Tectonic shifts in global science: US-China scientific competition and the Muslim-majority science systems in multipolar science

被引:3
作者
Oldac, Yusuf Ikbal [1 ]
机构
[1] Lingnan Univ, Hong Kong Res Grants Council Postdoctoral Fellow, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Global science; Muslim-majority countries; The United States; China; Geopolitics; HIGHER-EDUCATION; PROXIMITY;
D O I
10.1007/s10734-023-01028-6
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Global science is set to experience different times in the 2020s. China surpasses the USA in terms of the number of scientific papers in 2020 in most scientific databases. This scenario is expected to have implications not only in East Asia but also beyond the region. Against this backdrop, this paper investigates the scientific influence of the US-China competition on six major Muslim-majority science systems. Multiple data sources are used to collect data for the bibliometric analyses, which include the trend analysis of collaboration patterns, discipline-based collaborations, authorship patterns for responsibility in collaborations, and citation premium of collaborations with the USA versus China. All the analyses consistently demonstrate that the USA is losing its scientific influence on the selected Muslim-majority science systems to China. Analysis results indicate an astonishing increase in collaborations with China-based scientists in the last decade. Half of the selected Muslim-majority science systems collaborate more with China-based scientists, whereas the other half collaborate more with the USA in 2021, indicating a fifty-fifty split. The collaborations with China-based authors garner higher citation premiums for the selected Muslim-majority science systems than the collaborations with the USA.
引用
收藏
页码:637 / 659
页数:23
相关论文
共 54 条
  • [1] Adams J., 2018, FRONTIERS RES METRIC, V3, P12, DOI DOI 10.3389/FRMA.2018.00012
  • [2] Al-Tamimi N., 2021, routledge handbook on China-Middle East relations, P137
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2002, Rationality and freedom
  • [4] The negative effects of citing with a national orientation in terms of recognition: National and international citations in natural-sciences papers from Germany, the Netherlands, and the UK
    Bornmann, Lutz
    Adams, Jonathan
    Leydesdorff, Loet
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2018, 12 (03) : 931 - 949
  • [5] Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment
    Boschma, RA
    [J]. REGIONAL STUDIES, 2005, 39 (01) : 61 - 74
  • [6] Caniels M. C., 2014, SOCIAL DYNAMICS INNO, P247
  • [7] Castells M., 2000, The Rise of the Network Society, The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture, DOI [10.1002/9781444319514, DOI 10.1002/9781444319514]
  • [8] A big picture: bibliometric study of academic publications from post-Soviet countries
    Chankseliani, Maia
    Lovakov, Andrey
    Pislyakov, Vladimir
    [J]. SCIENTOMETRICS, 2021, 126 (10) : 8701 - 8730
  • [9] Chen D., 2019, DEEPENING COOPERATIO, DOI [10.30573/KS--2019-DP53, DOI 10.30573/KS--2019-DP53]
  • [10] Follow the leader: On the relationship between leadership and scholarly impact in international collaborations
    Chinchilla-Rodriguez, Zaida
    Sugimoto, Cassidy R.
    Lariviere, Vincent
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (06):