Risk factors for recurrent common bile duct stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:5
|
作者
Wen, Ningyuan [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Yaoqun [1 ,2 ]
Cai, Yulong [1 ,2 ]
Nie, Guilin [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Sishu [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Shaofeng [1 ,2 ]
Xiong, Xianze [1 ,2 ]
Li, Bei [1 ,2 ]
Lu, Jiong [1 ,2 ]
Cheng, Nansheng [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Div Biliary Surg, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Res Ctr Biliary Dis, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[3] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Res Ctr Biliary Dis, Div Biliary Surg,Dept Gen Surg, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
prognostic factors; recurrent choledocholithiasis; endoscopic sphincterotomy; endoscopic papillary balloon dilation; choledocholithiasi; PAPILLARY BALLOON DILATION; ENDOSCOPIC MANAGEMENT; PROGNOSTIC-FACTORS; FOLLOW-UP; CHOLEDOCHOLITHIASIS; SPHINCTEROTOMY; BENIGN; STENTS;
D O I
10.1080/17474124.2023.2242784
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Common bile duct stones (CBDS) have a reported recurrence rate of 4%-24% after stone extraction. The most commonly applied stone extraction method is endoscopic cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify all available risk factors for recurrent CBDS following stone retraction. Research design and methods: A literature search of studies with case-control design was performed to identify potential risk factors for recurrent CBDS. The impact of different risk factors on stone recurrence was analyzed. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs and heterogeneity were calculated. Identified risk factors were graded as 'strong,' 'moderate,' or 'weak' after quality assessment. Results: A total of 46 studies discussing stone recurrence following ERCP treatment were included. CBD diameter >= 1.5 cm, sharp CBD angulation, multiple ERCP sessions, postoperative pneumobilia, history of CBD incision, and biliary stent placement were identified as strong risk factors; larger CBD diameter, periampullary diverticulum, mechanical lithotripsy, and history of cholecystectomy were identified as moderate. Other weak risk factors were also listed. Conclusions: In this comprehensive study, we identified 14 risk/protective factors for recurrent CBDS following ERCP. Pooled odds ratios were calculated and evaluated the quality of evidence. These findings may shed light on the assessment and management of CBDS.
引用
收藏
页码:937 / 947
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Advances in Risk Factors for Recurrence of Common Bile Duct Stones
    Wu, Yao
    Xu, Chen Jing
    Xu, Shun Fu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2021, 18 (04): : 1067 - 1074
  • [2] Risk Factors for Recurrent Common Bile Duct Stones After Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography
    Dai, Ting
    Qiu, Shengkui
    Qian, Junbo
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2023, 85 (01) : 83 - 89
  • [3] Size of recurrent symptomatic common bile duct stones and factors related to recurrence
    Chang, Jae Hyuck
    Kim, Tae Ho
    Kim, Chang Whan
    Lee, In Seok
    Han, Sok Won
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 25 (05) : 518 - 523
  • [4] Comparison of the efficacy of LTCBDE and LCBDE for common bile duct stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zheng, Bin
    Lu, Yixin
    Li, Erqi
    Bai, Ziyu
    Zhang, Kaiqian
    Li, Jian
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2025, 11
  • [5] Primary Recurrent Common Bile Duct Stones: Timing of Surgical Intervention
    Mansour, Subhi
    Kluger, Yoram
    Khuri, Safi
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE RESEARCH-CANADA, 2022, 14 (11): : 441 - 447
  • [6] Endoscopic Treatment of Large Bile Duct Stones: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
    Facciorusso, Antonio
    Gkolfakis, Paraskevas
    Ramai, Daryl
    Tziatzios, Georgios
    Lester, Janice
    Crino, Stefano Francesco
    Frazzoni, Leonardo
    Papanikolaou, Ioannis S.
    Arvanitakis, Marianna
    Blero, Daniel
    Lemmers, Arnaud
    Eisendrath, Pierre
    Fuccio, Lorenzo
    Triantafyllou, Konstantinos
    Gabbrielli, Armando
    Deviere, Jacques
    CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2023, 21 (01) : 33 - +
  • [7] Risk Factors for Recurrence of Symptomatic Common Bile Duct Stones after Cholecystectomy
    Oak, Ju Hyun
    Paik, Chang Nyol
    Chung, Woo Chul
    Lee, Kang-Moon
    Yang, Jin Mo
    GASTROENTEROLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2012, 2012
  • [8] Evaluation of risk factors for recurrent primary common bile duct stone in patients with cholecystectomy
    Yoo, Eun Soo
    Yoo, Byung Moo
    Kim, Jin Hong
    Hwang, Jae Chul
    Yang, Min Jae
    Lee, Kee Myung
    Kim, Soon Sun
    Noh, Choong Kyun
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2018, 53 (04) : 466 - 470
  • [9] The Rendezvous Technique for Common Bile Duct Stones: A Meta-Analysis
    Huang, Long
    Yu, Qing-sheng
    Zhang, Qi
    Liu, Ju-da
    Wang, Zhen
    SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2015, 25 (06) : 462 - 470
  • [10] Common bile duct stones management: A network meta-analysis
    Mohseni, Shahin
    Bass, Gary Alan
    Forssten, Maximilian Peter
    Martinez Casas, Isidro
    Martin, Matthew
    Davis, Kimberly A.
    Haut, Elliott R.
    Sugrue, Michael
    Kurihara, Hayato
    Sarani, Babak
    Cao, Yang
    Coimbra, Raul
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND ACUTE CARE SURGERY, 2022, 93 (05) : E155 - E165