Treatment Planning of Bulky Tumors Using Pencil Beam Scanning Proton GRID Therapy

被引:3
|
作者
Halthore, Aditya [1 ,2 ]
Fellows, Zachary [2 ]
Tran, Anh [2 ]
Deville, Curtiland, Jr. [1 ,2 ]
Wright, Jean L. [1 ,2 ]
Meyer, Jeffrey [1 ]
Li, Heng [1 ,2 ]
Sheikh, Khadija [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol & Mol Sci, Sch Med, Baltimore, MD USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Proton Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Washington, DC USA
关键词
proton; spatial fractionation; GRID; bulky tumors; RADIATION-THERAPY;
D O I
10.14338/IJPT-22-00028
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To compare spatially fractionated radiation therapy (GRID) treatment planning techniques using proton pencil-beam-scanning (PBS) and photon therapy. Materials and Methods: PBS and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) GRID plans were retrospectively generated for 5 patients with bulky tumors. GRID targets were arranged along the long axis of the gross tumor, spaced 2 and 3 cm apart, and treated with a prescription of 18 Gy. PBS plans used 2- to 3-beam multiple-field optimization with robustness evaluation. Dosimetric parameters including peak-to-edge ratio (PEDR), ratio of dose to 90% of the valley to dose to 10% of the peak VPDR(D90/D10), and volume of normal tissue receiving at least 5 Gy (V5) and 10 Gy (V10) were calculated. The peak-to-valley dose ratio (PVDR), VPDR(D90/D10), and organ-at-risk doses were prospectively assessed in 2 patients undergoing PBS-GRID with pretreatment quality assurance computed tomography (QACT) scans. Results: PBS and VMAT GRID plans were generated for 5 patients with bulky tumors. Gross tumor volume values ranged from 826 to 1468 cm3. Peak-to-edge ratio for PBS was higher than for VMAT for both spacing scenarios (2-cm spacing, P =.02; 3-cm spacing, P =.01). VPDR(D90/D10) for PBS was higher than for VMAT (2-cm spacing, P =.004; 3-cm spacing, P =.002). Normal tissue V5 was lower for PBS than for VMAT (2cm spacing, P =.03; 3-cm spacing, P =.02). Normal tissue mean dose was lower with PBS than with VMAT (2-cm spacing, P =.03; 3-cm spacing, P =.02). Two patients treated using PBS GRID and assessed with pretreatment QACT scans demonstrated robust PVDR, VPDR(D90/D10), and organs-at-risk doses. Conclusions: The PEDR was significantly higher for PBS than VMAT plans, indicating lower target edge dose. Normal tissue mean dose was significantly lower with PBS than VMAT. PBS GRID may result in lower normal tissue dose compared with VMAT plans, allowing for further dose escalation in patients with bulky disease.
引用
收藏
页码:40 / 49
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Pencil beam scanning versus passively scattered proton therapy for unresectable pancreatic cancer
    Chuong, Michael
    Badiyan, Shahed N.
    Yam, Man
    Li, Zuofeng
    Langen, Katja
    Regine, William
    Morris, Christopher
    Snider, James, III
    Mehta, Minesh
    Huh, Soon
    Rutenberg, Michael
    Nichols, Romaine C.
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 9 (04) : 687 - 693
  • [22] Initial Report of Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy for Posthysterectomy Patients With Gynecologic Cancer
    Lin, Lilie L.
    Kirk, Maura
    Scholey, Jessica
    Taku, Nicolette
    Kiely, Janid B.
    White, Benjamin
    Both, Stefan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2016, 95 (01): : 181 - 189
  • [23] Clinical Outcome of Sacral Chordoma Patients Treated with Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy
    Walser, M.
    Bojaxhiu, B.
    Kawashiro, S.
    Tran, S.
    Beer, J.
    Leiser, D.
    Pica, A.
    Bachtiary, B.
    Weber, D. C.
    CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 33 (12) : E578 - E585
  • [24] Online Adaptive Proton Therapy Facilitated by Artificial Intelligence-Based Autosegmentation in Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy
    Feng, Hongying
    Shan, Jie
    Vargas, Carlos E.
    Keole, Sameer R.
    Rwigema, Jean-Claude M.
    Yu, Nathan Y.
    Ding, Yuzhen
    Zhang, Lian
    Hu, Yanle
    Schild, Steven E.
    Wong, William W.
    Vora, Sujay A.
    Shen, Jiajian
    Liu, Wei
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2025, 121 (03): : 822 - 831
  • [25] Hearing Loss in Cancer Patients with Skull Base Tumors Undergoing Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Bachtiary, Barbara
    Veraguth, Dorothe
    Roos, Nicolaas
    Pfiffner, Flurin
    Leiser, Dominic
    Pica, Alessia
    Walser, Marc
    von Felten, Stefanie
    Weber, Damien C.
    CANCERS, 2022, 14 (16)
  • [26] Impact of dose engine algorithm in pencil beam scanning proton therapy for breast cancer
    Tommasino, Francesco
    Fellin, Francesco
    Lorentini, Stefano
    Farace, Paolo
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 50 : 7 - 12
  • [27] Early outcome after craniospinal irradiation with pencil beam scanning proton therapy for children, adolescents and young adults with brain tumors
    Vazquez, Miriam
    Bachmann, Nicolas
    Pica, Alessia
    Bolsi, Alessandra
    De Angelis, Claudio
    Lomax, Antony J.
    Weber, Damien C.
    PEDIATRIC BLOOD & CANCER, 2023, 70 (02)
  • [28] Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy for Adolescents and Young Adults with Head and Neck Sarcomas
    Vazquez, Miriam
    Baust, Katja
    Ilundain, Amaia
    Leiser, Dominic
    Bachtiary, Barbara
    Pica, Alessia
    Kliebsch, Ulrike L.
    Calaminus, Gabriele
    Weber, Damien C.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PARTICLE THERAPY, 2023, 10 (02) : 73 - 84
  • [29] Gantry-based pencil beam scanning proton therapy for uveal melanoma: IMPT versus proton arc therapy
    Qi, Hang
    Hu, Lei
    Huang, Sheng
    Lee, Yen-Po
    Yu, Francis
    Chen, Qing
    Yang, Yunjie
    Kang, Minglei
    Zhai, Huifang
    Vermeulen, Milo
    Shim, Andy
    Park, Peter
    Ding, Xuanfeng
    Zhou, Jun
    Abramson, David H.
    Francis, Jasmine H.
    Simone, Charles B.
    Barker, Christopher A.
    Lin, Haibo
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2025, 20 (01)
  • [30] Pencil beam scanning proton beam therapy for huge (>10cm) hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Cheng, Jen-Yu
    Wang, Yu-Ming
    Huang, Eng-Yen Huang
    Ho, Meng-Wei
    Li, Fang-Jing
    Huang, Bing-Shen
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2024, 194 : S2240 - S2242