Artificial intelligence in physical rehabilitation: A systematic review

被引:16
作者
Sumner, Jennifer [2 ,5 ]
Lim, Hui Wen [2 ]
Chong, Lin Siew [2 ]
Bundele, Anjali [2 ]
Mukhopadhyay, Amartya [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Kayambu, Geetha [4 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore, Yong Loo Lin Sch Med, Dept Med, Singapore, Singapore
[2] Natl Univ Hlth Syst, Alexandra Hosp, Med Affairs Res Innovat & Enterprise, Singapore, Singapore
[3] Natl Univ Singapore Hosp, Dept Med, Div Resp & Crit Care Med, Singapore, Singapore
[4] Natl Univ Singapore Hosp, Dept Rehabil, Singapore, Singapore
[5] Natl Univ Hlth Syst, Alexandra Hosp, Med Affairs Res Innovat & Enterprise, Singapore, Singapore
关键词
Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Physical rehabilitation; Systematic review; IMPACT; GAIT;
D O I
10.1016/j.artmed.2023.102693
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Background: Physical disabilities become more common with advancing age. Rehabilitation restores function, maintaining independence for longer. However, the poor availability and accessibility of rehabilitation limits its clinical impact. Artificial Intelligence (AI) guided interventions have improved many domains of healthcare, but whether rehabilitation can benefit from AI remains unclear.Methods: We conducted a systematic review of AI-supported physical rehabilitation technology tested in the clinical setting to understand: 1) availability of AI-supported physical rehabilitation technology; 2) its clinical effect; 3) and the barriers and facilitators to implementation. We searched in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Science Citation Index (Web of Science), CIRRIE (now NARIC), and OpenGrey.Results: We identified 9054 articles and included 28 projects. AI solutions spanned five categories: App-based systems, robotic devices that replace function, robotic devices that restore function, gaming systems and wearables. We identified five randomised controlled trials (RCTs), which evaluated outcomes relating to physical function, activity, pain, and health-related quality of life. The clinical effects were inconsistent. Implementation barriers included technology literacy, reliability, and user fatigue. Enablers included greater access to rehabilitation programmes, remote monitoring of progress, reduction in manpower requirements and lower cost.Conclusion: Application of AI in physical rehabilitation is a growing field, but clinical effects have yet to be studied rigorously. Developers must strive to conduct robust clinical evaluations in the real-world setting and appraise post implementation experiences.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
Alcaraz JC, 2018, 2018 IEEE 28 INT WOR, P17
[2]  
Alves Da Silva P., 2021, Eur J Prev Cardiol, V28, pzwab061.335
[3]   Effects of an Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Health Program on Workers With Neck/Shoulder Pain/Stiffness and Low Back Pain: Randomized Controlled Trial [J].
Anan, Tomomi ;
Kajiki, Shigeyuki ;
Oka, Hiroyuki ;
Fujii, Tomoko ;
Kawamata, Kayo ;
Mori, Koji ;
Matsudaira, Ko .
JMIR MHEALTH AND UHEALTH, 2021, 9 (09)
[4]  
Andrei D, 2015, 2015 IEEE 10TH JUBILEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON APPLIED COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND INFORMATICS (SACI), P27, DOI 10.1109/SACI.2015.7208233
[5]  
Ang Kai Keng, 2014, Front Neuroeng, V7, P30, DOI 10.3389/fneng.2014.00030
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2021, Rehabilitation
[7]   Patient Involvement With Home-Based Exercise Programs: Can Connected Health Interventions Influence Adherence? [J].
Argent, Rob ;
Daly, Ailish ;
Caulfield, Brian .
JMIR MHEALTH AND UHEALTH, 2018, 6 (03)
[8]   The promise of artificial intelligence: a review of the opportunities and challenges of artificial intelligence in healthcare [J].
Aung, Yuri Y. M. ;
Wong, David C. S. ;
Ting, Daniel S. W. .
BRITISH MEDICAL BULLETIN, 2021, 139 (01) :4-15
[9]   An interactive and low-cost full body rehabilitation framework based on 3D immersive serious games [J].
Avola, Danilo ;
Cinque, Luigi ;
Foresti, Gian Luca ;
Marini, Marco Raoul .
JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2019, 89 :81-100
[10]  
Bajwa Junaid, 2021, Future Healthc J, V8, pe188, DOI 10.7861/fhj.2021-0095