A review of hydrogen-air cloud explosions: The fundamentals, overpressure prediction methods, and influencing factors

被引:65
作者
Hu, Qingchun [1 ]
Zhang, Xihong [1 ]
Hao, Hong [1 ]
机构
[1] Curtin Univ, Ctr Infrastruct Monitoring & Protect, Sch Civil & Mech Engn, Perth, Australia
关键词
Hydrogen-air cloud; Blast loading; Overpressure prediction methods; Influencing factors; TO-DETONATION TRANSITION; MINIMUM IGNITION ENERGY; FLAME ACCELERATION; TANK RUPTURE; BLAST WAVE; INITIAL PRESSURE; LIQUID-HYDROGEN; NUMERICAL-SIMULATION; SELF-IGNITION; INHOMOGENEOUS MIXTURES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.11.302
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Hydrogen is one of the most promising renewable energies that has been observing rapid development over the past years. Recent accidental explosion incidents and the associated damages have demonstrated the importance of hydrogen safety against potential explo-sions. This article presents a systematic review on hydrogen explosions. Potential explo-sion scenarios including the existence of impurities and rich-oxygen environment in the production, storage with extreme-high pressure and ultra-low temperature, trans-portation, and consumption processes are reviewed. Different types of hydrogen-air cloud explosion include expansion and deflagration, detonation, and deflagration-to-detonation transition (DDT). Existing studies on hydrogen explosion covering laboratory and field blasting test, numerical simulation utilizing various computational approaches, and theoretical derivation are reviewed and summarized. CFD modeling is currently one of the main research methods because of its cost effectiveness, though challenges existing in simulation hydrogen-air cloud detonation comparing with testing results. Apart from the properties of hydrogen-air cloud such as concentration, size and heterogeneity, environ-mental factors such as ignition, ventilation and obstacle are found to strongly influence the loading characteristics of hydrogen-air cloud explosion. Existing prediction approaches for estimating blast loading from hydrogen-air cloud explosion including the TNT equivalent method (TNT-EM), TNO multi-energy method (TNO MEM), and Baker-Strehlow-Tang method (BST) are primarily empirical based. Because of the inherited difference of hydrogen-air cloud from solid explosives and conventional flammable gases, the accu-racies of these approaches are still doubtable, which requires further study. (c) 2022 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:13705 / 13730
页数:26
相关论文
共 202 条
[91]  
Mazzini G, 2021, FUSION ENG DES, P171
[92]   Estimating Flame Speeds for Use with the BST Blast Curves [J].
Melton, Timothy A. ;
Marx, Jeffrey D. .
PROCESS SAFETY PROGRESS, 2009, 28 (01) :5-10
[93]  
meti.go, 2021, CAB DEC 6 STRAT EN P
[94]   Validation of CFD modelling of LH2 spread and evaporation against large-scale spill experiments [J].
Middha, Prankul ;
Ichard, Mathieu ;
Arntzen, Bjorn J. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2011, 36 (03) :2620-2627
[95]  
minenergo, 2021, ROADM HYDR DEV 2024
[96]   Self-ignition and explosion of a 13-MPa pressurized unsteady hydrogen jet under atmospheric conditions [J].
Mironov, V. N. ;
Penyazkou, O. G. ;
Ignatenko, D. G. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2015, 40 (16) :5749-5762
[97]   Laminar Burning Velocities of Hydrogen-Blended Methane-Air and Natural Gas-Air Mixtures, Calculated from the Early Stage of p(t) Records in a Spherical Vessel [J].
Mitu, Maria ;
Razus, Domnina ;
Schroeder, Volkmar .
ENERGIES, 2021, 14 (22)
[98]   Self-ignition and explosion during discharge of high-pressure hydrogen [J].
Mogi, Toshio ;
Kim, Dongjoon ;
Shiina, Hiroumi ;
Horiguchi, Sadashige .
JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2008, 21 (02) :199-204
[99]   Safety risk modeling and major accidents analysis of hydrogen and natural gas releases: A comprehensive risk analysis framework [J].
Mohammadfam, Iraj ;
Zarei, Esmaeil .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2015, 40 (39) :13653-13663
[100]  
Mokhtar KM, 2020, J LOSS PREVENT PROC, P63