Genotype x Environment interaction using AMMI and MTSI analysis for growth and yield attributes of radish (Raphanus sativus L.) under high temperature stress conditions of North Indian plains

被引:5
|
作者
Dhand, Amit [1 ]
Garg, Naveen [2 ]
机构
[1] Punjab Agr Univ, Dept Vegetable Sci, Ludhiana 141004, India
[2] Punjab Agr Univ, Reg Res Stn, Bathinda 151001, India
关键词
AMMI; G x E interaction; High temperature; MTSI; Radish; Stability; PHENOTYPIC STABILITY; GGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.scienta.2023.111880
中图分类号
S6 [园艺];
学科分类号
0902 ;
摘要
Thirty genotypes of Asiatic radish including nine released varieties were evaluated for four traits in six envi-ronments (sowing dates) during summer 2021 at Punjab Agricultural University, Regional Research Station, Bathinda, India. All the six sowing dates fall in summer to expose plants to varied degree of high temperature stress and included E1 (15 March), E2 (15 April), E3 (15 May), E4 (15 June), E5 (15 July) and E6 (15 August). The data were subjected to statistical analysis using Additive Main effects and Multiplicative Interaction (AMMI) and Multi-trait stability index (MTSI) models. The genotype (G) and environment (E) variances were significant for all traits. The contribution of environment to total variance was the highest for root weight (60.2%), plant weight (59.6%) and shoot weight (43.6%) whereas for shoot weight the contribution of genotype was the highest (45.0%). The G x E interaction (GEI) was significant for all traits and it was partitioned into two interaction principal components (IPCA 1 and IPCA 2). Both IPCA 1 and IPCA 2 were significant for three traits and their cumulative contribution to GEI variance was 79.9% for shoot weight, 83.4% for plant weight and 96.4% for marketable yield. However, for root weight only IPCA 1 was significant and explained 66.0% of the interaction variance. The residual variance was non-significant for all traits. The values of environmental means for various traits resulted in the identification of E1 and E6 as rich and others as poor environments. Three genotypes viz., G3 (Palak Mooli), G9 (RL-19-1) and G11 (RL-2210) were identified for poor environments based on marketable yield. One genotype viz., G9 was suitable for rich environment based on plant weight, root weight and shoot weight. Four genotypes viz., G5 (RL-9-1), G9, G17 (LSR-1-1-HP) and G3 were selected as stable due to their lower MTSI values. Six elite genotypes viz., G11, G3, G9, G2 (PMMS-1), G5 and G17 yielded 73.0 to 134.0% higher than standard check i.e. 'Pusa Chetki' (93.8 q/ha) and are recommended for further evaluation at multi -locations before being considered for commercial release.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] Genotype x Environment interaction: AMMI analysis of radish (Raphanus sativus) genotypes in different environments of Punjab
    Kaur, Inderdeep
    Singh, Rajinder
    Singh, Dilbag
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2020, 90 (06): : 1086 - 1092
  • [2] Genotype X environment interaction and yield stability of finger millet (Eleusine Coracana L.) genotypes based on AMMI, GGE and MTSI analysis in humid lowland areas of Ethiopia
    Kuru, Birkneh
    Abera, Netsanet
    Mulualem, Tafere
    FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2025, 322
  • [3] Evaluation of Genotype x Environment Interaction and Yield Stability Analysis in Peanut Under Phosphorus Stress Condition Using Stability Parameters of AMMI Model
    Ajay, B. C.
    Bera, S. K.
    Singh, A. L.
    Kumar, Narendra
    Gangadhar, K.
    Kona, Praveen
    AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 2020, 9 (04) : 477 - 486
  • [4] Genotype x Environment Interaction Analysis and Simultaneous Selection Using AMMI, BLUP, GGE Biplot and MTSI Under Drought Condition in Sweet Potato
    Gowda, K. H.
    Chauhan, V. B. S.
    Nedunchezhiyan, M.
    Pradeepika, C.
    Senthilkumar, K. M.
    Chandra, V.
    Byju, G.
    Sahoo, M. R.
    Pati, K.
    Arutselvan, R.
    JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT NUTRITION, 2025,
  • [5] Genotype x environment interaction in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L. Czern and coss) under Manipur valley conditions
    Sagolsem, Diana
    Singh, Naorem B.
    Devi, Th. Renuka
    Wani, Shabir H.
    Haribhushan, A.
    Singh, N. Gopimohan
    Laishram, J. M.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF GENETICS AND PLANT BREEDING, 2013, 73 (03) : 332 - 334
  • [6] AMMI Analysis of Genotype x Environment Interaction on Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris L.) Yield, Sugar Content and Production in Romania
    Oroian, Camelia
    Ugrutan, Florin
    Muresan, Iulia Cristina
    Oroian, Ioan
    Odagiu, Antonia
    Petrescu-Mag, Ioan Valentin
    Burduhos, Petru
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2023, 13 (10):
  • [7] Study of Genotype x Environment Interaction for Forage Yield in Oat (Avena sativa L.) with Joint Linear Regression Analysis and AMMI Analysis.
    H. A. Acciaresi
    H. O. Chidichimo
    C. B. Fusé
    Cereal Research Communications, 1997, 25 (1) : 55 - 62
  • [8] GENOTYPE BY ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION ANALYSIS OF WHEAT (Triticum aestivum L.) GRAIN YIELD UNDER RAIN-FED CONDITIONS IN ZAMBIA
    Tembo, B.
    SABRAO JOURNAL OF BREEDING AND GENETICS, 2021, 53 (04): : 609 - +
  • [9] Genotype-by-environment interaction and stability analysis of grain yield of bread wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes using AMMI and GGE biplot analyses
    Mullualem, Destaw
    Tsega, Alemu
    Mengie, Tesfaye
    Fentie, Desalew
    Kassa, Zelalem
    Fassil, Amare
    Wondaferew, Demekech
    Gelaw, Temesgen Assefa
    Astatkie, Tessema
    HELIYON, 2024, 10 (12)
  • [10] Genotype x environment interaction by AMMI and GGE-biplot analysis for sugar yield in three crop cycles of sugarcane (Saccharum officinirum L.) clones in Ethiopia
    Tena, Esayas
    Goshu, Frehiwot
    Mohamad, Hussein
    Tesfa, Melaku
    Tesfaye, Diribu
    Seife, Abebech
    COGENT FOOD & AGRICULTURE, 2019, 5 (01):