Risk factors for epidural anesthesia blockade failure in cesarean section: a retrospective study

被引:3
作者
Chao, Wei-Hsiang [1 ]
Cheng, Wen-Shan [1 ]
Hu, Li-Ming [1 ]
Liao, Chia-Chih [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, 5 Fuxing St, Taoyuan City 33305, Taiwan
[2] Chang Gung Univ, Coll Med, Taoyuan City, Taiwan
关键词
Epidural failure; Previous epidural history; Risk factors; Cesarean section; LABOR ANALGESIA; DELIVERY ANESTHESIA; CONVERSION; SALINE; AIR; IDENTIFICATION; RESISTANCE; SINGLE;
D O I
10.1186/s12871-023-02284-w
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background Epidural anesthesia (EA) is the regional anesthesia technique preferred over spinal anesthesia for pregnant women requiring cesarean section and post-operative pain control. EA failure requires additional sedation or conversion to general anesthesia (GA). This may be hazardous during sedation or GA conversion because of potentially difficult airways. Therefore, this retrospective study aimed to determine the risk factors for epidural failure during cesarean section anesthesia. Methods We retrospectively analyzed parturients who underwent cesarean section under EA and catheterization at the Chang Gung Memorial Hospital in Taiwan between January 1 and December 31, 2018. Patient data were collected from the medical records. EA failure was defined as the administration of any intravenous anesthetic at any time during a cesarean section, converting it into GA. Results A total of 534 parturients who underwent cesarean section were recruited for this study. Of them, 94 (17.6%) experienced EA failure during cesarean section. Compared to the patients with successful EA, those with EA failure were younger (33.0 years vs. 34.7 years), had received EA previously (60.6% vs. 37%), were parous (72.3% vs. 55%), and had a shorter waiting time (14.9 min vs. 16.5 min) (p < 0.05). Younger age (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.86-0.95), history of epidural analgesia (OR 2.61, 95% CI 1.38-4.94), and shorter waiting time (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.87-0.97) were estimated to be significantly associated with a higher risk of epidural anesthesia failure. Conclusion The retrospective study found that parturients of younger age, previous epidural catheterization history, and inadequate waiting time may have a higher risk of EA failure. Previous epidural catheterization increased the risk of EA failure by 2.6-fold compared to patient with no history of catheterization.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] Inadequate pain relief with labor epidurals: a multivariate analysis of associated factors
    Agaram, R.
    Douglas, M. J.
    McTaggart, R. A.
    Gunka, V.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA, 2009, 18 (01) : 10 - 14
  • [2] Regional block versus general anaesthesia for caesarean section and neonatal outcomes: a population-based study
    Algert, Charles S.
    Bowen, Jennifer R.
    Giles, Warwick B.
    Knoblanche, Greg E.
    Lain, Samantha J.
    Roberts, Christine L.
    [J]. BMC MEDICINE, 2009, 7
  • [3] Risk factors for failed conversion of labor epidural analgesia to cesarean delivery anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational trials
    Bauer, M. E.
    Kountanis, J. A.
    Tsen, L. C.
    Greenfield, M. L.
    Mhyrea, J. M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA, 2012, 21 (04) : 294 - 309
  • [4] Quality of analgesia when air versus saline is used for identification of the epidural space in the parturient
    Beilin, Y
    Arnold, I
    Telfeyan, C
    Bernstein, HH
    Hossain, S
    [J]. REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2000, 25 (06) : 596 - 599
  • [5] Analgesic efficacy and adverse effects of epidural morphine compared to parenteral opioids after elective caesarean section: A systematic review
    Bonnet, Marie-Pierre
    Mignon, Alexandre
    Mazoit, Jean-Xavier
    Ozier, Yves
    Marret, Emmanuel
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2010, 14 (09) : 894.e1 - 894.e9
  • [6] Single-dose, sustained-release epidural morphine in the management of postoperative pain after elective Cesarean delivery: Results of a multicenter randomized controlled study
    Carvalho, B
    Riley, E
    Cohen, SE
    Gambling, D
    Palmer, C
    Huffnagle, HJ
    Polley, L
    Muir, H
    Segal, S
    Lihou, C
    Manvelian, G
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2005, 100 (04) : 1150 - 1158
  • [7] Labor Epidural Analgesia to Cesarean Section Anesthetic Conversion Failure: A National Survey
    Desai, Neel
    Gardner, Andrew
    Carvalho, Brendan
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2019, 2019
  • [8] Difficult and failed intubation in 3430 obstetric general anaesthetics*
    Djabatey, E. A.
    Barclay, P. M.
    [J]. ANAESTHESIA, 2009, 64 (11) : 1168 - 1171
  • [9] Epidural extension failure in obese women is comparable to that of non-obese women
    Eley, V. A.
    Chin, A.
    Tham, I.
    Poh, J.
    Aujla, P.
    Glasgow, E.
    Brown, H.
    Steele, K.
    Webb, L.
    van Zundert, A.
    [J]. ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2018, 62 (06) : 839 - 847
  • [10] A randomised comparison of 0.5% bupivacaine with a lidocaine/epinephrine/fentanyl mixture for epidural top-up for emergency caesarean section after "low dose" epidural for labour
    Goring-Morris, J
    Russell, IF
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA, 2006, 15 (02) : 109 - 114