Formative assessment and student understanding of structure-function

被引:2
|
作者
Carter, Kelli P. [1 ]
Prevost, Luanna B. [2 ]
机构
[1] Pasco Hernando State Coll, Dept Biol Sci, Dade City, FL 33523 USA
[2] Univ S Florida, Dept Integrat Biol, Tampa, FL USA
关键词
formative assessment; function; structure; PHYSIOLOGY; THINKING; FACULTY; TASK;
D O I
10.1152/advan.00215.2022
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Formative assessment provides feedback to both students and instructors about the process of learning. The core concept structure-function provides a foundation upon which many topics in anatomy and physiology can be built across all levels of organization. This study contributes to existing research about student conceptual understanding of the core concepts. Implications for practitioners include the design of formative assessments and a suite of questions to be used to gauge student understanding of structure-function. The structure and function relationship is a core concept identified by physiology faculty. Prior research has shown this may be a difficult concept for students to understand. Formative written assessments, such as short answer essay questions, allow students to demonstrate their thinking by encouraging students to use their diverse ideas to construct their responses. Varying the context of a question, such as the inclusion of a scenario, may be used to provide insight into the different stages of students' emerging biological expertise. Short answer questions based on the core concept structure & LRARR;function were administered to students in a junior level General Physiology course and a sophomore level Human Anatomy and Physiology course at a large southeastern public university. Questions were based on the integumentary, muscular, digestive, and cardiovascular systems. Student responses were scored with a conceptual rubric developed for each question prompt as well as each organ system represented in the question prompts. Students were interviewed to determine if their responses to the short answer questions accurately reflected their thinking. Less than half of the student responses in this study demonstrated a conceptual understanding of the structure-function relationship. Students demonstrated different conceptual understanding of structure & LRARR;function concepts depending on the question prompt with a scenario versus the question prompt without a scenario. The question prompts with scenarios versus non-scenarios provided a different context, which may have influenced student explanations. These results suggest that instructors should provide students with questions in varying contexts to allow students to demonstrate their heterogeneous ideas about a concept.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Formative assessment provides feedback to both students and instructors about the process of learning. The core concept structure-function provides a foundation upon which many topics in anatomy and physiology can be built across all levels of organization. This study contributes to existing research about student conceptual understanding of the core concepts. Implications for practitioners include the design of formative assessments and a suite of questions to be used to gauge student understanding of structure-function.
引用
收藏
页码:615 / 624
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Insights on the Quest for the Structure-Function Relationship of the Mitochondrial Pyruvate Carrier
    Quesnay, Jose Edwin Neciosup
    Pollock, Naomi L.
    Nagampalli, Raghavendra Sashi Krishna
    Lee, Sarah C.
    Balakrishnan, Vijayakumar
    Dias, Sandra Martha Gomes
    Moraes, Isabel
    Dafforn, Tim R.
    Ambrosio, Andre Luis Berteli
    BIOLOGY-BASEL, 2020, 9 (11): : 1 - 17
  • [32] Freshwater ecosystem structure-function relationships: from theory to application
    Sandin, Leonard
    Solimini, Angelo G.
    FRESHWATER BIOLOGY, 2009, 54 (10) : 2017 - 2024
  • [33] Unlocking student engagement and achievement: The impact of leaderboard gamification in online formative assessment for engineering education
    Cigdem, Harun
    Ozturk, Mustafa
    Karabacak, Yusuf
    Atik, Nuri
    Gurkan, Serkan
    Aldemir, Mevlana Halit
    EDUCATION AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES, 2024, 29 (18) : 24835 - 24860
  • [34] Formative Student Assessment Intelligent Management System Based on B/S
    He, Caixia
    2024 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATICS EDUCATION AND COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY APPLICATIONS, IECA 2024, 2024, : 199 - 203
  • [35] Application of Formative Assessment in Teaching of Cell Biology for Medical International Student
    Liu, Xiao-Ying
    Pan, Zhi-Fang
    Gao, Zhi-Qin
    Yu, Wen-Jing
    Liu, Shun-Mei
    2016 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED EDUCATION AND MANAGEMENT (ICAEM 2016), 2016, : 247 - 250
  • [36] Student involvement and management of students' workload in formative assessment in higher education
    Hortigueela-Alcala, David
    Perez-Pueyo, Angel
    Lopez-Pastor, Victor
    RELIEVE-REVISTA ELECTRONICA DE INVESTIGACION Y EVALUACION EDUCATIVA, 2015, 21 (01): : 1 - 15
  • [37] Student Poster Conferences as a Formative, Authentic, Inclusive and Sustainable Assessment Practice
    Sims, Danica
    Swales, Catherine
    Aitken, Debbie
    CLINICAL TEACHER, 2025, 22 (02)
  • [38] Comparison of teacher and student perceptions of formative assessment feedback practices and association with individual student characteristics
    van der Kleij, Fabienne M.
    TEACHING AND TEACHER EDUCATION, 2019, 85 : 175 - 189
  • [39] IS STUDENT ENGAGEMENT HIGHER IN MOOCS WITH APPROPRIATE FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT AND FEEDBACK PRACTICES?
    Floratos, Nikolaos
    Guasch, Teresa
    Espasa, Anna
    ICERI2016: 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF EDUCATION, RESEARCH AND INNOVATION, 2016, : 512 - 519
  • [40] Formative Assessment as an Online Instruction Intervention: Student Engagement, Outcomes, and Perceptions
    Chen, Zexuan
    Jiao, Jianli
    Hu, Kexin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISTANCE EDUCATION TECHNOLOGIES, 2021, 19 (01) : 1 - 16