Reduction of Satellite Signature Effect in High-Accuracy Satellite Laser Ranging to Etalon

被引:0
|
作者
An, Ning [1 ]
Guan, Bowen [1 ]
Nunez, Natalia Edith [2 ]
Gao, Jian [1 ]
Dong, Xue [1 ]
Zhang, Haitao [1 ]
Podesta, Ricardo Cesar [3 ]
Liu, Zhengjun
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Changchun Observ, Natl Astron Observ, Changchun 130117, Peoples R China
[2] Natl Univ San Juan, Dept Astron Sci, RA-5400 San Juan, Argentina
[3] Felix Aguilar Astron Observ OAFA, RA-5400 San Juan, Argentina
来源
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL | 2023年 / 13卷 / 19期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
satellite laser ranging; satellite signature effect; pro-processing algorithm; center of mass corrections; Etalon;
D O I
10.3390/app131911106
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Etalon is considered to be one of the most promising satellites for studying crustal motions, Earth rotation, and other scientific applications. Unfortunately, its outsized shape and signature result in a measurement range bias of several millimeters. On the basis of simulations of the echo signals, we analyze the center of mass corrections (CoM) for Etalon due to variations in satellite signature effect at different incidence angles. To minimize range bias caused by satellite signature effects, a center of mass corrections filter has been proposed for the processing of standard SLR data. According to the relationship between RMS of CoM and the upper limits of the rejection criteria, the measurements with the lowest variability of CoM are selected for normal points. Statistics indicate that the center of mass corrections filter can improve the stability of the collected data by 79%, and reduce the mean RMS of normal points from 163.7 x 41.8 ps to 118.2 x 8.94 ps. Additionally, the new algorithm is applicable to Etalon-2. In particular, this paper enriches and provides a useful reference for minimizing the effects of satellite signatures on the production of SLR data by providing a theoretical model that incorporates systematic errors in SLR.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Simulation of high accuracy inter-satellite ranging measurements
    Kim, J
    Key, KW
    Tapley, BA
    SPACEFLIGHT MECHANICS 2001, VOL 108, PTS 1 AND 2, 2001, 108 : 641 - 654
  • [22] 1.06 μm wavelength based high accuracy satellite laser ranging and space debris detection
    Meng Wen-Dong
    Zhang Hai-Feng
    Deng Hua-Rong
    Tang Kai
    Wu Zhi-Bo
    Wang Yu-Rong
    Wu Guang
    Zhang Zhong-Ping
    Chen Xin-Yang
    ACTA PHYSICA SINICA, 2020, 69 (01)
  • [23] High-Accuracy Laser Altimetry Global Elevation Control Point Dataset for Satellite Topographic Mapping
    Li, Binbin
    Xie, Huan
    Tong, Xiaohua
    Tang, Hong
    Liu, Shijie
    Jin, Yanmin
    Wang, Chao
    Ye, Zhen
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 60
  • [24] Optical metrology terminal for satellite-to-satellite laser ranging
    Mandel, Oliver
    Chwalla, Michael
    Schuldtb, Thilo
    Krauser, Jasper
    Weise, Dennis
    Braxmaier, Claus
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SPACE OPTICS-ICSO 2018, 2018, 11180
  • [25] ANALYSIS OF SATELLITE LASER RANGING DATA TO INVESTIGATE SATELLITE AERODYNAMICS
    HARRISON, IK
    SWINERD, GG
    PLANETARY AND SPACE SCIENCE, 1995, 43 (08) : 1023 - &
  • [26] Demonstration on the design of filter indexes of inter-satellite high accuracy ranging system for gravity satellite
    Kang Kai-Xuan
    Li Hui
    Wu Yun-Long
    Zou Zheng-Bo
    Xing Le-Lin
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICS-CHINESE EDITION, 2012, 55 (10): : 3240 - 3247
  • [27] RANGING PERFORMANCE OF SATELLITE LASER ALTIMETERS
    GARDNER, CS
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 1992, 30 (05): : 1061 - 1072
  • [28] COMPACT SATELLITE RANGING LASER SUBSYSTEM
    HAMAL, K
    JELINKOVA, H
    IEEE JOURNAL OF QUANTUM ELECTRONICS, 1978, 14 (10) : 701 - 701
  • [29] The limiting possibilities of the satellite laser ranging
    Prokhorenko, VI
    17TH CONGRESS OF THE INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION FOR OPTICS: OPTICS FOR SCIENCE AND NEW TECHNOLOGY, PTS 1 AND 2, 1996, 2778 : 992 - 993
  • [30] Satellite laser ranging to GPS and GLONASS
    Krzysztof Sośnica
    Daniela Thaller
    Rolf Dach
    Peter Steigenberger
    Gerhard Beutler
    Daniel Arnold
    Adrian Jäggi
    Journal of Geodesy, 2015, 89 : 725 - 743