Acoustic sensitivity analysis for 3D structure with constant cross-section using 2.5D singular boundary method

被引:1
|
作者
Wei, Xing [1 ]
Cheng, Xiaxi [1 ]
Chen, Dehong [1 ]
Chen, Shenshen [1 ]
Zheng, Hui [2 ]
Sun, Linlin [3 ]
机构
[1] East China Jiaotong Univ, Sch Civil Engn & Architecture, Jiangxi Key Lab Disaster Prevent Mitigat & Emergen, Nanchang 330013, Peoples R China
[2] Nanchang Univ, Inst Aerosp, Nanchang 330031, Peoples R China
[3] Nantong Univ, Dept Computat Sci & Stat, Nantong 226019, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Singular boundary method; 2; 5D; Sensitivity analysis; Direct differentiation method; Adjoint variable method; WAVE-PROPAGATION ANALYSIS; ELEMENT-METHOD; COLLOCATION METHOD; HELMHOLTZ; OPTIMIZATION; RADIATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.enganabound.2023.07.021
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
In this paper, a 2.5D singular boundary method (SBM) in conjunction with the direct differentiation method (DDM) and adjoint variable method (AVM) are formulated for the sensitivity analysis of 3D longitudinally invariant structures. The assumption of a constant cross-section in the longitude direction enables it possible to decouple the 3D system into 2D problems at every wavenumber, and thus makes it a 2.5D-problem. The 2D sensitivity problem is solved by a boundary-type method, SBM. The SBM solves a problem with a linear com-bination of the fundamental solutions with respect to boundary collocation points. The fundamental solution makes the SBM available for exterior problems without the artificial truncated boundary. The source singularity issue of fundamental solution is overcome by a simple analytical formula and its derivatives. Numerical ex-periments present the accuracy, efficiency and feasibility of the proposed methods, and indicate that the pro-posed methods can be considered as an effective alternative in 3D problems with a longitudinally invariant cross-section.
引用
收藏
页码:948 / 955
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] 2.5D singular boundary method for acoustic wave propagation
    Wei, Xing
    Luo, Wenjun
    APPLIED MATHEMATICS LETTERS, 2021, 112
  • [2] Singular boundary method for 2D and 3D acoustic design sensitivity analysis ®
    Cheng, Suifu
    Wang, Fajie
    Li, Po-Wei
    Qu, Wenzhen
    COMPUTERS & MATHEMATICS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2022, 119 : 371 - 386
  • [3] 2.5D singular boundary method for exterior acoustic radiation and scattering problems
    Fakhraei, Javad
    Arcos, Robert
    Pamies, Teresa
    Romeu, Jordi
    ENGINEERING ANALYSIS WITH BOUNDARY ELEMENTS, 2022, 143 (293-304) : 293 - 304
  • [4] A 2.5D boundary element formulation for modeling damped waves in arbitrary cross-section waveguides and cavities
    Mazzotti, M.
    Bartoli, I.
    Marzani, A.
    Viola, E.
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2013, 248 : 363 - 382
  • [5] Skeletonization of 3D Images using 2.5D and 3D Algorithms
    Khan, Mohd. Sherfuddin
    Mankar, Vijay H.
    Prashanthi, G.
    Sathya, G.
    2015 1ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NEXT GENERATION COMPUTING TECHNOLOGIES (NGCT), 2015, : 971 - 975
  • [6] 3D ACOUSTIC SHAPE SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS USING FAST MULTIPOLE BOUNDARY ELEMENT METHOD
    Zheng, C. J.
    Chen, H. B.
    Matsumoto, T.
    Takahashi, T.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL METHODS, 2012, 9 (01)
  • [7] Modified 2.5D singular boundary methods to deal with spurious eigensolutions in exterior acoustic problems
    Fakhraei, Javad
    Arcos, Robert
    Pamies, Teresa
    Liravi, Hassan
    Romeu, Jordi
    JOURNAL OF SOUND AND VIBRATION, 2023, 550
  • [8] Numerical Analysis of Acoustic Barriers with a Diffusive Surface Using a 2.5D Boundary Element Model
    Gajardo, C. Prieto
    Godinho, L.
    Amado-Mendes, P.
    Barrigon Morillas, J. M.
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL ACOUSTICS, 2015, 23 (03)
  • [9] DETERMINATION OF 3D SURFACE ROUGHNESS PARAMETERS BY CROSS-SECTION METHOD
    Rudzitis, J.
    Krizbergs, J.
    Kumermanis, M.
    Mozga, N.
    Ancans, A.
    Leitans, A.
    LATVIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICS AND TECHNICAL SCIENCES, 2014, 51 (02) : 60 - 64
  • [10] A geometrical method for migrating 3D or 2.5D seismic reflection data
    Pivot, F
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 1997, 24 (24) : 3321 - 3324