Coal transitions-part 2: phase-out dynamics in global long-term mitigation scenarios

被引:7
|
作者
Minx, Jan C. [1 ,2 ]
Hilaire, Jerome [1 ,3 ]
Mueller-Hansen, Finn [1 ,3 ]
Nemet, Gregory [4 ]
Diluiso, Francesca [1 ]
Andrew, Robbie M. [5 ]
Ayas, Ceren [6 ,7 ]
Bauer, Nico [3 ]
Bi, Stephen L. [3 ]
Clarke, Leon [8 ]
Creutzig, Felix [1 ,9 ]
Cui, Ryna Yiyun [8 ]
Jotzo, Frank [10 ]
Kalkuhl, Matthias [1 ,11 ]
Lamb, William F. [1 ,2 ]
Loeschel, Andreas [12 ]
Manych, Niccolo [1 ,13 ]
Meinshausen, Malte [14 ]
Oei, Pao-Yu [15 ]
Peters, Glen P. [5 ]
Sovacool, Benjamin [16 ,17 ,18 ,19 ]
Steckel, Jan C. [1 ,20 ]
Thomas, Sebastian [21 ]
Workman, Annabelle [6 ,22 ]
Wiseman, John [7 ]
机构
[1] Mercator Res Inst Global Commons & Climate Change, EUREF Campus 19, D-10829 Berlin, Germany
[2] Univ Leeds, Sch Earth & Environm, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
[3] Leibniz Assoc, Potsdam Inst Climate Impact Res PIK, POB 60 12 03, D-14412 Potsdam, Germany
[4] Univ Wisconsin, La Follette Sch Publ Affairs, 1225 Observ Dr, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[5] CICERO Ctr Int Climate Res, Postboks 1129 Blindern, N-0318 Oslo, Norway
[6] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne Climate Futures Acad, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[7] Univ Melbourne, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[8] Univ Maryland, Ctr Global Sustainabil, 7805 Regents Dr, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[9] Tech Univ Berlin, Sustainabil Econ Human Settlements, Str 17 Juni 135, D-10623 Berlin, Germany
[10] Australian Natl Univ, Crawford Sch Publ Policy, Canberra, CAT 2601, Australia
[11] Univ Potsdam, Fac Econ & Social Sci, August Bebel Str 89, D-14482 Potsdam, Germany
[12] Ruhr Univ Bochum, Fac Management & Econ, Univ Str 150, D-44801 Bochum, Germany
[13] Boston Univ, Global Dev Policy Ctr, 53 Bay State Rd, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[14] Univ Melbourne, Sch Geog Earth & Atmospher Sci, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[15] Europa Univ Flensburg, Dept Sustainable Energy Transit, FossilExit Res Grp, Munketoft 3b, D-24937 Flensburg, Germany
[16] Boston Univ, Dept Earth & Environm, Boston, MA USA
[17] Boston Univ, Inst Global Sustainabil, Boston, MA USA
[18] Aarhus Univ, Dept Business Dev & Technol, Aarhus, Denmark
[19] Univ Sussex, Bennett Inst Innovat & Policy Accelerat, Business Sch, Brighton, E Sussex, England
[20] Brandenburg Univ Technol Cottbus Senftenberg, Dept Climate & Dev Econ, Erich Weinert Str 1, D-03046 Cottbus, Germany
[21] Curtin Univ, Sustainable Engn Grp, Kent St, Bentley, WA 6102, Australia
[22] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne Sch Populat & Global Hlth, Parkville, Vic, Australia
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
coal phase-out; coal transition; integrated assessment models; technology learning; innovation; renewables; CLIMATE-CHANGE RESEARCH; DEGREES-C; CARBON BUDGET; AIR-POLLUTION; CO2; EMISSIONS; FOSSIL-FUELS; POLICY; FRAMEWORK; PATHWAYS; CAPTURE;
D O I
10.1088/1748-9326/ad24cd
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
A rapid phase-out of unabated coal use is essential to limit global warming to below 2 degrees C. This review presents a comprehensive assessment of coal transitions in mitigation scenarios consistent with the Paris Agreement, using data from more than 1500 publicly available scenarios generated by more than 30 integrated assessment models. Our ensemble analysis uses clustering techniques to categorize coal transition pathways in models and bridges evidence on technological learning and innovation with historical data of energy systems. Six key findings emerge: First, we identify three archetypal coal transitions within Paris-consistent mitigation pathways. About 38% of scenarios are 'coal phase out' trajectories and rapidly reduce coal consumption to near zero. 