Zero Tolerance for Coercion? Historical, Cultural and Organisational Contexts for Effective Implementation of Coercion-Free Mental Health Services around the World

被引:9
作者
Whittington, Richard [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Aluh, Deborah Oyine [4 ,5 ]
Caldas-de-Almeida, Jose-Miguel [4 ]
机构
[1] St Olavs Hosp, Ctr Res & Educ Secur, Prisons & Forens Psychiat Forens Dept Ostmarka, N-7030 Trondheim, Norway
[2] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol NTNU, Dept Mental Hlth, N-7034 Trondheim, Norway
[3] Univ Liverpool, Dept Publ Hlth Policy & Syst, Liverpool L69 3BX, Merseyside, England
[4] Nova Med Sch, Comprehens Hlth Res Ctr, Lisbon Inst Global Mental Hlth, P-1169056 Lisbon, Portugal
[5] Univ Nigeria Nsukka, Dept Clin Pharm & Pharm Management, Nsukka 410105, Nigeria
关键词
coercion; restraint; mental health services; implementation science; INVOLUNTARY HOSPITALIZATION; PSYCHIATRIC-HOSPITALIZATION; MECHANICAL RESTRAINT; PATIENT AGGRESSION; SECLUSION RATES; STAFF ATTITUDES; ARTICLE; 12; IMPACT; WARDS; SAFEWARDS;
D O I
10.3390/healthcare11212834
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Coercion of service users/patients when receiving care and treatment has been a serious dilemma for mental health services since at least the 18th century, and the debate about how best to minimise or even eradicate compulsion remains intense. Coercion is now, once again and rightly, at the top of the international policy agenda and the COST Action 'FOSTREN' is one example of a renewed commitment by service user advocates, practitioners and researchers to move forward in seriously addressing this problem. The focus of service improvement efforts has moved from pure innovation to practical implementation of effective interventions based on an understanding of the historical, cultural and political realities in which mental health services operate. These realities and their impact on the potential for change vary between countries across Europe and beyond. This article provides a novel overview by focusing on the historical, cultural and political contexts which relate to successful implementation primarily in Europe, North America and Australasia so that policy and practice in these and other regions can be adopted with an awareness of these potentially relevant factors. It also outlines some key aspects of current knowledge about the leading coercion-reduction interventions which might be considered when redesigning mental health services.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 121 条
  • [51] Effect of joint crisis plans on use of compulsory treatment in psychiatry: single blind randomised controlled trial
    Henderson, C
    Flood, C
    Leese, M
    Thornicroft, G
    Sutherby, K
    Szmukler, G
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 329 (7458): : 136 - 138A
  • [52] Hermann RC:., 2005, IMPROVING MENTAL HEA
  • [53] Clinical and socio-demographic characteristics associated with involuntary admissions in Switzerland between 2008 and 2016: An observational cohort study before and after implementation of the new legislation
    Hotzy, Florian
    Hengartner, Michael P.
    Hoff, Paul
    Jaeger, Matthias
    Theodoridou, Anastasia
    [J]. EUROPEAN PSYCHIATRY, 2019, 59 : 70 - 76
  • [54] Huckshorn K. A., 2006, 6 CORE STRATEGIES RE
  • [55] Staff attitudes and thoughts about the use of coercion in acute psychiatric wards
    Husum, Tonje Lossius
    Bjorngaard, Johan Haakon
    Finset, Arnstein
    Ruud, Torleif
    [J]. SOCIAL PSYCHIATRY AND PSYCHIATRIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2011, 46 (09) : 893 - 901
  • [56] A cross-sectional prospective study of seclusion, restraint and involuntary medication in acute psychiatric wards: patient, staff and ward characteristics
    Husum, Tonje Lossius
    Bjorngaard, Johan Hokon
    Finset, Arnstein
    Ruud, Torleif
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2010, 10
  • [57] Mental health nurses' emotions, exposure to patient aggression, attitudes to and use of coercive measures: Cross sectional questionnaire survey
    Jalil, Rahul
    Huber, Jorg W.
    Sixsmith, Judith
    Dickens, Geoffrey L.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2017, 75 : 130 - 138
  • [58] Differences in Seclusion Rates Between Admission Wards: Does Patient Compilation Explain?
    Janssen, W. A.
    Noorthoorn, E. O.
    Nijman, H. L. I.
    Bowers, L.
    Hoogendoorn, A. W.
    Smit, A.
    Widdershoven, G. A. M.
    [J]. PSYCHIATRIC QUARTERLY, 2013, 84 (01) : 39 - 52
  • [59] The influence of staffing levels on the use of seclusion
    Janssen, Wim
    Noorthoorn, Eric
    van Linge, Roland
    Lendemeijer, Bert
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LAW AND PSYCHIATRY, 2007, 30 (02) : 118 - 126
  • [60] Public attitudes towards involuntary admission and treatment by mental health services in Norway
    Joa, Inge
    Hustoft, Kjetil
    Anda, Liss Goril
    Bronnick, Kolbjorn
    Nielssen, Olav
    Johannessen, Jan Olav
    Langeveld, Johannes H.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LAW AND PSYCHIATRY, 2017, 55 : 1 - 7