Engaging citizens in land use policy in the smart city context

被引:10
作者
Kedra, Arleta [1 ]
Maleszyk, Piotr [1 ]
Visvizi, Anna [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Maria Curie Sklodowska Univ Lublin, Pl Marii Curie Sklodowskiej 5, PL-20031 Lublin, Poland
[2] SGH Warsaw Sch Econ, Al Niepodleglosci 162, PL-02554 Warsaw, Poland
[3] Effat Univ, Effat Coll Business, Jeddah 21551, Saudi Arabia
关键词
Land use policy; Smart city; E-participation; Citizens' engagement; Neighborhood satisfaction; Public goods; 15-minute city; RESIDENTIAL SATISFACTION; PUBLIC-PARTICIPATION; CATEGORICAL-DATA; CITIES; SUSTAINABILITY; FRAMEWORK; LIFE;
D O I
10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106649
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In the otherwise rich debate on smart cities, the intersection of land use and spatial planning, on the one hand, their social and societal implications, on the other hand, and finally, the potential inherent in ICT-enhanced tools underlying the functioning, operation, management, and administration of smart city, remain overlooked. Considering that, due to multiple environmental and societal pressures, land use, has become more political than ever, whereby pleas for open and transparent methods of coordination, deliberation, and participation prolif-erate, it is imperative that citizens are involved in the land use policymaking at the level of the city and the neighborhoods. Even if substantial literature addressing each of these issues exists, approaches that would fit these multiple pieces of the puzzle together in one equation are still missing. By elaborating on the findings of an online survey (N = 5752) involving the citizens of a smart city (Lublin, Poland), this paper responds to this imperative. The findings suggest that utilizing insights from e-participation tools and surveys, in combination with more traditional instruments, such as meetings, debates, and workshops, may significantly improve land use policies in (smart) cities.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 84 条
[1]  
Ahmet Gun, 2020, [International Journal of Urban Sciences, 도시과학국제저널], V24, P189
[2]  
Allam Z, 2022, LANCET PLANET HEALTH, V6, pE181, DOI 10.1016/S2542-5196(22)00014-6
[3]   The Use of PPGIS: Towards Reaching a Meaningful Public Participation in Spatial Planning [J].
Bakowska-Waldmann, Edyta ;
Kaczmarek, Tomasz .
ISPRS INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEO-INFORMATION, 2021, 10 (09)
[4]   What makes a 'happy city'? [J].
Ballas, Dimitris .
CITIES, 2013, 32 :S39-S50
[5]   15-Minute City in Urban Regeneration Perspective: Two Methodological Approaches Compared to Support Decisions [J].
Balletto, Ginevra ;
Pezzagno, Michele ;
Richiedei, Anna .
COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE AND ITS APPLICATIONS, ICCSA 2021, PT V, 2021, 12953 :535-548
[6]   Eco-districts and data-driven smart eco-cities: Emerging approaches to strategic planning by design and spatial scaling and evaluation by technology [J].
Bibri, Simon Elias .
LAND USE POLICY, 2022, 113
[7]  
Botti A., 2023, EMERALD STUDIES POLI, P107, DOI [10.1108/978-1-80382-551-920231008, DOI 10.1108/978-1-80382-551-920231008]
[8]  
Brick J M, 1996, Stat Methods Med Res, V5, P215, DOI 10.1177/096228029600500302
[9]   Mapping place values: 10 lessons from two decades of public participation GIS empirical research [J].
Brown, Greg ;
Reed, Pat ;
Raymond, Christopher M. .
APPLIED GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 116
[10]   Smart cities: Between worlding and provincialising [J].
Burns, Ryan ;
Fast, Victoria ;
Levenda, Anthony ;
Miller, Byron .
URBAN STUDIES, 2021, 58 (03) :461-470