Pains and portends: A collaborative autoethnography of engineering faculty navigating gendered cultures

被引:0
作者
Miller, Callie A. A.
Castaneda, Daniel I. I. [1 ]
Aleman, Melissa Wood [2 ]
机构
[1] James Madison Univ, Dept Engn, Harrisonburg, VA USA
[2] James Madison Univ, Sch Commun Studies, Harrisonburg, VA 22807 USA
关键词
autoethnography; gender; engineering education; stem; reflexivity; dialogue; narrative; SCIENCE IDENTITY; ACADEMIC SCIENCE; WOMEN; EXPERIENCES; COLOR; COLLEGE; PERSISTENCE; CLIMATE; VALUES; WORK;
D O I
10.3389/fcomm.2023.1023594
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
This mediated collaborative autoethnography uses reproduced dialogue, poetic inquiry, and composite, fictionalized narratives to story the gendered experiences of two instructional faculty teaching a coordinated engineering class and working in an undergraduate engineering program at a large public university. The contrasting, gendered narratives of the engineering faculty storied in this paper illuminate several themes: (1) discourses of gendered relational labor (masculinized savior vs. feminized emotional work); (2) gendered experiences of invisibility (not being heard or recognized for expertise) and hypervisibility (as a woman in engineering); and (3) the discounting and attempted diminishment of gendered issues in organizational settings. While self-reflexive and dialogic practices embodied in this autoethnography reveal the transformative possibility of accomplices in disrupting gendered relations of power and activating social change from within, those practices alone are insufficient to trouble the masculine culture of engineering. Authentic change demands that these practices be joined with structural, organizational changes in order to reconcile disparate, gendered experiences in engineering cultures, lest the exodus of women from masculine-dominant engineering fields persist unabated.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 106 条
[1]  
Aberasturi-Apraiz E., 2020, Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, V21, DOI [10.17169/fqs-21.3.3397, DOI 10.17169/FQS-21.3.3397]
[2]  
Adams T.L., 2019, Gender, age and inequality in the professions, P244, DOI [10.4324/9781351052467, DOI 10.4324/9781351052467]
[3]  
Akpanudo U.M., 2017, 2017 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), P1
[4]  
Aleman C., 2020, PEDAGOGY VULNERABILI, P131
[5]   The complexity of our tears: Dis/enchantment and (In)difference in the academy [J].
Allen, BJ ;
Orbe, MP ;
Olivas, MR .
COMMUNICATION THEORY, 1999, 9 (04) :402-429
[6]  
Allen W., 2019, American Council on Education, P15
[7]  
Anicha C. L., 2020, ADVANCE Journal, V1, DOI [10.5399/osu/ADVJRNL.1.2.4, DOI 10.5399/OSU/ADVJRNL.1.2.4]
[8]  
Ashburn-Nardo L., 2018, The Oxford handbook of workplace discrimination, P373, DOI DOI 10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780199363643.013.27
[9]  
August L., 2006, ASS I RES
[10]   Racialized and Gendered Labor in Students' Responses to Precalculus and Calculus Instruction [J].
Battey, Dan ;
Amman, Kristen ;
Leyva, Luis A. ;
Hyland, Nora ;
McMichael, Emily Wolf .
JOURNAL FOR RESEARCH IN MATHEMATICS EDUCATION, 2022, 53 (02) :94-113