Using machine learning to retrospectively predict self-reported gambling problems in Quebec

被引:9
作者
Murch, W. Spencer [1 ]
Kairouz, Sylvia [1 ,2 ]
Dauphinais, Sophie [1 ]
Picard, Elyse [1 ]
Costes, Jean-Michel [1 ]
French, Martin [1 ]
机构
[1] Concordia Univ, Dept Sociol & Anthropol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[2] Concordia Univ, Dept Sociol & Anthropol, 1455 Maisonneuve Blvd W, Montreal, PQ H2G 1M8, Canada
关键词
Behaviour tracking; behavioural addiction; machine learning; online gambling; problem gambling; random Forest; GAMBLERS; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1111/add.16179
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and AimsParticipating in online gambling is associated with an increased risk for experiencing gambling-related harms, driving calls for more effective, personalized harm prevention initiatives. Such initiatives depend on the development of models capable of detecting at-risk online gamblers. We aimed to determine whether machine learning algorithms can use site data to detect retrospectively at-risk online gamblers indicated by the Problem Gambling Severity Index (PGSI). DesignExploratory comparison of six prominent supervised machine learning methods (decision trees, random forests, K-nearest neighbours, logistic regressions, artificial neural networks and support vector machines) to predict problem gambling risk levels reported on the PGSI. Setting (formerly ), an online gambling platform operated by Loto-Quebec (a provincial Crown Corporation) in Quebec, Canada. ParticipantsN = 9145 adults (18+) who completed the survey measure and placed at least one bet using real money on the site. MeasurementsParticipants completed the PGSI, a self-report questionnaire with validated cut-offs denoting a moderate-to-high-risk (PGSI 5+) or high-risk (PGSI 8+) for experiencing past-year gambling-related problems. Participants agreed to release additional data about the preceding 12 months from their user accounts. Predictor variables (144) were derived from users' transactions, apparent betting behaviours, listed demographics and use of responsible gambling tools on the platform. FindingsOur best classification models (random forests) for the PGSI 5+ and 8+ outcome variables accounted for 84.33% (95% CI = 82.24-86.41) and 82.52% (95% CI = 79.96-85.08) of the total area under their receiver operating characteristic curves, respectively. The most important factors in these models included the frequency and variability of participants' betting behaviour and repeat engagement on the site. ConclusionsMachine learning algorithms appear to be able to classify at-risk online gamblers using data generated from their use of online gambling platforms. They may enable personalized harm prevention initiatives, but are constrained by trade-offs between their sensitivity and precision.
引用
收藏
页码:1569 / 1578
页数:10
相关论文
共 57 条
  • [1] American Psychiatric Association, 2013, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders DSM-5, V5th ed., DOI [10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596, DOI 10.1176/APPI.BOOKS.9780890425596]
  • [2] Using artificial intelligence algorithms to predict self-reported problem gambling with account-based player data in an online casino setting
    Auer, Michael
    Griffiths, Mark D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GAMBLING STUDIES, 2023, 39 (03) : 1273 - 1294
  • [3] Big Data and Machine Learning in Health Care
    Beam, Andrew L.
    Kohane, Isaac S.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2018, 319 (13): : 1317 - 1318
  • [4] Benjamin R, 2019, CAPTIVATING TECHNOLOGY, P1
  • [5] Random forests
    Breiman, L
    [J]. MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) : 5 - 32
  • [6] Review of mHealth Gambling Apps in Australia
    Brownlow, Luke
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GAMBLING ISSUES, 2021, 47 : 1 - 19
  • [7] The Extent and Distribution of Gambling-Related Harms and the Prevention Paradox in a British Population Survey
    Canale, Natale
    Vieno, Alessio
    Griffiths, Mark D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL ADDICTIONS, 2016, 5 (02) : 204 - 212
  • [8] CHINCHOR N, 1992, FOURTH MESSAGE UNDERSTANDING CONFERENCE (MUC-4), P22
  • [9] NEAREST NEIGHBOR PATTERN CLASSIFICATION
    COVER, TM
    HART, PE
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION THEORY, 1967, 13 (01) : 21 - +
  • [10] Cramer JS., 2002, SSRN J, DOI [10.2139/ssrn.360300, DOI 10.2139/SSRN.360300]