The Cultural Context of Plagiarism and Research Misconduct in the Asian Region

被引:15
|
作者
Rodrigues, Flinta [1 ,2 ]
Gupta, Prakash [3 ,4 ]
Khan, Afzal Parvez [5 ]
Chatterjee, Tulika [6 ]
Sandhu, Nimrat Kaur [7 ]
Gupta, Latika [8 ,9 ,10 ,11 ]
机构
[1] Seth Gordhandas Sunderdas Med Coll, Dept Med, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
[2] King Edward Mem Hosp, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
[3] St Louis Univ Hosp Sacred Heart, Dept Med, Baguio, Benguet, Philippines
[4] Virgen Milagrosa Univ Fdn, Coll Med, Dept Med, San Carlos City, Pangasinan, Philippines
[5] Univ Coll Med Sci, Dept Med, Delhi, India
[6] Univ Illinois, Dept Internal Med, Coll Med Peoria, Peoria, IL USA
[7] Univ Calif Merced, Dept Publ Hlth, Merced, CA USA
[8] Royal Wolverhampton Hosp NHS Trust, Dept Rheumatol, Wolverhampton, England
[9] Sandwell & West Birmingham Hosp NHS Trust, City Hosp, Birmingham, England
[10] Univ Manchester, Ctr Musculoskeletal Res, Sch Biol Sci, Div Musculoskeletal & Dermatol Sci, Manchester, England
[11] Royal Wolverhampton Hosp NHS Trust, Dept Rheumatol, Wolverhampton WV10 0QP, England
关键词
Research Misconduct; Plagiarism; Publication Ethics; Retraction; South Asia; East Asia; Southeast Asia; PUBLICATION MISCONDUCT; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT; PERCEPTIONS; RETRACTIONS; PREVENTION; EDUCATION; KNOWLEDGE; ETHICS;
D O I
10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e88
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Plagiarism is one of the most frequent forms of research misconduct in South and East Asian countries. This narrative review examines the factors contributing to research misconduct, emphasizing plagiarism, particularly in South, East and Southeast Asian countries. We conducted a PubMed and Scopus search using the terms plagiarism, Asia, South Asia, East Asia, Southeast Asia, research misconduct and retractions in January of 2022. Articles with missing abstracts, incomplete information about plagiarism, publication dates before 2010, and those unrelated to South, East, and Southeast Asian countries were excluded. The retraction watch database was searched for articles retracted between 9th January 2020 to 9th January 2022. A total of 159 articles were identified, of which 21 were included in the study using the database search criteria mentioned above. The review of articles identified a lack of training in scientific writing and research ethics, publication pressure, permissive attitudes, and inadequate regulatory measures as the primary reasons behind research misconduct in scientific publications. Plagiarism remains a common cause of unethical publications and retractions in regions of Asia (namely South, East and Southeast). Researchers lack training in scientific writing, and substantial gaps exist in understanding various forms of plagiarism, which heavily contribute to the problem. There is an urgent need to foster high research ethics standards and adhere to journal policies. Providing appropriate training in scientific writing among researchers may help improve the knowledge of different types of plagiarism and promote the use of antiplagiarism software, leading to a substantial reduction in the problem.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A review of the types of scientific misconduct in biomedical research
    Kumar M.N.
    Journal of Academic Ethics, 2008, 6 (3) : 211 - 228
  • [42] How prevalent is academic misconduct in management research?
    Hopp, Christian
    Hoover, Gary A.
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2017, 80 : 73 - 81
  • [43] On "intent" in research misconduct
    Yeo-Teh, Nicole Shu Ling
    Tang, Bor Luen
    ACCOUNTABILITY IN RESEARCH-ETHICS INTEGRITY AND POLICY, 2024,
  • [44] Combating Scientific Misconduct: The Role of Focused Workshops in Changing Attitudes Towards Plagiarism
    Rathore, Farooq A.
    Fatima, Noor E.
    Farooq, Fareeha
    Mansoor, Sahibzada N.
    CUREUS, 2018, 10 (05):
  • [45] Academic dishonesty and misconduct: Curbing plagiarism in the Muslim world
    Moten, Abdul Rashid
    INTELLECTUAL DISCOURSE, 2014, 22 (02) : 167 - 189
  • [46] CAN BETTER INFORMATION TACKLE PLAGIARISM AND ACADEMIC MISCONDUCT?
    Santos, B.
    Goncalves, J.
    Almeida, P.
    11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF EDUCATION, RESEARCH AND INNOVATION (ICERI2018), 2018, : 873 - 873
  • [47] The landscape of urological retractions: the prevalence of reported research misconduct
    Mena, Jorge D.
    Ndoye, Medina
    Cohen, Andrew J.
    Kamal, Puneet
    Breyer, Benjamin N.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 124 (01) : 174 - 179
  • [48] CROSS-CULTURAL PERSPECTIVES OF SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT
    Momen, Hooman
    Gollogly, Laragh
    MEDICINE AND LAW, 2007, 26 (03): : 409 - 416
  • [49] Integrity and misconduct in biomedical research
    Schonhaut B, Luisa
    REVISTA CHILENA DE PEDIATRIA-CHILE, 2019, 90 (02): : 217 - 221
  • [50] Research fundamentals VI: Misconduct in biomedical research
    Biros, MH
    Fish, SS
    Taggart, P
    ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1999, 6 (08) : 840 - 848