Development of an instrument to measure awareness and mitigation of bias in maternal healthcare

被引:6
作者
Bower, Kelly M. [1 ]
Kramer, Briana [2 ]
Warren, Nicole [1 ]
Ahmed, Saifuddin [3 ]
Callaghan-Koru, Jennifer [4 ]
Stierman, Elizabeth [2 ]
Wilson, Cheri [5 ]
Lawson, Shari [6 ]
Creanga, Andreea A. [2 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Nursing, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Int Hlth, Baltimore, MD USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Populat Family & Reprod Hlth, Baltimore, MD USA
[4] Univ Maryland, Dept Sociol Anthropol & Publ Hlth, Baltimore, MD USA
[5] Johns Hopkins Med, Off Divers Inclus & Hlth Equ, Baltimore, MD USA
[6] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Sch Med, Baltimore, MD USA
关键词
birth equity; disparities; health equity; implicit bias; inequity; maternal health; quality improvement; psychometrics; reliability; validity; IMPLICIT RACIAL/ETHNIC BIAS; CONTENT VALIDITY; NUMBER; HABIT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.100872
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Implicit bias among maternal healthcare professio-nals contributes to disrespectful care and racial and ethnic disparities in patient outcomes, and there is growing consensus that implicit bias train-ing is a key component of birth equity initiatives. A requirement for implicit bias training for healthcare professionals has become more widespread, but the impact training has is largely unknown, in part, because of a lack of validated instruments. Therefore, there is an urgent need for a psycho-metrically valid instrument for use in the evaluation of implicit bias training. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to develop a valid and reliable instru-ment to assess implicit bias awareness and mitigation practices among maternal care professionals and that can be used to evaluate interventions aimed at mitigating such bias in clinical practice. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted an instrument development and vali-dation study in 3 phases. In phase 1, item development, we generated a 43-item bank from literature and consultation and established content validity with subject matter experts. In phase 2, instrument development, we administered a revised set of 33 items to 307 nurses and midwives and conducted exploratory factor analysis to demonstrate construct validity and reliability. In phase 3, instrument evaluation, we confirmed the factor structure and compared the means of implicit bias training-exposed and -unexposed participants to further demonstrate construct validity with a representative state sample of 2096 maternal healthcare professionals (physicians, midwives, and nurses). RESULTS: Based on phase 2 results, we retained 23 items for the Bias in Maternal Health Care scale, which showed high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha, 0.86). We identified 3 subscales, namely a 9-item Bias Awareness subscale (Cronbach's alpha, 0.86), a 7-item Bias Mitiga-tion Practice subscale (Cronbach's alpha, 0.82), and a 7-item Bias Mitiga-tion Self-Efficacy subscale (Cronbach's alpha, 0.81). Validation of the Bias Awareness and Bias Mitigation Practice subscales in phase 3 demon-strated the instrument's high reliability (Cronbach's alpha 0.86 and 0.83, respectively) and discriminating performance among maternal healthcare professionals.CONCLUSION: We developed a reliable and valid instrument for mea-suring awareness and mitigation of bias among maternal healthcare pro-fessionals. It can be used to evaluate implicit bias training and other bias mitigation interventions in maternal healthcare settings.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
American College of Nurse Midwives, 2018, MIDW COL COMM CLIN S
[2]  
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 2017, RAC BIAS STAT POL
[3]  
[Anonymous], Understanding Implicit Bias
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2022, Pregnancy mortality surveillance system
[5]  
Association of Women's Health Obstetric and Neonatal Nurses, 2021, BIRTH EQ
[6]   SELF-EFFICACY - TOWARD A UNIFYING THEORY OF BEHAVIORAL CHANGE [J].
BANDURA, A .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1977, 84 (02) :191-215
[7]   Best Practices for Developing and Validating Scales for Health,Social, and Behavioral Research:A Primer [J].
Boateng, Godfred O. ;
Neilands, Torsten B. ;
Frongillo, Edward A. ;
Melgar-Quinonez, Hugo R. ;
Young, Sera L. .
FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 6
[8]  
Botwinick L., 2021, Healthc Exec, V36, P42
[9]  
California Legislative Information, 2019, CA SEN BILL NO 464
[10]   The Effect of an Intervention to Break the Gender Bias Habit for Faculty at One Institution: A Cluster Randomized, Controlled Trial [J].
Carnes, Molly ;
Devine, Patricia G. ;
Manwell, Linda Baier ;
Byars-Winston, Angela ;
Fine, Eve ;
Ford, Cecilia E. ;
Forscher, Patrick ;
Isaac, Carol ;
Kaatz, Anna ;
Magua, Wairimu ;
Palta, Mari ;
Sheridan, Jennifer .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2015, 90 (02) :221-230