Consideration of overadjustment bias in guidelines and tools for systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies is long overdue

被引：0
作者：
van Zwieten, Anita [1 ,2 ]
Blyth, Fiona M. [1 ,3 ]
Wong, Germaine [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Khalatbari-Soltani, Saman [1 ,3 ,5 ]
机构：
[1] Univ Sydney, Sch Publ Hlth, Fac Med & Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Childrens Hosp Westmead, Ctr Kidney Res, Westmead, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Sydney, ARC Ctr Excellence Populat Ageing Res CEPAR, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Westmead Hosp, Ctr Transplant & Renal Res, Westmead, NSW, Australia
[5] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Sch Publ Hlth, Edward Ford Bldg A27, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
来源：
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY | 2024年 / 53卷 / 01期
基金：
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词：
Systematic review; meta-analysis; overadjustment bias; confounding; guidelines; risk of bias; critical appraisal; observational studies; meta-research; bias; QUALITY; IMPACT;
D O I：
10.1093/ije/dyad174
中图分类号：
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号：
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要：
[No abstract available]
引用
收藏
页数：5
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2006, Methods in Social Epidemiol
  • [2] Scoping review on interventions to improve adherence to reporting guidelines in health research
    Blanco, David
    Altman, Doug
    Moher, David
    Boutron, Isabelle
    Kirkham, Jamie J.
    Cobo, Erik
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (05):
  • [3] Empirical evaluation of the methods used in systematic reviews including observational studies and randomized trials
    Cheurfa, Cherifa
    Tsokani, Sofia
    Kontouli, Katerina-Maria
    Boutron, Isabelle
    Chaimani, Anna
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2023, 158 : 44 - 52
  • [4] Reporting Standards for Research in Psychology Why Do We Need Them? What Might They Be?
    Cooper, Harris
    Maxwell, Scott
    Stone, Arthur
    Sher, Kenneth J.
    [J]. AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2008, 63 (09) : 839 - 851
  • [5] The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions
    Downs, SH
    Black, N
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 1998, 52 (06) : 377 - 384
  • [6] Risk of bias tools in systematic reviews of health interventions: an analysis of PROSPERO-registered protocols
    Farrah, Kelly
    Young, Kelsey
    Tunis, Matthew C.
    Zhao, Linlu
    [J]. SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2019, 8 (01)
  • [7] Quantifying biases in causal models:: Classical confounding vs collider-stratification bias
    Greenland, S
    [J]. EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2003, 14 (03) : 300 - 306
  • [8] Hayden JA., 2013, ANN INTERN MED, V158, P86
  • [9] Inclusion of nonrandomized studies in Cochrane systematic reviews was found to be in need of improvement
    Ijaz, Sharea
    Verbeek, Jos H.
    Mischke, Christina
    Ruotsalainen, Jani
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2014, 67 (06) : 645 - 653
  • [10] Good practices for quantitative bias analysis
    Lash, Timothy L.
    Fox, Matthew P.
    MacLehose, Richard F.
    Maldonado, George
    McCandless, Lawrence C.
    Greenland, Sander
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2014, 43 (06) : 1969 - 1985
1234