'Coal persistence' pathways (42%) reduce coal consumption much more gradually and incompletely. The remaining 20% follow 'coal resurgence' pathways, characterized by increased coal consumption in the second half of the century. Second, coal persistence and resurgence archetypes rely on the widespread availability and rapid scale-up of carbon capture and storage technology (CCS). Third, coal-transition archetypes spread across all levels of climate policy ambition and scenario cycles, reflecting their dependence on model structures and assumptions. Fourth, most baseline scenarios-including the shared socio-economic pathways (SSPs)-show much higher coal dependency compared to historical observations over the last 60 years. Fifth, coal-transition scenarios consistently incorporate very optimistic assumptions about the cost and scalability of CCS technologies, while being pessimistic about the cost and scalability of renewable energy technologies. Sixth, evaluation against coal-dependent baseline scenarios suggests that many mitigation scenarios overestimate the technical difficulty and costs of coal phase-outs. To improve future research, we recommend using up-to-date cost data and evidence about innovation and diffusion dynamics of different groups of zero or low-carbon technologies. Revised SSP quantifications need to incorporate projected technology learning and consistent cost structures, while reflecting recent trends in coal consumption.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 8 条
  • [1] Long-term impacts of a coal phase-out in Germany as part of a greenhouse gas mitigation strategy
    Heinrichs, Heidi Ursula
    Markewitz, Peter
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2017, 192 : 234 - 246
  • [2] Coal transitions-part 1: a systematic map and review of case study learnings from regional, national, and local coal phase-out experiences
    Diluiso, Francesca
    Walk, Paula
    Manych, Niccolo
    Cerutti, Nicola
    Chipiga, Vladislav
    Workman, Annabelle
    Ayas, Ceren
    Cui, Ryna Yiyun
    Cui, Diyang
    Song, Kaihui
    Banisch, Lucy A.
    Moretti, Nikolaj
    Callaghan, Max W.
    Clarke, Leon
    Creutzig, Felix
    Hilaire, Jerome
    Jotzo, Frank
    Kalkuhl, Matthias
    Lamb, William F.
    Loeschel, Andreas
    Mueller-Hansen, Finn
    Nemet, Gregory F.
    Oei, Pao-Yu
    Sovacool, Benjamin K.
    Steckel, Jan C.
    Thomas, Sebastian
    Wiseman, John
    Minx, Jan C.
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2021, 16 (11)
  • [3] Assessing the Feasibility of Global Long-Term Mitigation Scenarios
    Gambhir, Ajay
    Drouet, Laurent
    McCollum, David
    Napp, Tamaryn
    Bernie, Dan
    Hawkes, Adam
    Fricko, Oliver
    Havlik, Petr
    Riahi, Keywan
    Bosetti, Valentina
    Lowe, Jason
    ENERGIES, 2017, 10 (01)
  • [4] Coal Phase-Out and Carbon Tax Analysis with Long-Term Planning Models: A Case Study for the Chilean Electric Power System
    Castillo, Patricio
    Aguad, Matias
    Lorca, Alvaro
    Cordova, Samuel
    Negrete-Pincetic, Matias
    ENERGIES, 2024, 17 (21)
  • [5] The short-term comprehensive impact of the phase-out of global coal combustion on air pollution and climate change
    Ge, Wendong
    Prime, Noah S.
    Smith, Steven J.
    Liu, Junfeng
    Ren, Yang
    Zhou, Yuhan
    Wu, Huihuang
    Wang, Xian
    Chen, Gang
    ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2025, 367
  • [6] Impacts of coal use phase-out in China on the atmospheric environment: (2) public health and global radiative forcing
    Zhou, Yuhan
    Li, Jie
    Ge, Wendong
    Liu, Junfeng
    Wu, Huihuang
    Zheng, Leyi
    Wang, Xian
    Qin, Yue
    Zhou, Jingcheng
    Wang, Yuqing
    Ren, Yang
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 319
  • [7] Competing uses of biomass for energy and chemicals: implications for long-term global CO2 mitigation potential
    Daioglou, Vassilis
    Wicke, Birka
    Faaij, Andre P. C.
    Van Vuuren, Detlef P.
    GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY, 2015, 7 (06): : 1321 - 1334
  • [8] Developing long-term strategies to reduce energy use and CO2 emissions-analysis of three mitigation scenarios for iron and steel production in China
    Karali, Nihan
    Xu, Tengfang
    Sathaye, Jayant
    MITIGATION AND ADAPTATION STRATEGIES FOR GLOBAL CHANGE, 2016, 21 (05) : 699 - 719