Medical conscientious objection in abortion cases: scoping review

被引:0
作者
Sacchetin, Leticia Ferruzzi [1 ]
Souza, Andressa Pereira de [1 ]
Murgo, Camelia Santina [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oeste Paulista UNOESTE, Presidente Prudente, SP, Brazil
关键词
conscientious objection; abortion; religion; teaching base; LEGAL-ABORTION; MINAS-GERAIS; HEALTH-CARE; OBSTETRICIANS; GYNECOLOGISTS; SERVICES;
D O I
10.15448/1980-6108.2023.1.45000
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: conscientious objection makes it possible to ensure medical rights, but it is an obstacle to public health in Brazil. Aims: to carry out a Brazilian literature review assessing the motivation of health professionals who present conscientious objection in cases of legalized abortion. Methods: to this end, a PICO Brazilian literature review was carried out, with the guiding question: does medical technical teaching versus religiosity interfere with the option for conscientious objection in the face of legalized abortion? The following databases were used: Cochrane Library, Lilacs, PubMed, Scielo and Periodicals CAPES, using the descriptors "(Conscientious Objection)"; "(Conscientious Objection) AND (Religion)"; "(Conscientious Objection) AND (Medical Education)"; "(Conscientious Objection) AND (Religion) AND (Medical Education)" in Portuguese and in English plus the term "abortion". The search was carried out in January 2023 and limited to the period between 2016 and 2023. Results: initially, the search resulted in 1746 articles, of which only 17 were included. It can be observed that religion is an influence, however, the lack of the subject in medical schools causes doctors to act incorrectly or incompletely when objecting to conscience. Conclusions: this study will serve for future intervention projects with medical students, which minimize obstacles to accessing abortion.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Conscientious objection to abortion provision: Why context matters [J].
Harris, Laura Florence ;
Halpern, Jodi ;
Prata, Ndola ;
Chavkin, Wendy ;
Gerdts, Caitlin .
GLOBAL PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 13 (05) :556-566
[22]   Conscientious objection to abortion in the developing world: The correspondence argument [J].
Bhakuni, Himani ;
Miotto, Lucas .
DEVELOPING WORLD BIOETHICS, 2021, 21 (02) :90-95
[23]   The overprotection of conscientious objection in Chile's abortion regulation [J].
Marshall, Pablo ;
Zuniga, Yanira .
DEVELOPING WORLD BIOETHICS, 2021, 21 (02) :58-62
[24]   Abortion: At the Still Point of the Turning Conscientious Objection Debate [J].
Bedford, Elliott Louis .
HEC FORUM, 2012, 24 (02) :63-82
[25]   Proposal to inform European institutions regarding the regulation of conscientious objection to abortion [J].
Lertxundi, Roberto ;
Ibarrondo, Oliver ;
Merki-Feld, Gabriele S. ;
Rey-Novoa, Modesto ;
Rowlands, Sam ;
Mar, Javier .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CONTRACEPTION AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH CARE, 2016, 21 (03) :198-200
[26]   Conscientious Objection to Abortion and Equality Rights of Healthcare Professionals [J].
Arribas, Santiago Canamares .
IUS CANONICUM, 2024, 64 (127) :265-292
[27]   Prevalence of conscientious objection to legal abortion among clinicians in northern Ghana [J].
Awoonor-Williams, John K. ;
Baffoe, Peter ;
Ayivor, Philip K. ;
Fofie, Chris ;
Desai, Sheila ;
Chavkin, Wendy .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2018, 140 (01) :31-36
[28]   Quotas: Enabling Conscientious Objection to Coexist with Abortion Access [J].
Daniel Rodger ;
Bruce P. Blackshaw .
Health Care Analysis, 2021, 29 :154-169
[29]   Freedom of conscience in Europe? An analysis of three cases of midwives with conscientious objection to abortion [J].
Fleming, Valerie ;
Ramsayer, Beate ;
Zaksek, Teja Skodic .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2018, 44 (02) :104-108
[30]   Professionals' experience with conscientious objection to abortion in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: An interview study [J].
Magelssen, Morten ;
Ewnetu, Demelash Bezabih .
DEVELOPING WORLD BIOETHICS, 2021, 21 (02) :68-73