Engaging citizens in land use policy in the smart city context

被引:10
作者
Kedra, Arleta [1 ]
Maleszyk, Piotr [1 ]
Visvizi, Anna [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Maria Curie Sklodowska Univ Lublin, Pl Marii Curie Sklodowskiej 5, PL-20031 Lublin, Poland
[2] SGH Warsaw Sch Econ, Al Niepodleglosci 162, PL-02554 Warsaw, Poland
[3] Effat Univ, Effat Coll Business, Jeddah 21551, Saudi Arabia
关键词
Land use policy; Smart city; E-participation; Citizens' engagement; Neighborhood satisfaction; Public goods; 15-minute city; RESIDENTIAL SATISFACTION; PUBLIC-PARTICIPATION; CATEGORICAL-DATA; CITIES; SUSTAINABILITY; FRAMEWORK; LIFE;
D O I
10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106649
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In the otherwise rich debate on smart cities, the intersection of land use and spatial planning, on the one hand, their social and societal implications, on the other hand, and finally, the potential inherent in ICT-enhanced tools underlying the functioning, operation, management, and administration of smart city, remain overlooked. Considering that, due to multiple environmental and societal pressures, land use, has become more political than ever, whereby pleas for open and transparent methods of coordination, deliberation, and participation prolif-erate, it is imperative that citizens are involved in the land use policymaking at the level of the city and the neighborhoods. Even if substantial literature addressing each of these issues exists, approaches that would fit these multiple pieces of the puzzle together in one equation are still missing. By elaborating on the findings of an online survey (N = 5752) involving the citizens of a smart city (Lublin, Poland), this paper responds to this imperative. The findings suggest that utilizing insights from e-participation tools and surveys, in combination with more traditional instruments, such as meetings, debates, and workshops, may significantly improve land use policies in (smart) cities.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 84 条
[21]  
European Commission, 2020, Report on the quality oflife in European cities, 2020
[22]   Green(er) Cities and Their Citizens: Insights from the Participatory Budget of Lisbon [J].
Falanga, Roberto ;
Verheij, Jessica ;
Bina, Olivia .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (15)
[23]  
Filas-Przybyl S., 2020, STRATYFIKACJA DOCHOD
[24]   A Conceptual Framework for Ordered Logistic Regression Models [J].
Fullerton, Andrew S. .
SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS & RESEARCH, 2009, 38 (02) :306-347
[25]   Pattern classification with missing data: a review [J].
Garcia-Laencina, Pedro J. ;
Sancho-Gomez, Jose-Luis ;
Figueiras-Vidal, Anibal R. .
NEURAL COMPUTING & APPLICATIONS, 2010, 19 (02) :263-282
[26]  
Gawlowski R., 2019, STUD REG LOKAL, V4
[27]  
Gehl J., 2013, Cities for People
[28]   Smart as (un)democratic? The making of a smart city imaginary in Kolkata, India [J].
Ghosh, Bipashyee ;
Arora, Saurabh .
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING C-POLITICS AND SPACE, 2022, 40 (01) :318-339
[29]   Grappling with Smart City Politics in an Era of Market Triumphalism [J].
Gibbs, David ;
Krueger, Rob ;
MacLeod, Gordon .
URBAN STUDIES, 2013, 50 (11) :2151-2157
[30]   New urban challenges: Shared spaces in smart places - Overview and positioning [J].
Glaeser, Edward ;
Kourtit, Karima ;
Nijkamp, Peter .
LAND USE POLICY, 2021, 111