungal postharvest diseases of papaya: Current and prospective diagnosis methods

被引:3
|
作者
Tan, Guang Heng [1 ]
Ali, Asgar [1 ]
Siddiqui, Yasmeen [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham Malaysia, Ctr Excellence Postharvest Biotechnol CEPB, Sch Biosci, Jalan Broga, Semenyih 43500, Selangor, Malaysia
[2] King Faisal Univ, Coll Sci, Dept Biol Sci, Al Hasa 31982, Saudi Arabia
关键词
Papaya; Postharvest loss; Fungal diseases; Detection techniques; Biosensors; STEM END ROT; CARICA-PAPAYA; 1ST REPORT; ELECTRONIC-NOSE; FRUIT ROT; STEMPHYLIUM-LYCOPERSICI; COLLETOTRICHUM-GLOEOSPORIOIDES; STRAWBERRY FRUIT; PLANT-PATHOGENS; MANGO FRUIT;
D O I
10.1016/j.cropro.2023.106399
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Papaya (Carica papaya) had become an important crop in Malaysia due to its health benefits and economic development such as food processing. However, it suffered a serious postharvest loss via poor handling during the postharvest chain, which promotes the growth and development of pathogens epiphytically and endophytically. Most postharvest diseases are fungal, and they can lead to irreversible changes in the fruit quality in papayaproducing countries including Malaysia. To reduce postharvest losses, early diagnosis and identification are recommended to detect the spread of the diseases while constructing effective postharvest management against them. Traditional diagnosis techniques are commonly used to detect causal agents by relying on visible observations as well as biochemical analysis. More advanced technologies are introduced using molecular and immunological approaches which provide sensitive and accurate identification of postharvest diseases. However, due to their pricing and effectiveness, biosensors are optimal for replacing the limitations of these conventional techniques for effective and user-friendly disease diagnosis on-field. Subsequently, postharvest control of papaya fruit could be opted to delay the disease establishment by understanding the pathogen's identity. This review assesses critically the progress that has been made in postharvest disease diagnosis in papaya. Prospective methods of diagnosis are also elaborated.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Current technologies to control fungal diseases in postharvest papaya (Carica papaya L.)
    Rodrigues, Juliana Pereira
    Coelho, Caroline Correa de Souza
    Soares, Antonio Gomes
    Freitas-Silva, Otniel
    BIOCATALYSIS AND AGRICULTURAL BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2021, 36
  • [2] ROLE OF BENZYLISOTHIOCYANATE IN RESISTANCE OF PAPAYA FRUIT TO POSTHARVEST FUNGAL DISEASES
    PATIL, SS
    TANG, CS
    HUNTER, JE
    PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 1971, 61 (08) : 905 - &
  • [3] POSTHARVEST DISEASES OF PAPAYA
    ALVAREZ, AM
    NISHIJIMA, WT
    PLANT DISEASE, 1987, 71 (08) : 681 - 686
  • [4] Current strategies, perspectives and challenges in management and control of postharvest diseases of papaya
    Tan, Guang Heng
    Ali, Asgar
    Siddiqui, Yasmeen
    SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE, 2022, 301
  • [5] Microbial Biocontrol of Postharvest Papaya Diseases
    Paull, Robert E.
    Chen, Nancy Jung
    HORTSCIENCE, 2014, 49 (09) : S262 - S262
  • [6] Fungal Diseases of Papaya and Their Management
    Rawal, R. D.
    II INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON PAPAYA, 2010, 851
  • [7] Essential oils on the control of postharvest diseases of papaya
    Da Silva, Adriane Maria
    Terao, Daniel
    Vilela, Elie s. d.
    Queiroz, Sonia claudia n. de
    Maia, Aline h. n.
    Fracarolli, Juliana aparecida
    ANAIS DA ACADEMIA BRASILEIRA DE CIENCIAS, 2025, 97 (01):
  • [8] CURRENT CONCEPTS IN PATHOLOGICAL DIAGNOSIS - FUNGAL DISEASES
    CHANDLER, FW
    WATTS, JC
    JOURNAL OF HISTOTECHNOLOGY, 1995, 18 (03) : 247 - 252
  • [9] Effect of fungicides on the control of postharvest diseases in papaya fruits
    Orozco-Santos, M.
    Garca-Mariscal, K.
    Nieto-Angel, D.
    Velazquez-Monreal, J.
    Vazquez-Jimenez, J.
    Robles-Gonzalez, M.
    PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 2011, 101 (06) : S133 - S133
  • [10] POSTHARVEST DISEASES OF PAPAYA REDUCED BY BIWEEKLY ORCHARD SPRAYS
    ALVAREZ, AM
    HYLIN, JW
    OGATA, JN
    PLANT DISEASE REPORTER, 1977, 61 (09): : 731 - 735