Response to water-deficit following waterlogging varies among ecotypes of subterranean clover (Trifolium subterraneum ssp. yanninicum), a waterlogging-tolerant annual pasture legume

被引:0
|
作者
Enkhbat, Gereltsetseg [1 ,2 ,4 ,5 ]
Inukai, Yoshiaki [3 ]
Nichols, Phillip G. H. [1 ,2 ]
Pang, Jiayin [1 ,2 ]
Erskine, William [1 ,2 ]
Foster, Kevin J. [1 ,2 ]
Ryan, Megan H. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Australia, UWA Sch Agr & Environm, Perth, WA, Australia
[2] Univ Western Australia, Inst Agr, Perth, WA, Australia
[3] Nagoya Univ, Grad Sch Bioagr Sci, Nagoya, Japan
[4] Univ Western Australia, Sch Agr & Environm, 35 Stirling Highway, Perth, WA 6009, Australia
[5] Univ Western Australia, Inst Agr, 35 Stirling Highway, Perth, WA 6009, Australia
关键词
isoflavone content; phenotypic plasticity; root distribution; root nodule formation; soil moisture fluctuation; RADIAL OXYGEN LOSS; PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY; FLOODING TOLERANCE; ACQUISITION EFFICIENCY; INTERNAL AERATION; ROOT MORPHOLOGY; TRAITS; SOIL; CULTIVARS; DROUGHT;
D O I
10.1111/aab.12856
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
The pasture legume Trifolium subterraneum ssp. yanninicum L. is waterlogging tolerant, but water-deficit (WD) susceptible. The interactive effect of waterlogged (WL) and WD (soil moisture fluctuation [SMF]) results in a severe stress impact. We studied three diverse ecotypes to identify traits associated with adaptation to SMF. Ecotypes were established in a glasshouse with two treatments imposed at 21 days: well-watered (WW-WW; 80% field capacity [FC]) and WL to WD (WL-WD). For WL-WD, pots were WL for 28 days (Harvest I), and then transitioned to WD (drained to 40% FC) and maintained for 10 days (Harvest II). For shoot relative growth rates (RGR) at Harvest I, WL had relatively little impact, although there was a greater reduction for Ecotype A (80% of WW) than Ecotypes B (92%) and C (87%). However, between Harvests I and II, the impact of WL-WD varied among ecotypes with Ecotype A being less affected (75% of WW-WW) than Ecotypes B (57%) and C (63%). For root RGR at Harvest I, WL resulted in a greater reduction for Ecotype A (52% of WW) than Ecotypes B (77%) and C (74%), while for WL-WD between Harvests I and II, Ecotype A showed a large increase (117% of WW-WW) compared to Ecotypes B (95%) and C (87%). In conclusion, the response to WD following WL varied among ecotypes, which demonstrates contrasting adaptation responses to SMF unrelated to WL tolerance. High yield under WL together with capacity for rapid growth post-WL in a drying soil profile could enhance adaptation to SMF.
引用
收藏
页码:287 / 301
页数:15
相关论文
empty
未找到相关数据