Risk factors for recurrent common bile duct stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:5
|
作者
Wen, Ningyuan [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Yaoqun [1 ,2 ]
Cai, Yulong [1 ,2 ]
Nie, Guilin [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Sishu [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Shaofeng [1 ,2 ]
Xiong, Xianze [1 ,2 ]
Li, Bei [1 ,2 ]
Lu, Jiong [1 ,2 ]
Cheng, Nansheng [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Div Biliary Surg, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Res Ctr Biliary Dis, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[3] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Res Ctr Biliary Dis, Div Biliary Surg,Dept Gen Surg, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
prognostic factors; recurrent choledocholithiasis; endoscopic sphincterotomy; endoscopic papillary balloon dilation; choledocholithiasi; PAPILLARY BALLOON DILATION; ENDOSCOPIC MANAGEMENT; PROGNOSTIC-FACTORS; FOLLOW-UP; CHOLEDOCHOLITHIASIS; SPHINCTEROTOMY; BENIGN; STENTS;
D O I
10.1080/17474124.2023.2242784
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Common bile duct stones (CBDS) have a reported recurrence rate of 4%-24% after stone extraction. The most commonly applied stone extraction method is endoscopic cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify all available risk factors for recurrent CBDS following stone retraction. Research design and methods: A literature search of studies with case-control design was performed to identify potential risk factors for recurrent CBDS. The impact of different risk factors on stone recurrence was analyzed. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs and heterogeneity were calculated. Identified risk factors were graded as 'strong,' 'moderate,' or 'weak' after quality assessment. Results: A total of 46 studies discussing stone recurrence following ERCP treatment were included. CBD diameter >= 1.5 cm, sharp CBD angulation, multiple ERCP sessions, postoperative pneumobilia, history of CBD incision, and biliary stent placement were identified as strong risk factors; larger CBD diameter, periampullary diverticulum, mechanical lithotripsy, and history of cholecystectomy were identified as moderate. Other weak risk factors were also listed. Conclusions: In this comprehensive study, we identified 14 risk/protective factors for recurrent CBDS following ERCP. Pooled odds ratios were calculated and evaluated the quality of evidence. These findings may shed light on the assessment and management of CBDS.
引用
收藏
页码:937 / 947
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Laparoscopic Transcystic Versus Transductal Common Bile Duct Exploration: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Hajibandeh, Shahin
    Hajibandeh, Shahab
    Sarma, Diwakar Ryali
    Balakrishnan, Sankar
    Eltair, Mokhtar
    Mankotia, Rajnish
    Budhoo, Misra
    Kumar, Yogesh
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 43 (08) : 1935 - 1948
  • [32] Risk factors for cholecystectomy in patients with gallbladder stones after endoscopic clearance of common bile duct stones
    Lee, Kang-Moon
    Paik, Chang Nyol
    Chung, Woo Chul
    Kim, Jin Dong
    Lee, Cheong Rok
    Yang, Jin Mo
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2009, 23 (08): : 1713 - 1719
  • [33] Is early laparoscopic cholecystectomy after clearance of common bile duct stones by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography superior?: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Wu, Kun
    Xiao, Linking
    Xiang, Jifeng
    Huan, Lu
    Xie, Wei
    MEDICINE, 2022, 101 (45) : E31365
  • [34] Meta-analysis of single-stage versus two-staged management for concomitant gallstones and common bile duct stones
    Li, Zhi-Qing
    Sun, Ji-Xia
    Li, Bin
    Dai, Xue-Qiang
    Yu, An-Xing
    Li, Zhe-Fu
    JOURNAL OF MINIMAL ACCESS SURGERY, 2020, 16 (03) : 206 - 214
  • [35] Prognostic factors for intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct following surgical resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zeng, Di
    Li, Bei
    Cheng, Nansheng
    SURGERY TODAY, 2025, 55 (02) : 131 - 143
  • [36] Prophylactic cholecystectomy offers best outcomes following ERCP clearance of common bile duct stones: a meta-analysis
    Mc Geehan, Gearoid
    Melly, Conor
    O' Connor, Niall
    Bass, Gary
    Mohseni, Shahin
    Bucholc, Magda
    Johnston, Alison
    Sugrue, Michael
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND EMERGENCY SURGERY, 2023, 49 (05) : 2257 - 2267
  • [37] Advantages of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in common bile duct stones
    Li, Ke-Yue
    Shi, Cheng-Xian
    Tang, Ke-li
    Huang, Jian-zhao
    Zhang, De-lin
    WIENER KLINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2018, 130 (3-4) : 100 - 104
  • [38] Various Techniques for the Surgical Treatment of Common Bile Duct Stones: A Meta Review
    Shojaiefard, Abolfazl
    Esmaeilzadeh, Majid
    Ghafouri, Ali
    Mehrabi, Arianeb
    GASTROENTEROLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2009, 2009
  • [39] Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic bile duct exploration versus endoscopic sphincterotomy for concomitant gallstones and common bile duct stones A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Gao, Ying-chao
    Chen, Jinjun
    Qin, Qiyu
    Chen, Hu
    Wang, Wei
    Zhao, Jian
    Miao, Fulong
    Shi, Xin
    MEDICINE, 2017, 96 (37)
  • [40] Endoscopic Sphincterotomy with Large Balloon Dilation versus Endoscopic Sphincterotomy for Bile Duct Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Xu, Lei
    Kyaw, Moe Htet
    Tse, Yee Kit
    Lau, James YunWong
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 2015