Closed reduction and plaster immobilization: an alternative solution for patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip who failed Pavlik harness treatment

被引:3
作者
Zhou, Ping [1 ]
Zhang, Jianqiang [2 ]
Dan, Tangzi [2 ]
Xu, Taotao [1 ]
Kang, Xiaopeng [1 ]
Hang, Yong [1 ]
Zhou, You [1 ]
机构
[1] Kunming Childrens Hosp, Dept Orthoped, 288 Qianxing Rd, Kunming 650100, Peoples R China
[2] Kunming Med Univ, Grad Sch, Kunming, Peoples R China
关键词
cast; closed reduction; developmental dysplasia of hip; harness failure; RESIDUAL DYSPLASIA; MANAGEMENT; ULTRASOUND; DISLOCATION; FAILURE; SUCCESS;
D O I
10.1111/ans.18285
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundThe current study aims to investigate the clinical efficacy of closed reduction and cast immobilization for patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) who failed Pavlik harness treatment. MethodsPatients with DDH who underwent cast immobilization under general anaesthesia after the failure of the Pavlik harness or Tubingen brace treatment between January 2015 and December 2020 were retrospectively recruited. General information, including Graf classification of initial diagnosis, initial treatment, age of cast immobilization, IHDI classification, AI index, avascular necrosis (AVN), and residual dysplasia, was collected. The incidence of AVN and late acetabular dysplasia (LACD) was also estimated. Moreover, factors related to AVN and LACD were investigated by multiple logistic regression analysis. ResultsThirty-four patients (47 hips) were finally included in the current study. Of these patients, 31 hips (66.0%) were successfully treated with closed reduction and cast immobilization. Open reduction was successfully performed in 16 hips (34.0%). Till the latest follow-up, LACD and AVN were found in 13 (27.7%) and 10 (21.3%) hips, respectively. In the open reduction group, type III and IV of the IHDI classification and type IV of the Ultrasound Graf classification were significantly higher when compared with the closed reduction group. Multiple logistic regression showed that failure of closed reduction was related to the initial types of the Ultrasound Graf and IHDI classifications. ConclusionsAlthough the success rate of closed reduction after early harness failure in DDH is only 66%, we still advocate closed reduction as a first-line treatment for children who have failed sling treatment. Even if closed reduction fails, open reduction can still achieve acceptable results.
引用
收藏
页码:663 / 668
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Residual dysplasia after successful Pavlik harness treatment - Early ultrasound predictors [J].
Alexiev, VA ;
Harcke, HT ;
Kumar, SJ .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS, 2006, 26 (01) :16-23
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2000, Pediatrics, V105, P896
[3]   Should closed reduction of the dislocated hip be attempted after failed Pavlik harness treatment in developmental dysplasia of the hip? [J].
Arneill, M. ;
Cosgrove, A. ;
Robinson, E. .
BONE & JOINT OPEN, 2021, 2 (08) :594-598
[4]   Avascular necrosis following closed reduction for treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip: a systematic review [J].
Bradley, Catharine S. ;
Perry, Daniel C. ;
Wedge, John H. ;
Murnaghan, M. L. ;
Kelley, Simon P. .
JOURNAL OF CHILDRENS ORTHOPAEDICS, 2016, 10 (06) :627-632
[5]   Evidence-based Management of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip [J].
Cooper, Anthony Philip ;
Doddabasappa, Siddesh Nandi ;
Mulpuri, Kishore .
ORTHOPEDIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2014, 45 (03) :341-+
[6]   Plastazote abduction orthosis in the management of neonatal hip instability [J].
Eberle, CF .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS, 2003, 23 (05) :607-616
[7]  
[付喆 Fu Zhe], 2016, [中华骨科杂志, Chinese Journal of Orthopedics], V36, P399
[8]   Closed reduction of congenital dislocation of the hip: prediction factors and results [J].
Galek-Aldridge, Michal S. ;
de Graeff, Jan Jaap ;
Struijs, Peter A. A. .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS-PART B, 2018, 27 (05) :391-393
[10]   Use of an abduction brace for developmental dysplasia of the hip after failure of Pavlik harness use [J].
Hedequist, D ;
Kasser, J ;
Emans, J .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS, 2003, 23 (02) :175-177