>Intersectional knowledge as rural social innovation

被引:16
作者
Banerjee, Swati [1 ]
dos Santos, Luciane Lucas [2 ]
Hulgard, Lars [3 ]
机构
[1] Tata Inst Social Sci, Mumbai, India
[2] Univ Coimbra, Ctr Social Studies, Coimbra, Portugal
[3] Roskilde Univ, Roskilde, Denmark
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Rural social innovation; People -centered social innovation; Intersectionality; Feminist epistemology; PARADIGM; GENDER; FOCUS; RACE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.04.007
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
The interrelationship between rural, rurality and social innovation still remains underexplored even though there has been considerable work within the individual discourses of social innovation and rural studies. This paper aims at broadening the scope of this interrelationship by exploring the nuanced dynamics and complexities of rural lifeworld and the experiences and knowledges of actors that shape the understanding of rural social innovation. At the core of this analysis lies two key ideas including a) an understanding that rural groups' and communities' complexities and marginalities might not be adequately understood without addressing the complex ways in which identities of caste, race, gender, ethnicity and class intersect and b) that the locally -rooted solutions resulting from these concerns are usually underrepresented in the social innovation literature and the relevance of the same needs to be recognized. This reimagining of rural social innovation is located within the theoretical perspectives of intersectionality and feminist perspective and the epistemologies of the South focusing on 'ecologies of knowledges' that are capable of complexifying and adding to the contemporary debates on social innovation. From an understanding of the above, the authors argue that strategies and in-novations grounded on the specific groups' and communities' own knowledge and rhythm within complex rural contexts needs be recognized as social innovation.
引用
收藏
页码:252 / 261
页数:10
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]   What is social innovation? The paradigm shift and its relationship with Social Work [J].
Alonso Puelles, Andoni ;
Echeverria Ezponda, Javier .
CUADERNOS DE TRABAJO SOCIAL, 2016, 29 (02) :163-171
[2]  
Anderson L., 2020, PEOPLE CTR SOCIAL IN
[3]  
Ashraf A., 2022, Outlook
[4]   GENDERING RECIPROCITY: Solving a Puzzle of Nonreciprocation [J].
Ashwin, Sarah ;
Tartakovskaya, Irina ;
Ilyina, Marina ;
Lytkina, Tatyana .
GENDER & SOCIETY, 2013, 27 (03) :396-421
[5]   How Social Innovation 'Came to Be': Tracing the Evolution of a Contested Concept [J].
Ayob, Noorseha ;
Teasdale, Simon ;
Fagan, Kylie .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL POLICY, 2016, 45 (04) :635-653
[6]  
Banerjee S, 2020, ROUT STUD SOC ENTERP, P1
[7]   Social innovation and sustainability; how to disentangle the buzzword and its application in the field of agriculture and rural development [J].
Bock, Bettina B. .
STUDIES IN AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2012, 114 (02) :57-63
[8]  
Borras Jr S.M., 2010, CRIT PERSPECT, P1
[9]  
Brah A., 2004, J INT WOMENS STUDIES, V5, P75, DOI DOI 10.1057/9781137425997_5
[10]   The complexities and potential of theorizing gender, caste, race, and class [J].
Brewer, RM ;
Conrad, CA ;
King, MC .
FEMINIST ECONOMICS, 2002, 8 (02) :3-17