When and why does economic inequality predict prosocial behaviour? Examining the role of interpersonal trust among different targets

被引:8
作者
Lin, Jing [1 ]
Li, Wenqi [2 ,3 ]
Guo, Zhen [1 ]
Kou, Yu [1 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Normal Univ, Inst Dev Psychol, Natl Demonstrat Ctr Expt Psychol Educ, Beijing Key Lab Appl Expt Psychol, 19 Xinjiekouwai St, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Univ, Dept Psychol, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[3] Nanjing Univ, Yuxiu Postdoctoral Inst, Nanjing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
economic inequality; interaction targets; interpersonal trust; prosocial behaviour; wealth; CROSS-SECTIONAL ANALYSES; INCOME INEQUALITY; RECIPROCITY; PROVISION; MECHANISM; WEALTH; BIAS; US;
D O I
10.1002/ejsp.3007
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Previous research suggests that economic inequality has caused a wide range of negative societal impacts. However, little is known about how economic inequality influences prosocial behaviour as a socioecological environment determinant. In five studies (N = 62,342), we examined whether economic inequality reduces prosocial behaviour by decreasing interpersonal trust and the moderation role of interpersonal targets. Studies 1, 2a, and 2b showed that interpersonal trust mediated the negative relationship between perceived economic inequality and prosocial behaviour. In Study 3, we used data from the World Values Survey to explore the relation between inequality and trust and found that it was moderated by the closeness of trust targets. In Study 4, we demonstrated that economic inequality only reduced trust and prosocial behaviour towards strangers, but not among friends and family. Taken together, the current research shed light on how economic inequality undermines trust and negatively impacts prosocial behaviour among different targets.
引用
收藏
页码:136 / 153
页数:18
相关论文
共 85 条
[1]   Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: Preliminary data in healthy white women [J].
Adler, NE ;
Epel, ES ;
Castellazzo, G ;
Ickovics, JR .
HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 19 (06) :586-592
[2]   Trust, Conflict, and Cooperation: A Meta-Analysis [J].
Balliet, Daniel ;
Van Lange, Paul A. M. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2013, 139 (05) :1090-1112
[3]   Understanding Economic Inequality Through the Lens of Caste [J].
Bapuji, Hari ;
Chrispal, Snehanjali .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2020, 162 (03) :533-551
[4]   INEQUALITY AND TRUST: NEW EVIDENCE FROM PANEL DATA [J].
Barone, Guglielmo ;
Mocetti, Sauro .
ECONOMIC INQUIRY, 2016, 54 (02) :794-809
[5]   Egalitarianism and Competitiveness [J].
Bartling, Bjoern ;
Fehr, Ernst ;
Marechal, Michel Andre ;
Schunk, Daniel .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2009, 99 (02) :93-98
[6]  
Bates D., 2014, lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4, P1, DOI [10.18637/jss.v067.i01, DOI 10.18637/JSS.V067.I01]
[7]   TRUST, RECIPROCITY, AND SOCIAL-HISTORY [J].
BERG, J ;
DICKHAUT, J ;
MCCABE, K .
GAMES AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR, 1995, 10 (01) :122-142
[8]   Status anxiety mediates the positive relationship between income inequality and sexualization [J].
Blake, Khandis R. ;
Brooks, Robert C. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2019, 116 (50) :25029-25033
[9]   Yes, But What's the Mechanism? (Don't Expect an Easy Answer) [J].
Bullock, John G. ;
Green, Donald P. ;
Ha, Shang E. .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 98 (04) :550-558
[10]  
Buttrick NR, 2017, SOC PERSONAL PSYCHOL, V11, DOI 10.1111/spc3.12304