Risk factors for recurrent common bile duct stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:5
|
作者
Wen, Ningyuan [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Yaoqun [1 ,2 ]
Cai, Yulong [1 ,2 ]
Nie, Guilin [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Sishu [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Shaofeng [1 ,2 ]
Xiong, Xianze [1 ,2 ]
Li, Bei [1 ,2 ]
Lu, Jiong [1 ,2 ]
Cheng, Nansheng [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Div Biliary Surg, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Res Ctr Biliary Dis, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[3] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Res Ctr Biliary Dis, Div Biliary Surg,Dept Gen Surg, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
prognostic factors; recurrent choledocholithiasis; endoscopic sphincterotomy; endoscopic papillary balloon dilation; choledocholithiasi; PAPILLARY BALLOON DILATION; ENDOSCOPIC MANAGEMENT; PROGNOSTIC-FACTORS; FOLLOW-UP; CHOLEDOCHOLITHIASIS; SPHINCTEROTOMY; BENIGN; STENTS;
D O I
10.1080/17474124.2023.2242784
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Common bile duct stones (CBDS) have a reported recurrence rate of 4%-24% after stone extraction. The most commonly applied stone extraction method is endoscopic cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify all available risk factors for recurrent CBDS following stone retraction. Research design and methods: A literature search of studies with case-control design was performed to identify potential risk factors for recurrent CBDS. The impact of different risk factors on stone recurrence was analyzed. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs and heterogeneity were calculated. Identified risk factors were graded as 'strong,' 'moderate,' or 'weak' after quality assessment. Results: A total of 46 studies discussing stone recurrence following ERCP treatment were included. CBD diameter >= 1.5 cm, sharp CBD angulation, multiple ERCP sessions, postoperative pneumobilia, history of CBD incision, and biliary stent placement were identified as strong risk factors; larger CBD diameter, periampullary diverticulum, mechanical lithotripsy, and history of cholecystectomy were identified as moderate. Other weak risk factors were also listed. Conclusions: In this comprehensive study, we identified 14 risk/protective factors for recurrent CBDS following ERCP. Pooled odds ratios were calculated and evaluated the quality of evidence. These findings may shed light on the assessment and management of CBDS.
引用
收藏
页码:937 / 947
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Saline Solution Irrigation of the Bile Duct after Stone Removal Reduces the Recurrence of Common Bile Duct Stones
    Endo, Ryoma
    Satoh, Akihiko
    Tanaka, Yu
    Shimoda, Fumiko
    Suzuki, Kaoru
    Takahashi, Kiichi
    Okata, Hideki
    Hiramoto, Keiichiro
    Kimura, Osamu
    Asonuma, Sho
    Umemura, Ken
    Shimosegawa, Tooru
    TOHOKU JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2020, 250 (03) : 173 - 179
  • [42] Various approaches of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration plus primary duct closure for choledocholithiasis:A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ming-Yan He
    Xia-Dong Zhou
    Hao Chen
    Peng Zheng
    Fa-Zhan Zhang
    Wei-Wei Ren
    Hepatobiliary&PancreaticDiseasesInternational, 2018, 17 (03) : 183 - 191
  • [43] Various approaches of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration plus primary duct closure for choledocholithiasis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    He, Ming-Yan
    Zhou, Xia-Dong
    Chen, Hao
    Zheng, Peng
    Zhang, Fa-Zhan
    Ren, Wei-Wei
    HEPATOBILIARY & PANCREATIC DISEASES INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 17 (03) : 183 - 191
  • [44] Comparison of endoscopic papillary large-balloon dilatation with endoscopic sphincterotomy in clearing large common bile duct stones: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Cheng, Chao-Ling
    Tang, Kung-Pei
    Cheng, Sheng-Wei
    Fang, Hua-Chen
    Shiue, Sheng-Jie
    Suk, Fat-Moon
    Lien, Gi-Shih
    Wu, Ming-Shun
    ADVANCES IN DIGESTIVE MEDICINE, 2022, 9 (04) : 221 - 228
  • [45] Comparison of endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation with and without a prior endoscopic sphincterotomy for the treatment of patients with large and/or multiple common bile duct stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Liu, Pan
    Lin, Huapeng
    Chen, Yuanyuan
    Wu, Yu-Shen
    Tang, Maocai
    Lai, Liang
    THERAPEUTICS AND CLINICAL RISK MANAGEMENT, 2019, 15 : 91 - 101
  • [46] ENDOSCOPIC TREATMENT OF DIFFICULT COMMON BILE DUCT STONES
    Katanuma, Akio
    Maguchi, Hiroyuki
    Osanai, Manabu
    Takahashi, Kuniyuki
    DIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPY, 2010, 22 : S90 - S97
  • [47] Risk factors for neuroendocrine neoplasms: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Leoncini, E.
    Carioli, G.
    La Vecchia, C.
    Boccia, S.
    Rindi, G.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2016, 27 (01) : 68 - 81
  • [48] Comparison of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography combined with laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients with gallbladder and common bile duct stones a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Lan, W. -F.
    LI, J. -H.
    Wang, Q. -B.
    Zhan, X. -P.
    Yang, W. -L.
    Wang, L. -T.
    Tang, K. -Z.
    EUROPEAN REVIEW FOR MEDICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2023, 27 (10) : 4656 - 4669
  • [49] Preoperative versus intraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients with gallbladder and suspected common bile duct stones: system review and meta-analysis
    Wang, Bin
    Guo, Zhenying
    Liu, Zhenjie
    Wang, Yuan
    Si, Yi
    Zhu, Yuefeng
    Jin, Mingjuan
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2013, 27 (07): : 2454 - 2465
  • [50] Is Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration Safe in Patients with Acute Cholangitis Caused by Common Bile Duct Stones? Results of a Systematic Review
    Bejaoui, Ines
    Maatouk, Mohamed
    Kbir, Ghassen Hamdi
    Karoui, Yasser
    Essid, Nada
    Ben Moussa, Mounir
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2025, 35 (01): : 55 - 64