Public perceived risks and benefits of carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS): Scale development and validation

被引:20
作者
Xu, Yinghua [1 ]
Liu, Bingsheng [1 ]
Chen, Yuan [1 ]
Lu, Shijian [2 ]
机构
[1] Tianjin Univ, Coll Management & Econ, Tianjin 300072, Peoples R China
[2] China Univ Min & Technol, Low Carbon Energy Inst, Xuzhou 221008, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
CCUS; Perceived risks; Perceived benefits; Public acceptance; CCS TECHNOLOGIES; DIOXIDE CAPTURE; ACCEPTANCE; PERCEPTION; COMMUNICATION; TRUST; INFORMATION; MODEL; PREDICTORS; MITIGATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119109
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
As a critical technology to mitigate climate change, the large-scale implementation of carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) depends on both technological advancement and public acceptance, which is significantly influenced by the perceived risks and benefits. Existing studies, however, have yet to reach a consensus regarding the measurement of CCUS in these two aspects. To fill this gap, this paper develops and validates new scales based on four studies. Specifically, Study 1 generates the initial item pool based on a literature review and semistructured interviews, and then invites experts to examine the content validity of these items; Study 2 identifies the dimensions and assesses the reliability and validity of the measures through an exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis; Study 3 conducts a one-way ANOVA to test known-group validity; and Study 4 employed structural equation modeling to evaluate the nomological validity. The results demonstrate the internal consistency, reliability, and construct validity of the new scales developed to measure CCUS. This study provides a valuable tool for investigating public perceptions of CCUS and can help policymakers develop future publicity strategies.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 75 条
[21]  
Holloway I, 2010, Qualitative Research in Nursing and Healthcare, V3rd
[22]   Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria Versus New Alternatives [J].
Hu, Li-tze ;
Bentler, Peter M. .
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 1999, 6 (01) :1-55
[23]   Hydrogen fuel station acceptance: A structural equation model based on the technology acceptance framework [J].
Huijts, N. M. A. ;
Molin, E. J. E. ;
van Wee, B. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 38 :153-166
[24]   Environmental Risk (and Benefit) Information Seeking Intentions: The Case of Carbon Capture and Storage in Southeast Texas [J].
Kahlor, Lee Ann ;
Yang, Janet ;
Li, Xiaoshan ;
Wang, Wan ;
Olson, Hilary Clement ;
Atkinson, Lucy .
ENVIRONMENTAL COMMUNICATION-A JOURNAL OF NATURE AND CULTURE, 2020, 14 (04) :555-572
[25]   Comparative socio-cultural analysis of risk perception of Carbon Capture and Storage in the European Union [J].
Karimi, Farid ;
Toikka, Arho ;
Hukkinen, Janne I. .
ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2016, 21 :114-122
[26]  
Karytsas Spyridon, 2023, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, DOI 10.1088/1755-1315/1196/1/012092
[27]   Evaluating the perceived social impacts of hosting large-scale sport tourism events: Scale development and validation [J].
Kim, Wonyoung ;
Jun, Ho Mun ;
Walker, Matthew ;
Drane, Dan .
TOURISM MANAGEMENT, 2015, 48 :21-32
[28]  
Kline R. B., 2010, PRINCIPLES PRACTICE, V3rd, DOI 10.1038/156278a0
[29]  
Krueger R. A., 2002, DESIGNING CONDUCTING
[30]   Communication of CCS monitoring activities may not have a reassuring effect on the public [J].
L'Orange Seigo, Selma ;
Wallquist, Lasse ;
Dohle, Simone ;
Siegrist, Michael .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2011, 5 (06) :1674-1679