Risk factors for recurrent common bile duct stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:5
|
作者
Wen, Ningyuan [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Yaoqun [1 ,2 ]
Cai, Yulong [1 ,2 ]
Nie, Guilin [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Sishu [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Shaofeng [1 ,2 ]
Xiong, Xianze [1 ,2 ]
Li, Bei [1 ,2 ]
Lu, Jiong [1 ,2 ]
Cheng, Nansheng [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Div Biliary Surg, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Res Ctr Biliary Dis, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[3] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Res Ctr Biliary Dis, Div Biliary Surg,Dept Gen Surg, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
prognostic factors; recurrent choledocholithiasis; endoscopic sphincterotomy; endoscopic papillary balloon dilation; choledocholithiasi; PAPILLARY BALLOON DILATION; ENDOSCOPIC MANAGEMENT; PROGNOSTIC-FACTORS; FOLLOW-UP; CHOLEDOCHOLITHIASIS; SPHINCTEROTOMY; BENIGN; STENTS;
D O I
10.1080/17474124.2023.2242784
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Common bile duct stones (CBDS) have a reported recurrence rate of 4%-24% after stone extraction. The most commonly applied stone extraction method is endoscopic cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify all available risk factors for recurrent CBDS following stone retraction. Research design and methods: A literature search of studies with case-control design was performed to identify potential risk factors for recurrent CBDS. The impact of different risk factors on stone recurrence was analyzed. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs and heterogeneity were calculated. Identified risk factors were graded as 'strong,' 'moderate,' or 'weak' after quality assessment. Results: A total of 46 studies discussing stone recurrence following ERCP treatment were included. CBD diameter >= 1.5 cm, sharp CBD angulation, multiple ERCP sessions, postoperative pneumobilia, history of CBD incision, and biliary stent placement were identified as strong risk factors; larger CBD diameter, periampullary diverticulum, mechanical lithotripsy, and history of cholecystectomy were identified as moderate. Other weak risk factors were also listed. Conclusions: In this comprehensive study, we identified 14 risk/protective factors for recurrent CBDS following ERCP. Pooled odds ratios were calculated and evaluated the quality of evidence. These findings may shed light on the assessment and management of CBDS.
引用
收藏
页码:937 / 947
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Optimal treatment for concomitant gallbladder stones with common bile duct stones and predictors for recurrence of common bile duct stones
    Lee, Seung Jae
    Choi, In Seok
    Moon, Ju Ik
    Choi, Yong Woo
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2022, 36 (07): : 4748 - 4756
  • [22] Common bile duct stones: management based on risk factors
    Hernandez, Joseraul
    Hidalgo, Carlos
    Ramirez, Ectorjaime
    Chavez, Gabriela
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2013, 28 : 898 - 898
  • [23] Recurrence of common bile duct stones after endoscopic clearance and its predictors: A systematic review
    Kozyk, Marko
    Giri, Suprabhat
    Harindranath, Sidharth
    Trivedi, Manan
    Strubchevska, Kateryna
    Barik, Rakesh Kumar
    Sundaram, Sridhar
    DEN OPEN, 2024, 4 (01):
  • [24] Clinical Impact of Common Bile Duct Angulation on the Recurrence of Common Bile Duct Stone: A Meta-analysis and Review
    Ryu, Seongyul
    Jo, Ik Hyun
    Kim, Seonhoo
    Kim, Yeon-Ji
    Chung, Woo Chul
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2020, 76 (04) : 199 - 205
  • [25] Is the End of the T-Tube Drainage Era in Laparoscopic Choledochotomy for Common Bile Duct Stones Is Coming? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Yin, Zi
    Xu, Kang
    Sun, Jian
    Zhang, Jianlong
    Xiao, Zhiyu
    Wang, Jie
    Niu, Haitao
    Zhao, Qiang
    Lin, Shangxiong
    Li, Yajie
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2013, 257 (01) : 54 - 66
  • [26] Risk factors of stone recurrence after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for common bile duct stones
    Peng Lujian
    Cheng Xianneng
    Zhang Lei
    MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (27) : E20412
  • [27] Ursodeoxycholic acid after common bile duct stones removal for prevention of recurrence A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Chen, Xun
    Yan, Xiao-Ru
    Zhang, Li-Ping
    MEDICINE, 2018, 97 (45)
  • [28] What is the better surgical treatment option for recurrent common bile duct stones?
    Park, Chi Young
    Choi, Sung Hoon
    Kwon, Chang-Il
    Cho, Jae Hee
    Jang, Sung Ill
    Lee, Tae Hoon
    Han, Joung-Ho
    Jeong, Seok
    Ko, Kwang Hyun
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL TREATMENT AND RESEARCH, 2020, 99 (06) : 329 - 336
  • [29] Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for elderly patients with choledocholithiasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhu, Jisheng
    Tu, Shuju
    Yang, Zhengjiang
    Fu, Xiaowei
    Li, Yong
    Xiao, Weidong
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2020, 34 (04): : 1522 - 1533
  • [30] Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for elderly patients with choledocholithiasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jisheng Zhu
    Shuju Tu
    Zhengjiang Yang
    Xiaowei Fu
    Yong Li
    Weidong Xiao
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2020, 34 : 1522 - 1533