Interactive or tailored digital interventions to increase uptake in cervical, breast, and colorectal cancer screening to reduce health inequity: a systematic review

被引:5
|
作者
Richardson-Parry, Afua [1 ,7 ]
Silva, Mitchell [2 ]
Valderas, Jose M. [3 ,4 ]
Donde, Shaantanu [1 ]
Woodruff, Seth [5 ]
van Vugt, Joris [6 ]
机构
[1] European Developed Markets Med Affairs Viatris, Hatfield, England
[2] Esperity, Innovat, Brussels, Belgium
[3] Natl Univ Hlth Syst, Dept Family Med, Singapore, Singapore
[4] Yong Loo Lin Sch Med, Ctr Res Hlth Syst Performance, Singapore, Singapore
[5] Viatris, North Amer Med Affairs, New York, NY USA
[6] Viatris, Med Affairs, Amstelveen, Netherlands
[7] Viatris, Bldg 4,Trident Pl,Mosquito Way, Hatfield AL10 9UL, England
关键词
apps; breast cancer; cancer screening; cervical cancer; colorectal cancer; digital health; health equity; health inequality; mammography; multimedia; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; EDUCATION INTERVENTION; AMERICAN WOMEN; MAMMOGRAPHY; CARE; DISPARITIES; LITERACY; PROSTATE;
D O I
10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000796
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and objectivesSignificant health inequities exist in screening uptake for certain types of cancer. The review question was to identify and describe interactive, tailored digital, computer, and web-based interventions to reduce health inequity in cancer screening and review the effectiveness of such interventions in increasing screening rates versus usual care. MethodsWe searched four medical literature databases for randomized control trials (RCTs) published until 12 January 2023 that evaluated interventions aimed at increasing the percentage of breast, prostate, cervical, or colorectal cancer screening uptake. Meta-analysis was not conducted due to heterogeneity among studies. ResultsAfter screening 4200 titles and abstracts, 17 studies were included. Studies focused on colorectal (n = 10), breast (n = 4), cervical (n = 2), and prostate (n = 1) cancer screening. All were based in the USA except two. Most studies focused on ethnicity/race, while some included low-income populations. Intervention types were heterogeneous and used computer programs, apps, or web-based methods to provide tailored or interactive information to participants about screening risks and options. Some studies found positive effects for increasing cancer screening uptake in the intervention groups compared to usual care, but results were heterogeneous. ConclusionInterventions that use individual and cultural tailoring of cancer screening educational material should be further developed and investigated outside of the USA. Designing effective digital intervention strategies, with components that can be adapted to remote delivery may be an important strategy for reducing health inequities in cancer screening during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.
引用
收藏
页码:396 / 409
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The health belief model and colorectal cancer screening in the general population: A systematic review
    Lau, Jerrald
    Lim, Tian-Zhi
    Wong, Gretel Jianlin
    Tan, Ker-Kan
    PREVENTIVE MEDICINE REPORTS, 2020, 20
  • [32] Promoting colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of interventions to increase uptake
    Tsipa, Anastasia
    O'Connor, Daryl B.
    Branley-Bell, Dawn
    Day, Fiona
    Hall, Louise H.
    Sykes-Muskett, Bianca
    Wilding, Sarah
    Taylor, Natalie
    Conner, Mark
    HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2021, 15 (03) : 371 - 394
  • [33] Cervical Cancer Screening Interventions for US Latinas: A Systematic Review
    Corcoran, Jacqueline
    Dattalo, Patrick
    Crowley, Meghan
    HEALTH & SOCIAL WORK, 2012, 37 (04) : 197 - 205
  • [34] How is equity captured for colorectal, breast and cervical cancer incidence and screening in the Republic of Ireland: A review
    Symmons, Sophie Mulcahy
    Leavy, Paul
    Heavey, Laura
    Mohan, Caroline Mason
    Drury, Amanda
    De Brin, Aoife
    PREVENTIVE MEDICINE REPORTS, 2023, 36
  • [35] Effect of Behavioral Interventions on the Uptake of Colonoscopy for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Yakoubovitch, Stephanie
    Zaki, Timothy
    Anand, Sanya
    Pecoriello, Jillian
    Liang, Peter S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2023, 118 (10) : 1829 - 1840
  • [36] Cancer worries and uptake of breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening: A population-based survey in England
    Quaife, Samantha L.
    Waller, Jo
    von Wagner, Christian
    Vrinten, Charlotte
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2019, 26 (01) : 3 - 10
  • [37] Barriers and enablers of uptake and adherence to digital health interventions in older patients with cancer: A systematic review
    Hasnan, Syarafina
    Aggarwal, Samuel
    Mohammadi, Leila
    Koczwara, Bogda
    JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC ONCOLOGY, 2022, 13 (08) : 1084 - 1091
  • [38] Interventions to increase cervical screening uptake among immigrant women: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Alam, Zufishan
    Cairns, Joanne Marie
    Scott, Marissa
    Dean, Judith Ann
    Janda, Monika
    PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (06):
  • [39] Interventions to Reduce Healthcare Disparities in Cancer Screening Among Minority Adults: a Systematic Review
    Liu, Darren
    Schuchard, Hayley
    Burston, Betty
    Yamashita, Takashi
    Albert, Steven
    JOURNAL OF RACIAL AND ETHNIC HEALTH DISPARITIES, 2021, 8 (01) : 107 - 126
  • [40] A Systematic Review of Interventions to Promote Cervical Cancer Screening among Immigrant Vietnamese Women
    Hua, Jacqueline
    Jackson, Kristopher
    JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2025, 50 (01) : 187 - 198