Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension: a systematic review and meta-analysis of safety and durability

被引:5
作者
Ronsini, Carlo [1 ,2 ]
Pasanisi, Francesca [1 ,2 ]
Cianci, Stefano [3 ]
Vastarella, Maria Giovanna [1 ]
Pennacchio, Marika [1 ,2 ]
Torella, Marco [1 ,2 ]
Ercoli, Alfredo [3 ]
Colacurci, Nicola [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Dept Woman Child & Gen & Specialized Surg, Naples, Italy
[2] Univ Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Dept Gynaecol & Obstet, Naples, Italy
[3] Univ Hosp G Martino, Dept Human Pathol Adult & Childhood G Baresi, Obstet & Gynecol Unit, Messina, Italy
来源
FRONTIERS IN SURGERY | 2023年 / 10卷
关键词
uterosacral ligament suspension; laparoscopy; minimally invasive surgery; mini-invasive surgery (MIS); vaginal; safety; VAGINAL VAULT SUSPENSION; PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE; UTERINE SUSPENSION; HYSTERECTOMY; OUTCOMES; COMPLICATIONS; COLPOPEXY; ANATOMY; REPAIR;
D O I
10.3389/fsurg.2023.1180060
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
IntroductionPelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a widespread condition affecting from 40% to 60% of women. Reconstructive vaginal surgeries are the most commonly performed procedures to treat POP. Among those, uterosacral ligament suspension (USLS), which is usually performed transvaginally, preserves pelvic statics and dynamics and appears to be an effective method. Laparoscopic USLS is a valid alternative to vaginal approach, and the aim of our review is to confirm its safety and feasibility and to compare clinical outcomes among the procedures.Materials and methodsFollowing the recommendations in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, we systematically searched the PubMed and Scopus databases in December 2022. We made no restriction on the publication year nor on the country. Data about POP-Q recurrence rate (RR), intraoperative and postoperative complications (graded according to Clavien-Dindo classification), readmission rate, and reoperation rate were collected and analyzed. We used comparative studies for meta-analysis.ResultsA total of nine studies fulfilled inclusion criteria: two articles were non-comparative retrospective observational studies, three more articles were comparative studies where laparoscopic USLS was confronted with other surgical techniques (only data of laparoscopic USLS were analyzed), and four were comparative retrospective cohort studies between laparoscopic and vaginal USLS procedures. The comparative studies were enrolled in meta-analysis. Patients were analyzed concerning perioperative risks and the risk of recurrence. The meta-analysis highlighted that there was no clear inferiority of one technique over the other.DiscussionLaparoscopic USLS is a technique with a low complication rate and low recurrence rate. Indeed, laparoscopic procedure allows better identification of anatomical landmarks and access to retroperitoneum. Moreover, efficacy over time and durability of Laparoscopic (LPS) USLS was also observed. However, these data should be weighed in light of the length of follow-up, which was in a very short range. Further, focused and prospective studies will be necessary to confirm this finding.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease
    Aarts, Johanna W. M.
    Nieboer, Theodoor E.
    Johnson, Neil
    Tavender, Emma
    Garry, Ray
    Mol, Ben Willem J.
    Kluivers, Kirsten B.
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2015, (08):
  • [2] Step by Step Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy with Uterine Arteries Ligation at the Origin
    Alletti, Salvatore Gueli
    Restaino, Stefano
    Finelli, Angelo
    Ronsini, Carlo
    Lucidi, Alessandro
    Scambia, Giovanni
    Fanfani, Francesco
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 27 (01) : 22 - 23
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2009, Obstet Gynecol, V114, P1156, DOI 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181c33c72
  • [4] Bilateral uterosacral ligament vaginal vault suspension with site-specific endopelvic fascia defect repair for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse
    Barber, MD
    Visco, AG
    Weidner, AC
    Amundsen, CL
    Bump, RC
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 183 (06) : 1402 - 1410
  • [5] Ureteral Compromise in Laparoscopic Versus Vaginal Uterosacral Ligament Suspension A Retrospective Cohort
    Barbier, Heather M.
    Smith, Margo Z.
    Eto, Chidimma U.
    Welgoss, Jeffrey A.
    Von Pechmann, Walter
    Horbach, Nicolette
    Gruber, Daniel D.
    [J]. Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, 2015, 21 (06): : 363 - 368
  • [6] Hysterectomy for Benign Conditions of the Uterus Total Vaginal Hysterectomy
    Byrnes, Jenifer N.
    Occhino, John A.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2016, 43 (03) : 441 - +
  • [7] Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension: a comprehensive, systematic literature review
    Campagna, Giuseppe
    Panico, Giovanni
    Lombisani, Andrea
    Vacca, Lorenzo
    Caramazza, Daniela
    Scambia, Giovanni
    Ercoli, Alfredo
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2022, 277 : 57 - 70
  • [8] Graphical Tools for Network Meta-Analysis in STATA
    Chaimani, Anna
    Higgins, Julian P. T.
    Mavridis, Dimitris
    Spyridonos, Panagiota
    Salanti, Georgia
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (10):
  • [9] Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension versus vaginal colposuspension using the Uphold Lite™ mesh system: clinical outcome and patient satisfaction
    Chill, Henry H.
    Gutman-Ido, Einat
    Navon, Ido
    Reuveni-Salzman, Adi
    Haj-Yahya, Rani
    Shveiky, David
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2021, 32 (06) : 1513 - 1518
  • [10] Robotic and laparoendoscopic single-site utero-sacral ligament suspension for apical vaginal prolapse: evaluation of our technique and perioperative outcomes
    Davila H.H.
    Gallo T.
    Bruce L.
    Landrey C.
    [J]. Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2017, 11 (2) : 171 - 177