Student Demographics as Predictors of Risk Placements via Universal Behavioral Screening

被引:4
作者
Ormiston, Heather E. [1 ]
Renshaw, Tyler L. [2 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ Bloomington, Dept Counseling & Educ Psychol, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
[2] Utah State Univ, Psychol Dept, Logan, UT USA
关键词
Assessment; Social-emotional; Mental health services; Diversity; Social justice; MENTAL-HEALTH; AFRICAN-AMERICAN; DISPROPORTIONALITY; DISABILITIES; PERCEPTIONS; TRANSITION; VARIANCE; VALIDITY; SCHOOLS; BIAS;
D O I
10.1007/s12310-023-09603-z
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
Universal screening for social, emotional, and behavioral risk is an important method for identifying students in need of additional or targeted support (Eklund and Dowdy in School Mental Health 6:40-49, 2014). Research is needed to explore how potential bias may be implicated in universal screening. We investigated student demographics as predictors of being placed at risk via a teacher-report measure: the Social, Academic, and Emotional Behavior Risk Screener as reported by Kilgus et al. (in: Theodore J. Christ et al. (eds) Social, academic, and emotional behavior risk screener (SAEBRS), 2014). Results indicated student demographics, including sex, special education status, free/reduced price lunch status, and identification as a student of color, were statistically significant predictors across multiple SAEBRS risk placements. The predictive power of student demographics was meaningful when evaluated independently (i.e., when each characteristic was considered separately with each risk placement) as well as when evaluated relatively or dependently (i.e., when all characteristics were taken together as a set to predict each risk placement). We discuss findings in the context of implications for implementation of universal behavioral screening amidst potential bias and serving students with identified levels of social, emotional, and behavioral risk.
引用
收藏
页码:1076 / 1089
页数:14
相关论文
共 61 条
  • [1] Surveillance of Internalizing Behaviors: A Reliability and Validity Generalization Study of Universal Screening Evidence
    Allen, Amanda N.
    Kilgus, Stephen P.
    Burns, Matthew K.
    Hodgson, Caroline
    [J]. SCHOOL MENTAL HEALTH, 2019, 11 (02) : 194 - 209
  • [2] Gender bias and imbalance: girls in US special education programmes
    Arms, Emily
    Bickett, Jill
    Graf, Victoria
    [J]. GENDER AND EDUCATION, 2008, 20 (04) : 349 - 359
  • [3] Toward the Integration of Education and Mental Health in Schools
    Atkins, Marc S.
    Hoagwood, Kimberly E.
    Kutash, Krista
    Seidman, Edward
    [J]. ADMINISTRATION AND POLICY IN MENTAL HEALTH AND MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2010, 37 (1-2) : 40 - 47
  • [4] A Preliminary Investigation of Emotional and Behavioral Screening Practices in K-12 Schools
    Bruhn, Allison Leigh
    Woods-Groves, Suzanne
    Huddle, Sally
    [J]. EDUCATION AND TREATMENT OF CHILDREN, 2014, 37 (04) : 611 - 634
  • [5] A Review of Tier 2 Interventions Conducted Within Multitiered Models of Behavioral Prevention
    Bruhn, Allison Leigh
    Lane, Kathleen Lynne
    Hirsch, Shanna Eisner
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EMOTIONAL AND BEHAVIORAL DISORDERS, 2014, 22 (03) : 171 - 189
  • [6] Training away bias: The differential effects of counterstereotype training and self-regulation on stereotype activation and application
    Burns, Mason D.
    Monteith, Margo J.
    Parker, Laura R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 73 : 97 - 110
  • [7] Center on Multi-Tiered Systems of Support at the American Institutes for Research, 2019, TIPS INT INSTR TIER
  • [8] How Big is a Big Odds Ratio? Interpreting the Magnitudes of Odds Ratios in Epidemiological Studies
    Chen, Henian
    Cohen, Patricia
    Chen, Sophie
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS-SIMULATION AND COMPUTATION, 2010, 39 (04) : 860 - 864
  • [9] Dever B.V., 2016, The Journal of Negro Education, V85, P59
  • [10] STABILITY AND CHANGE OF BEHAVIORAL AND EMOTIONAL SCREENING SCORES
    Dever, Bridget V.
    Dowdy, Erin
    Raines, Tara C.
    Carnazzo, Katherine
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGY IN THE SCHOOLS, 2015, 52 (06) : 618 - 629