Medical conscientious objection in abortion cases: scoping review

被引:0
作者
Sacchetin, Leticia Ferruzzi [1 ]
Souza, Andressa Pereira de [1 ]
Murgo, Camelia Santina [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oeste Paulista UNOESTE, Presidente Prudente, SP, Brazil
关键词
conscientious objection; abortion; religion; teaching base; LEGAL-ABORTION; MINAS-GERAIS; HEALTH-CARE; OBSTETRICIANS; GYNECOLOGISTS; SERVICES;
D O I
10.15448/1980-6108.2023.1.45000
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: conscientious objection makes it possible to ensure medical rights, but it is an obstacle to public health in Brazil. Aims: to carry out a Brazilian literature review assessing the motivation of health professionals who present conscientious objection in cases of legalized abortion. Methods: to this end, a PICO Brazilian literature review was carried out, with the guiding question: does medical technical teaching versus religiosity interfere with the option for conscientious objection in the face of legalized abortion? The following databases were used: Cochrane Library, Lilacs, PubMed, Scielo and Periodicals CAPES, using the descriptors "(Conscientious Objection)"; "(Conscientious Objection) AND (Religion)"; "(Conscientious Objection) AND (Medical Education)"; "(Conscientious Objection) AND (Religion) AND (Medical Education)" in Portuguese and in English plus the term "abortion". The search was carried out in January 2023 and limited to the period between 2016 and 2023. Results: initially, the search resulted in 1746 articles, of which only 17 were included. It can be observed that religion is an influence, however, the lack of the subject in medical schools causes doctors to act incorrectly or incompletely when objecting to conscience. Conclusions: this study will serve for future intervention projects with medical students, which minimize obstacles to accessing abortion.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
[11]   ABORTION LAW IN AUSTRALIA: CONSCIENTIOUS OBJECTION AND IMPLICATIONS FOR ACCESS [J].
Haining, Casey M. ;
Willmott, Lindy ;
Keogh, Louise A. ;
White, Ben P. .
MONASH UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW, 2022, 48 (02) :238-271
[12]   Conscientious objection to participation in abortion by midwives and nurses: a systematic review of reasons [J].
Fleming, Valerie ;
Frith, Lucy ;
Luyben, Ans ;
Ramsayer, Beate .
BMC MEDICAL ETHICS, 2018, 19
[13]   Conscientious objection in medical practice [J].
Beca, Juan Pablo, I ;
Astete A, Carmen .
REVISTA MEDICA DE CHILE, 2015, 143 (04) :493-498
[14]   Conscientious objection to participation in abortion by midwives and nurses: a systematic review of reasons [J].
Valerie Fleming ;
Lucy Frith ;
Ans Luyben ;
Beate Ramsayer .
BMC Medical Ethics, 19
[15]   Conscientious objection to provision of legal abortion care [J].
Johnson, Brooke R., Jr. ;
Kismoedi, Eszter ;
Dragoman, Monica V. ;
Temmerman, Marleen .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2013, 123 :560-562
[16]   Conscience and conscientious objection: The midwife's role in abortion services [J].
Ramsayer, Beate ;
Fleming, Valerie .
NURSING ETHICS, 2020, 27 (08) :1645-1654
[17]   Conscientious objection to abortion and reproductive healthcare: a review of recent literature and implications for adolescents [J].
Morrell, Kathleen M. ;
Chavkin, Wendy .
CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 27 (05) :333-338
[18]   Conscientious objection and induced abortion in Europe [J].
Heino, Anna ;
Gissler, Mika ;
Apter, Dan ;
Fiala, Christian .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CONTRACEPTION AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH CARE, 2013, 18 (04) :231-233
[19]   Enforcing Conscientious Objection to Abortion in Medical Emergency Circumstances: Criminal and Unethical [J].
Schuklenk, Udo ;
Zolf, Benjamin .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2018, 18 (07) :60-61
[20]   Conscientious objection and waiting time for voluntary abortion in Italy [J].
Bo, Marco ;
Zotti, Carla Maria ;
Charrier, Lorena .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CONTRACEPTION AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH CARE, 2015, 20 (04) :272-282