Resource use efficiencies, environmental footprints and net ecosystem economic benefit of direct-seeded double-season rice in central China

被引:13
作者
Yu, Xing [1 ]
Xu, Le [1 ]
Yuan, Shen [1 ]
Yang, Guodong [1 ]
Xiang, Hongshun [1 ]
Fu, Yifan [1 ]
Huang, Jianliang [1 ]
Peng, Shaobing [1 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Agr Univ, Coll Plant Sci & Technol, MARA Key Lab Crop Ecophysiol & Farming Syst Middle, Natl Key Lab Crop Genet Improvement,Hubei Hongshan, Wuhan 430070, Hubei, Peoples R China
基金
中国博士后科学基金;
关键词
Carbon footprint; Direct seeding; Economic benefit; Nitrogen footprint; Resource use efficiency; NITROGEN; SYSTEMS; N2O; CHALLENGES; WATER; STRATEGIES; EMISSIONS; TILLAGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136249
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Intensive cropping systems with two or three harvests per year are vital to produce sufficient food for the growing population. Improvements in the sustainability of these systems are critical for global food security. Transplanted double-season rice (TPD), an important cropping system in China, is seriously threatened by various challenges such as labor shortage, poor resource use efficiency, high environmental footprint, and low profitability. These challenges could be potentially alleviated by shifting TPD to direct-seeded double-season rice (DSD). Due to the limited thermal energy, ultrashort-duration cultivars matured within 95 days have to be used in DSD in central China. However, it is unknown whether DSD with ultrashort-duration cultivars (DSDS) can improve resource use efficiency and reduce environmental costs compared with TPD in this region. This study aimed to compare the resource use efficiency (energy, water, labor, and fertilizer), carbon and nitrogen foot-prints, and net ecosystem economic benefit of DSDS and TPD with ultrashort-duration (TPDS) and medium -duration cultivars (TPDM). Results showed that total energy output was 222.0 GJ ha-1 in DSDS, which was comparable to that of TPDM but was significantly increased by 9.5% compared with TPDS. Compared with TPD (i.e. both TPDS and TPDM), the total energy input, labor input, water input, and nitrogen surplus in DSDS reduced by 16.9%, 53.2%, 36.8%, and 31.4%, respectively, leading to significant increases in energy use efficiency, labor productivity, water use efficiency, and nitrogen use efficiency. Furthermore, DSDS decreased direct CH4 and NH3 emissions and indirect carbon emission and reactive nitrogen losses from agronomic inputs, and consequently reduced carbon footprint by 28.6-42.7% and nitrogen footprint by 12.9-14.8% compared with TPD. As a result, the net ecosystem economic benefit in DSDS was significantly increased by 65.9-188.2% relative to TPD. These findings suggest that DSDS is a highly promising strategy to maintain high productivity with less resource inputs and environmental pressures but high economic benefits in central China.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [11] Transformation of the nitrogen cycle: Recent trends, questions, and potential solutions
    Galloway, James N.
    Townsend, Alan R.
    Erisman, Jan Willem
    Bekunda, Mateete
    Cai, Zucong
    Freney, John R.
    Martinelli, Luiz A.
    Seitzinger, Sybil P.
    Sutton, Mark A.
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2008, 320 (5878) : 889 - 892
  • [12] Energy use efficiency and cost-benefits analysis of rice cultivation: A study on conventional and alternative methods in Myanmar
    Htwe, Than
    Sinutok, Sutinee
    Chotikarn, Ponlachart
    Amin, Nowshad
    Akhtaruzzaman, Md
    Techato, Kuaanan
    Hossain, Tareq
    [J]. ENERGY, 2021, 214
  • [13] Exploration of feasible rice-based crop rotation systems to coordinate productivity, resource use efficiency and carbon footprint in central China
    Huang, Jiada
    Yu, Xing
    Zhang, Zuolin
    Peng, Shaobing
    Liu, Bin
    Tao, Xu
    He, Aibin
    Deng, Nanyan
    Zhou, Yuankun
    Cui, Kehui
    Wang, Fei
    Huang, Jianliang
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2022, 141
  • [14] IPCC, 2019, 2019 REF 2006 IPCC G, V4, P11
  • [15] Carbon sequestration potential, challenges, and strategies towards climate action in smallholder agricultural systems of South Asia
    Jat, Mangi L.
    Chakraborty, Debashis
    Ladha, Jagdish K.
    Parihar, Chhiter M.
    Datta, Ashim
    Mandal, Biswapati
    Nayak, Hari S.
    Maity, Pragati
    Rana, Dharamvir S.
    Chaudhari, Suresh K.
    Gerard, Bruno
    [J]. CROP AND ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 1 (01): : 86 - 101
  • [16] Water management to mitigate the global warming potential of rice systems: A global meta-analysis
    Jiang, Yu
    Carrijo, Daniela
    Huang, Shan
    Chen, Ji
    Balaine, Nimlesh
    Zhang, Weijian
    van Groenigen, Kees Jan
    Linquist, Bruce
    [J]. FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2019, 234 : 47 - 54
  • [17] Steady agronomic and genetic interventions are essential for sustaining productivity in intensive rice cropping
    Ladha, Jagdish K.
    Radanielson, Ando M.
    Rutkoski, Jessica Elaine
    Buresh, Roland J.
    Dobermann, Achim
    Angeles, Olivyn
    Pabuayon, Irish Lorraine B.
    Santos-Medellin, Christian
    Fritsche-Neto, Roberto
    Chivenge, Pauline
    Kohli, Ajay
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2021, 118 (45)
  • [18] Integrated assessment of carbon footprint, energy budget and net ecosystem economic efficiency from rice fields under different tillage modes in central China
    Li, Shi-hao
    Guo, Li-jin
    Cao, Cou-gui
    Li, Cheng-fang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 295
  • [19] NBSC, 2021, NAT BUR STAT CHIN NA
  • [20] Standardisation of chamber technique for CO2, N2O and CH4 fluxes measurements from terrestrial ecosystems
    Pavelka, Marian
    Acosta, Manuel
    Kiese, Ralf
    Altimir, Nuria
    Bruemmer, Christian
    Crill, Patrick
    Darenova, Eva
    Fuss, Roland
    Gielen, Bert
    Graf, Alexander
    Klemedtsson, Leif
    Lohila, Annalea
    Longdoz, Bernhard
    Lindroth, Anders
    Nilsson, Mats
    Jimenez, Sara Maranon
    Merbold, Lutz
    Montagnani, Leonardo
    Peichl, Matthias
    Pihlatie, Mari
    Pumpanen, Jukka
    Ortiz, Penelope Serrano
    Silvennoinen, Hanna
    Skiba, Ute
    Vestin, Patrik
    Weslien, Per
    Janous, Dalibor
    Kutsch, Werner
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL AGROPHYSICS, 2018, 32 (04) : 569 - +