The intermediary and threshold effect of green innovation in the impact of environmental regulation on economic Growth: Evidence from China

被引:45
作者
Wang, Fang [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Econ, Nanjing 210023, Peoples R China
关键词
Environmental regulation; Green innovation; Economic growth; Panel threshold effect; TECHNOLOGICAL-INNOVATION; ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; PRODUCTIVITY; COMPETITIVENESS; MATTER;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110371
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Behind the rapid economic growth, the problems of environmental pollution have gradually become prominent. Environmental regulation is an important means for the government to deal with environmental problems in economic development and promote the construction of ecological civilization. Using the provincial data of China from 2005 to 2020, this paper studies the intermediary effect and threshold effect of green innovation in the process of environmental regulation affecting economic growth. The stepwise regression model of intermediary effect shows that environmental regulation promotes green innovation significantly, which further promotes economic growth. The panel threshold regression model shows that when green innovation is below 7.984 (the second threshold), environmental regulation positively affects economic growth, and when green innovation exceeds the second threshold, their marginal effects weaken. Further research shows that there is the regional specific heterogeneity effect. This paper analysis from 4 regions of China. When green innovation exceeds a certain threshold (eastern threshold is 4.382, central threshold is 6.553, western threshold is 5.037, northeastern threshold is 5.347), it decreases the marginal impact effect each region. The research results can provide reference for the government to formulate reasonable policies to balance environment and economy.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 89 条
[1]   The Impact and Determinants of Environmental Taxation on Economic Growth Communities in Romania [J].
Andrei, Jean ;
Mieila, Mihai ;
Popescu, Gheorghe H. ;
Nica, Elvira ;
Cristina, Manole .
ENERGIES, 2016, 9 (11)
[2]   Is free trade good for the environment? [J].
Antweiler, W ;
Copeland, BR ;
Taylor, MS .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2001, 91 (04) :877-908
[3]   Innovation Driven Economic Growth in Multiple Regions and Taxation: A Dynamic Analysis [J].
Batabyal, Amitrajeet A. ;
Beladi, Hamid .
INTERNATIONAL REGIONAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2014, 37 (04) :459-472
[4]   External knowledge sources, green innovation and performance [J].
Ben Arfi, Wissal ;
Hikkerova, Lubica ;
Sahut, Jean-Michel .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2018, 129 :210-220
[5]   Environmental regulation and productivity: Evidence from oil refineries [J].
Berman, E ;
Bui, LTM .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2001, 83 (03) :498-510
[6]   Linking environmental regulation and economic growth through technological innovation and resource consumption: Analysis of spatial interaction patterns of urban agglomerations [J].
Cao, Yu ;
Wan, Ningna ;
Zhang, Haiyong ;
Zhang, Xiaoling ;
Zhou, Qian .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2020, 112 (112)
[7]   The contribution of environmental regulation to technological innovation and quality competitiveness An empirical study based on Chinese manufacturing enterprises [J].
Cao, Yuhong ;
You, Jianxin .
CHINESE MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2017, 11 (01) :51-71
[8]  
Chen S., 2018, ERJ, V53, P20
[9]  
[程芳芳 Cheng Fangfang], 2020, [中国人口·资源与环境, China Population Resources and Environment], V30, P46
[10]   Environmental regulation and US states' technical inefficiency [J].
Chintrakarn, Pandej .
ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2008, 100 (03) :363-365