Resource use efficiencies, environmental footprints and net ecosystem economic benefit of direct-seeded double-season rice in central China

被引:13
作者
Yu, Xing [1 ]
Xu, Le [1 ]
Yuan, Shen [1 ]
Yang, Guodong [1 ]
Xiang, Hongshun [1 ]
Fu, Yifan [1 ]
Huang, Jianliang [1 ]
Peng, Shaobing [1 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Agr Univ, Coll Plant Sci & Technol, MARA Key Lab Crop Ecophysiol & Farming Syst Middle, Natl Key Lab Crop Genet Improvement,Hubei Hongshan, Wuhan 430070, Hubei, Peoples R China
基金
中国博士后科学基金;
关键词
Carbon footprint; Direct seeding; Economic benefit; Nitrogen footprint; Resource use efficiency; NITROGEN; SYSTEMS; N2O; CHALLENGES; WATER; STRATEGIES; EMISSIONS; TILLAGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136249
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Intensive cropping systems with two or three harvests per year are vital to produce sufficient food for the growing population. Improvements in the sustainability of these systems are critical for global food security. Transplanted double-season rice (TPD), an important cropping system in China, is seriously threatened by various challenges such as labor shortage, poor resource use efficiency, high environmental footprint, and low profitability. These challenges could be potentially alleviated by shifting TPD to direct-seeded double-season rice (DSD). Due to the limited thermal energy, ultrashort-duration cultivars matured within 95 days have to be used in DSD in central China. However, it is unknown whether DSD with ultrashort-duration cultivars (DSDS) can improve resource use efficiency and reduce environmental costs compared with TPD in this region. This study aimed to compare the resource use efficiency (energy, water, labor, and fertilizer), carbon and nitrogen foot-prints, and net ecosystem economic benefit of DSDS and TPD with ultrashort-duration (TPDS) and medium -duration cultivars (TPDM). Results showed that total energy output was 222.0 GJ ha-1 in DSDS, which was comparable to that of TPDM but was significantly increased by 9.5% compared with TPDS. Compared with TPD (i.e. both TPDS and TPDM), the total energy input, labor input, water input, and nitrogen surplus in DSDS reduced by 16.9%, 53.2%, 36.8%, and 31.4%, respectively, leading to significant increases in energy use efficiency, labor productivity, water use efficiency, and nitrogen use efficiency. Furthermore, DSDS decreased direct CH4 and NH3 emissions and indirect carbon emission and reactive nitrogen losses from agronomic inputs, and consequently reduced carbon footprint by 28.6-42.7% and nitrogen footprint by 12.9-14.8% compared with TPD. As a result, the net ecosystem economic benefit in DSDS was significantly increased by 65.9-188.2% relative to TPD. These findings suggest that DSDS is a highly promising strategy to maintain high productivity with less resource inputs and environmental pressures but high economic benefits in central China.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] Selection of the most suitable sampling time for static chambers for the estimation of daily mean N2O flux from soils
    Alves, Bruno J. R.
    Smith, Keith A.
    Flores, Rilner A.
    Cardoso, Abmael S.
    Oliveira, William R. D.
    Jantalia, Claudia P.
    Urquiaga, Segundo
    Boddey, Robert M.
    [J]. SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 2012, 46 : 129 - 135
  • [2] Awika JM, 2011, ACS SYM SER, V1089, P1
  • [3] Saving of water and labor in a rice-wheat system with no-tillage and direct seeding technologies
    Bhushan, Lav
    Ladha, Jagdish K.
    Gupta, Raj K.
    Singh, S.
    Tirol-Padre, A.
    Saharawat, Ys.
    Gathala, M.
    Pathak, H.
    [J]. AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2007, 99 (05) : 1288 - 1296
  • [4] Global benefits of non-continuous flooding to reduce greenhouse gases and irrigation water use without rice yield penalty
    Bo, Yan
    Jaegermeyr, Jonas
    Yin, Zun
    Jiang, Yu
    Xu, Junzeng
    Liang, Hao
    Zhou, Feng
    [J]. GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2022, 28 (11) : 3636 - 3650
  • [5] Winter legume-rice rotations can reduce nitrogen pollution and carbon footprint while maintaining net ecosystem economic benefits
    Cai, Siyuan
    Pittelkow, Cameron M.
    Zhao, Xu
    Wang, Shenqiang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 195 : 289 - 300
  • [6] Energy conservation and greenhouse gas mitigation under different production systems in rice cultivation
    Chaudhary, V. P.
    Singh, K. K.
    Pratibha, G.
    Bhattacharyya, Ranjan
    Shamim, M.
    Srinivas, I.
    Patel, Anurag
    [J]. ENERGY, 2017, 130 : 307 - 317
  • [7] Producing more grain with lower environmental costs
    Chen, Xinping
    Cui, Zhenling
    Fan, Mingsheng
    Vitousek, Peter
    Zhao, Ming
    Ma, Wenqi
    Wang, Zhenlin
    Zhang, Weijian
    Yan, Xiaoyuan
    Yang, Jianchang
    Deng, Xiping
    Gao, Qiang
    Zhang, Qiang
    Guo, Shiwei
    Ren, Jun
    Li, Shiqing
    Ye, Youliang
    Wang, Zhaohui
    Huang, Jianliang
    Tang, Qiyuan
    Sun, Yixiang
    Peng, Xianlong
    Zhang, Jiwang
    He, Mingrong
    Zhu, Yunji
    Xue, Jiquan
    Wang, Guiliang
    Wu, Liang
    An, Ning
    Wu, Liangquan
    Ma, Lin
    Zhang, Weifeng
    Zhang, Fusuo
    [J]. NATURE, 2014, 514 (7523) : 486 - +
  • [8] Evaluation of resource and energy utilization, environmental and economic benefits of rice water-saving irrigation technologies in a rice-wheat rotation system
    Chen, Zongkui
    Li, Ping
    Jiang, Songsong
    Chen, Haiyu
    Wang, Jinping
    Cao, Cougui
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 757
  • [9] Closing yield gaps for rice self-sufficiency in China
    Deng, Nanyan
    Grassini, Patricio
    Yang, Haishun
    Huang, Jianliang
    Cassman, Kenneth G.
    Peng, Shaobing
    [J]. NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2019, 10 (1)
  • [10] Factors determining water use efficiency in aerobic rice
    Fukai, Shu
    Mitchell, Jaquie
    [J]. CROP AND ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 1 (01): : 24 - 40