Medical conscientious objection in abortion cases: scoping review

被引:0
作者
Sacchetin, Leticia Ferruzzi [1 ]
Souza, Andressa Pereira de [1 ]
Murgo, Camelia Santina [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oeste Paulista UNOESTE, Presidente Prudente, SP, Brazil
关键词
conscientious objection; abortion; religion; teaching base; LEGAL-ABORTION; MINAS-GERAIS; HEALTH-CARE; OBSTETRICIANS; GYNECOLOGISTS; SERVICES;
D O I
10.15448/1980-6108.2023.1.45000
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: conscientious objection makes it possible to ensure medical rights, but it is an obstacle to public health in Brazil. Aims: to carry out a Brazilian literature review assessing the motivation of health professionals who present conscientious objection in cases of legalized abortion. Methods: to this end, a PICO Brazilian literature review was carried out, with the guiding question: does medical technical teaching versus religiosity interfere with the option for conscientious objection in the face of legalized abortion? The following databases were used: Cochrane Library, Lilacs, PubMed, Scielo and Periodicals CAPES, using the descriptors "(Conscientious Objection)"; "(Conscientious Objection) AND (Religion)"; "(Conscientious Objection) AND (Medical Education)"; "(Conscientious Objection) AND (Religion) AND (Medical Education)" in Portuguese and in English plus the term "abortion". The search was carried out in January 2023 and limited to the period between 2016 and 2023. Results: initially, the search resulted in 1746 articles, of which only 17 were included. It can be observed that religion is an influence, however, the lack of the subject in medical schools causes doctors to act incorrectly or incompletely when objecting to conscience. Conclusions: this study will serve for future intervention projects with medical students, which minimize obstacles to accessing abortion.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   The midwife case and conscientious objection: new ways of framing abortion in Sweden [J].
Selberg, Rebecca .
INTERNATIONAL FEMINIST JOURNAL OF POLITICS, 2020, 22 (03) :312-334
[42]   Conscientious objection in legal abortion situations in Brazil: how to reconcile these rights? [J].
Schiocchet, Taysa ;
Castilho, Natalia Martinuzzi ;
de Aragao, Suellyn Mattos ;
Ortiz, Eduarda Miri .
CADERNOS DE DEREITO ACTUAL, 2023, (22) :350-372
[43]   Exploring pharmacists' views surrounding conscientious objection to abortion and implications in practice [J].
Maxwell, Clare ;
McKendrick, Jane ;
Hanlon, Claire ;
Penson, Peter ;
Fleming, Valerie .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACY PRACTICE, 2021, 29 (03) :258-264
[44]   THE RIGHT OF CONSCIENTIOUS OBJECTION WITH RESPECT TO ABORTION AND EUTHANASIA: A NEW ZEALAND REPORT [J].
Ahdar, Rex .
REVISTA GENERAL DE DERECHO CANONICO Y DERECHO ECLESIASTICO DEL ESTADO, 2021, (57)
[45]   Conscientious Objection in Australia: A Comparison between Abortion and Voluntary Assisted Dying [J].
Sifris, Ronli .
JOURNAL OF LAW AND MEDICINE, 2022, 29 (04) :1079-1089
[46]   Conscientious objection to abortion, the law and its implementation in Victoria, Australia: perspectives of abortion service providers [J].
Keogh, Louise Anne ;
Gillam, Lynn ;
Bismark, Marie ;
McNamee, Kathleen ;
Webster, Amy ;
Bayly, Christine ;
Newton, Danielle .
BMC MEDICAL ETHICS, 2019, 20 (1)
[47]   Conscientious objection to abortion, the law and its implementation in Victoria, Australia: perspectives of abortion service providers [J].
Louise Anne Keogh ;
Lynn Gillam ;
Marie Bismark ;
Kathleen McNamee ;
Amy Webster ;
Christine Bayly ;
Danielle Newton .
BMC Medical Ethics, 20
[48]   A narrative literature review of the impact of conscientious objection by health professionals on women's access to abortion worldwide 2013-2021 [J].
Davis, Jasmine Meredith ;
Haining, Casey Michelle ;
Keogh, Louise Anne .
GLOBAL PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 17 (09) :2190-2205
[49]   LEGAL PROTECTION AND LIMITS OF CONSCIENTIOUS OBJECTION: WHEN CONSCIENTIOUS OBJECTION IS UNETHICAL [J].
Dickens, Bernard M. .
MEDICINE AND LAW, 2009, 28 (02) :337-347
[50]   Conscientious objection to referrals for abortion: pragmatic solution or threat to women's rights? [J].
Nordberg, Eva M. Kibsgaard ;
Skirbekk, Helge ;
Magelssen, Morten .
BMC MEDICAL ETHICS, 2014, 15