Interactive or tailored digital interventions to increase uptake in cervical, breast, and colorectal cancer screening to reduce health inequity: a systematic review

被引:5
|
作者
Richardson-Parry, Afua [1 ,7 ]
Silva, Mitchell [2 ]
Valderas, Jose M. [3 ,4 ]
Donde, Shaantanu [1 ]
Woodruff, Seth [5 ]
van Vugt, Joris [6 ]
机构
[1] European Developed Markets Med Affairs Viatris, Hatfield, England
[2] Esperity, Innovat, Brussels, Belgium
[3] Natl Univ Hlth Syst, Dept Family Med, Singapore, Singapore
[4] Yong Loo Lin Sch Med, Ctr Res Hlth Syst Performance, Singapore, Singapore
[5] Viatris, North Amer Med Affairs, New York, NY USA
[6] Viatris, Med Affairs, Amstelveen, Netherlands
[7] Viatris, Bldg 4,Trident Pl,Mosquito Way, Hatfield AL10 9UL, England
关键词
apps; breast cancer; cancer screening; cervical cancer; colorectal cancer; digital health; health equity; health inequality; mammography; multimedia; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; EDUCATION INTERVENTION; AMERICAN WOMEN; MAMMOGRAPHY; CARE; DISPARITIES; LITERACY; PROSTATE;
D O I
10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000796
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and objectivesSignificant health inequities exist in screening uptake for certain types of cancer. The review question was to identify and describe interactive, tailored digital, computer, and web-based interventions to reduce health inequity in cancer screening and review the effectiveness of such interventions in increasing screening rates versus usual care. MethodsWe searched four medical literature databases for randomized control trials (RCTs) published until 12 January 2023 that evaluated interventions aimed at increasing the percentage of breast, prostate, cervical, or colorectal cancer screening uptake. Meta-analysis was not conducted due to heterogeneity among studies. ResultsAfter screening 4200 titles and abstracts, 17 studies were included. Studies focused on colorectal (n = 10), breast (n = 4), cervical (n = 2), and prostate (n = 1) cancer screening. All were based in the USA except two. Most studies focused on ethnicity/race, while some included low-income populations. Intervention types were heterogeneous and used computer programs, apps, or web-based methods to provide tailored or interactive information to participants about screening risks and options. Some studies found positive effects for increasing cancer screening uptake in the intervention groups compared to usual care, but results were heterogeneous. ConclusionInterventions that use individual and cultural tailoring of cancer screening educational material should be further developed and investigated outside of the USA. Designing effective digital intervention strategies, with components that can be adapted to remote delivery may be an important strategy for reducing health inequities in cancer screening during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.
引用
收藏
页码:396 / 409
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Population health interventions to improve colorectal cancer screening by fecal immunochemical tests: A systematic review
    Issaka, Rachel B.
    Avila, Patrick
    Whitaker, Evans
    Bent, Stephen
    Somsouk, Ma
    PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2019, 118 : 113 - 121
  • [22] The breast cancer paradox: A systematic review of the association between area-level deprivation and breast cancer screening uptake in Europe
    Smith, Dinah
    Thomson, Katie
    Bambra, Clare
    Todd, Adam
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2019, 60 : 77 - 85
  • [23] Effective interventions to facilitate the uptake of breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening: an implementation guideline
    Melissa C Brouwers
    Carol De Vito
    Lavannya Bahirathan
    Angela Carol
    June C Carroll
    Michelle Cotterchio
    Maureen Dobbins
    Barbara Lent
    Cheryl Levitt
    Nancy Lewis
    S Elizabeth McGregor
    Lawrence Paszat
    Carol Rand
    Nadine Wathen
    Implementation Science, 6
  • [24] Breast and cervical cancer screening services in Malawi: a systematic review
    Pittalis, Chiara
    Panteli, Emily
    Schouten, Erik
    Magongwa, Irene
    Gajewski, Jakub
    BMC CANCER, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [25] Breast and cervical cancer screening services in Malawi: a systematic review
    Chiara Pittalis
    Emily Panteli
    Erik Schouten
    Irene Magongwa
    Jakub Gajewski
    BMC Cancer, 20
  • [26] What implementation interventions increase cancer screening rates? a systematic review
    Brouwers, Melissa C.
    De Vito, Carol
    Bahirathan, Lavannya
    Carol, Angela
    Carroll, June C.
    Cotterchio, Michelle
    Dobbins, Maureen
    Lent, Barbara
    Levitt, Cheryl
    Lewis, Nancy
    McGregor, S. Elizabeth
    Paszat, Lawrence
    Rand, Carol
    Wathen, Nadine
    IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2011, 6
  • [27] Sociocultural factors influencing women’s adherence to colorectal, breast, and cervical cancer screening: a systematic review
    Ghaneshinee Sathiyaseelan
    Syahnaz Mohd Hashim
    Azmawati Mohammed Nawi
    BMC Public Health, 25 (1)
  • [28] Patient Navigation Increases Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Immigrants in the US: A Systematic Review
    Jang, Jeffrey
    Sun, Kennedy H.
    Mann, Katherine
    Barrett, Emmalee
    Khilnani, Aneka
    Harrod, Thomas
    Phillips, Serena
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2025,
  • [29] Advancing Mammographic Screening Among Underserved Groups: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Intervention Strategies to Increase Breast Cancer Screening Uptake
    Ferrari, Allegra
    Herrera, Deborah Jael
    van de Veerdonk, Wessel
    D'haenens, Wendy
    Alejos, Andrea Ruiz
    Yimer, Nigus Bililign
    Orwa, Sheila
    Van Bos, Liesbet
    Talboom, Sarah
    Ding, Lilu
    Goossens, Mathieu
    Van Hal, Guido
    PUBLIC HEALTH REVIEWS, 2025, 46
  • [30] Electronic Health Interventions and Cervical Cancer Screening:Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Liu, Xiaoxia
    Ning, Lianzhen
    Fan, Wenqi
    Jia, Chanyi
    Ge, Lina
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2024, 26