The role of economic freedom in achieving the environmental sustainability for the highest economic freedom countries: testing the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis

被引:3
作者
Bektur, Cisem [1 ]
机构
[1] Sakarya Univ, Fac Polit Sci, Dept Econometr, Esentepe Campus, Serdivan, Sakarya, Turkiye
关键词
Economic freedom; EKC hypothesis; Ecological footprint; Economic growth; Renewable energy; Environmental pollution; CO2; EMISSIONS; ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; STATIONARITY TEST; RENEWABLE ENERGY; GROWTH; DEMOCRACY; NATIONS; CANADA;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-023-29120-5
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In the study, the relationship between ecological footprint, economic freedom, renewable energy consumption, and economic growth is analysed under the scope of environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis. Here, fifteen countries with the highest economic freedom for the period 1996-2018 are selected to more clearly underline the impact of economic freedom on the environment and examined, i.e., Australia, Canada, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Germany, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Norway, Singapore, South Korea, Sweden, and Switzerland. The long-term relationship between the variables is examined using the panel cointegration test. According to the test results, it has been observed that the variables in the EKC model act together in the long run. According to the long-term estimation results, it is seen that economic freedom decreases the ecological footprint, namely, environmental degradation, in Canada, while it increases in Estonia. Furthermore, it is concluded that renewable energy reduces the ecological footprint in Australia, Denmark, Luxembourg, Norway, Singapore, and Switzerland. Nevertheless, it has been determined that the EKC hypothesis is valid for Canada, Denmark, and Singapore, but not for other countries.
引用
收藏
页码:67187 / 67196
页数:10
相关论文
共 59 条
  • [1] Adesina KS., 2019, J DEV AREAS, V53, P155, DOI [10.1353/jda.2019.0044, DOI 10.1353/JDA.2019.0044]
  • [2] How does political instability affect economic growth?
    Aisen, An
    Veiga, Francisco Jose
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2013, 29 : 151 - 167
  • [3] The influence of renewable energy and economic freedom aspects on ecological sustainability in the G7 countries
    Alola, Andrew Adewale
    Doganalp, Nihat
    Obekpa, Hephzibah Onyeje
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2023, 31 (02) : 716 - 727
  • [4] The role of economic freedom and clean energy in environmental sustainability: implication for the G-20 economies
    Alola, Andrew Adewale
    Alola, Uju Violet
    Akdag, Saffet
    Yildirim, Hakan
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2022, 29 (24) : 36608 - 36615
  • [5] American Heritage Foundation, 2010, IND EC FREED IEF
  • [6] Fishing grounds footprint and economic freedom indexes: Evidence from Asia-Pacific
    Amin, Sajjad
    Li, Chuang
    Khan, Yousaf Ali
    Bibi, Amina
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (04):
  • [7] Is free trade good for the environment?
    Antweiler, W
    Copeland, BR
    Taylor, MS
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2001, 91 (04) : 877 - 908
  • [8] Are we consuming too much?
    Arrow, K
    Dasgupta, P
    Goulder, L
    Daily, G
    Ehrlich, P
    Heal, G
    Levin, S
    Mäler, KG
    Schneider, S
    Starrett, D
    Walker, B
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2004, 18 (03) : 147 - 172
  • [9] The spillover effects of political risk, financial risk, and economic freedom on ecological footprint: Empirical evidence from Belt and Road Initiative countries
    Ashraf, Junaid
    [J]. BORSA ISTANBUL REVIEW, 2022, 22 (05) : 873 - 885
  • [10] Do technological innovation and urbanization mitigate carbon dioxide emissions from the transport sector?
    Awan, Ashar
    Alnour, Mohammed
    Jahanger, Atif
    Onwe, Joshua Chukwuma
    [J]. TECHNOLOGY IN SOCIETY, 2022, 71