Effect of surgical timing on outcomes after cholecystectomy for mild gallstone pancreatitis

被引:5
|
作者
Cho, Nam Yong [1 ]
Chervu, Nikhil L. [1 ]
Sakowitz, Sara [1 ]
Verma, Arjun [1 ]
Kronen, Elsa [1 ]
Orellana, Manuel [1 ]
de Virgilio, Christian [2 ]
Benharash, Peyman [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] UCLA, David Geffen Sch Med, Div Cardiac Surg, Cardiovasc Outcomes Res Labs, Los Angeles, CA USA
[2] UCLA, Harbor Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] UCLA, Ctr Hlth Sci, 10833 Conte Ave, Room 62-249, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
关键词
ACUTE-CARE SURGERY; LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY; BILIARY PANCREATITIS; HOSPITAL VOLUME; IMPACT; SELECTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.surg.2023.05.009
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Retrospective and single-center studies have demonstrated that early cholecystectomy is associated with shorter length of stay in patients with mild gallstone pancreatitis. However, these studies are not powered to detect differences in adverse events. Using a nationally representative cohort, we evaluated the association of timing for cholecystectomy with clinical outcomes and resource use in patients with gallstone pancreatitis.Methods: All adult hospitalizations for gallstone pancreatitis were tabulated from the 2016-2019 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Using International Classification of Disease, 10th Revision codes, patient comorbidities and operative characteristics were determined. Patients with end-organ dysfunction or cholangitis were excluded to isolate those with only mild gallstone pancreatitis. Major adverse events were defined as a composite of 30-day mortality and perioperative (cardiovascular, respiratory, neurologic, infectious, and thromboembolic) complications. Timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy was divided into Early (within 2 days of admission) and Late (>2 days after admission) cohorts. Multivariable logistic and linear regression were then used to evaluate the association of cholecystectomy timing with major adverse events and secondary outcomes of interest, including postoperative hospital duration of stay, costs, non -home discharge, and readmission rate within 30 days of discharge.Results: Of an estimated 129,451 admissions for acute gallstone pancreatitis, 25.6% comprised the Early cohort. Compared to patients in the Early cohort, Late cohort patients were older (56 [40-69] vs 53 [37 -66] years, P < .001), more likely male (36.6 vs 32.8%, P < .001), and more frequently underwent preop-erative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (22.2 vs 10.9%, P < .001). In addition, the Late cohort had higher unadjusted rates of major adverse events and index hospitalization costs, compared to Early. After risk adjustment, late cholecystectomy was associated with higher odds of major adverse events (adjusted odds ratio 1.40, 95% confidence interval 1.29-1.51) and overall adjusted hospitalization costs by $2,700 (95% confidence interval 2,400-2,800). In addition, compared to the Early group, those in the Late cohort had increased odds of 30-day readmission (adjusted odds ratio 1.12, 95% confidence interval 1.03 -1.23) and non-home discharge (adjusted odds ratio 1.42, 95% confidence interval 1.31-1.55).Conclusion: Cholecystectomy >2 days after admission for mild gallstone pancreatitis was independently associated with increased major adverse events, costs, 30-day readmissions, and non-home discharge. Given the significant clinical and financial consequences, reduced timing to surgery should be prioritized in the overall management of this patient population.
引用
收藏
页码:660 / 665
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Urgent ERCP and early-elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy in gallstone pancreatitis
    Sungler, P
    Holzinger, J
    Waclawiczek, HW
    Heinerman, PM
    Boeckl, O
    ZENTRALBLATT FUR CHIRURGIE, 1997, 122 (12): : 1099 - 1102
  • [42] Early Versus Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis with Mild Pancreatitis
    Wang, Lu
    Yu, Hai-feng
    Guo, Tong
    Xie, Peng
    Zhang, Zhi-wei
    Yu, Ya-hong
    CURRENT MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2020, 40 (05) : 937 - 942
  • [43] National analysis of outcomes in timing of cholecystectomy for acute cholangitis
    Ng, Ayesha P.
    Seo, Young-Ji
    Ali, Konmal
    Coaston, Troy
    Mallick, Saad
    de Virgilio, Christian
    Benharash, Peyman
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2025, 239
  • [44] Early cholecystectomy for non-severe acute gallstone pancreatitis: easier said than done
    Guadagni, Simone
    Cengeli, Ismail
    Palmeri, Matte
    Bastiani, Luca
    Bertolucci, Andrea
    Modesti, Matteo
    Galatioto, Christian
    Chiarugi, Massimo
    MINERVA CHIRURGICA, 2017, 72 (02) : 91 - 97
  • [45] Early Versus Late Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Patients with Acute Gallstone Pancreatitis
    Ashish Sharma
    Apoorva Madapu
    Jigisha Rakholiya
    Shivy Sharma
    Anil Jha
    SN Comprehensive Clinical Medicine, 2021, 3 (2) : 590 - 599
  • [46] Outcome of early cholecystectomy in acute mild biliary pancreatitis
    Jan, Yousaf
    Shah, Muhammad
    Hussain, Shaukat
    Waqas
    Din, Ahmad
    RAWAL MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2014, 39 (03): : 281 - 284
  • [47] Determining the optimal time interval for cholecystectomy in moderate to severe gallstone pancreatitis: A systematic review of published evidence
    Hughes, Daniel Llwyd
    Morris-Stiff, Gareth
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 84 : 171 - 179
  • [48] Long-term effectiveness of cholecystectomy and endoscopic sphincterotomy in the management of gallstone pancreatitis
    Mustafa, Abdalla
    Begaj, Irena
    Deakin, Mark
    Durkin, Damien
    Corless, David J.
    Wilson, Richard
    Slavin, John P.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2014, 28 (01): : 127 - 133
  • [49] Can the timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy after biliary pancreatitis change the conversion rate to open surgery?
    Aksoy, Fikret
    Demiral, Gokhan
    Ekinci, Ozgur
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 41 (04) : 307 - 312
  • [50] Timing of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Mild and Moderate Acute Cholecystitis
    Yoh, Tomoaki
    Okamura, Ryuji
    Nobuto, Yoshinari
    Wada, Seidai
    Nakamura, Yuya
    Kato, Tatsushi
    Nakayama, Hiroyuki
    HEPATO-GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 61 (134) : 1489 - 1493