Understanding participant actions in OR interventions using practice theories: A research agenda

被引:7
作者
Ormerod, Richard [1 ]
Yearworth, Mike [2 ,3 ]
White, Leroy [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, England
[2] Univ Exeter, Exeter EX4 4SZ, England
[3] Univ Exeter, Business Sch, Exeter EX4 4ST, England
关键词
Decision Processes; Process of OR; Social Theory; Interpretivism; Practice Theory; PROBLEM-STRUCTURING METHODS; BEHAVIORAL OPERATIONAL-RESEARCH; GROUP DECISION; BOUNDARY GAMES; MANAGEMENT; CONSTRUCTION; HISTORY; SCIENCE; SYSTEM; FUTURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejor.2022.08.030
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Practice theory is a collective concept embodying a group of social theories that take practice, in other words actions , as the central focus of their theorising. In this paper we examine the intellectual devel-opment of practice theory, highlighting the importance of the key ideas that have shaped thinking on organisational activities and show their relevance to OR. In particular, we examine the social theories that OR researchers have adopted, what data was captured, and how it was analysed in order to establish empirical grounding in case studies involving workshops and meetings published by OR researchers. The cases thus provide a useful empirical basis for comparison to outline the prospects for the use of prac-tice theories by OR academic researchers. Finally, we propose an agenda to advance the understanding of practice theories and their contribution to the theory and practice of OR.(c) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ )
引用
收藏
页码:810 / 827
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Spiritual leadership:current status and Agenda for future research and practice [J].
Oh, Jihye ;
Wang, Jia .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SPIRITUALITY & RELIGION, 2020, 17 (03) :223-248
[22]   Advancing the theory and practice of impact assessment: Setting the research agenda [J].
Pope, Jenny ;
Bond, Alan ;
Morrison-Saunders, Angus ;
Retief, Francois .
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2013, 41 :1-9
[23]   Blockchain research, practice and policy: Applications, benefits, limitations, emerging research themes and research agenda [J].
Hughes, Laurie ;
Dwivedi, Yogesh K. ;
Misra, Santosh K. ;
Rana, Nripendra P. ;
Raghavan, Vishnupriya ;
Akella, Viswanadh .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 2019, 49 :114-129
[24]   Understanding the Life Cycles of Entrepreneurial Teams and Their Ventures: An Agenda for Future Research [J].
Patzelt, Holger ;
Preller, Rebecca ;
Breugst, Nicola .
ENTREPRENEURSHIP THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2021, 45 (05) :1119-1153
[25]   Understanding governance in the digital era: An agenda for public administration research in Canada [J].
Clarke, Amanda ;
Lindquist, Evert A. ;
Roy, Jeffrey .
CANADIAN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION-ADMINISTRATION PUBLIQUE DU CANADA, 2017, 60 (04) :457-475
[26]   The role of motivation theories in knowledge sharing: an integrative theoretical reviews and future research agenda [J].
Thomas, Asha ;
Gupta, Vikas .
KYBERNETES, 2022, 51 (01) :116-140
[27]   Practice Approaches to the Digital Transformations of Diplomacy: Toward a New Research Agenda [J].
Hedling, Elsa ;
Bremberg, Niklas .
INTERNATIONAL STUDIES REVIEW, 2021, 23 (04) :1595-1618
[28]   Mending Disconnects in Cancer Care: Setting an Agenda for Research, Practice, and Policy [J].
Alfano, Catherine M. ;
Mayer, Deborah K. ;
Beckjord, Ellen ;
Ahern, David K. ;
Galioto, Michele ;
Sheldon, Lisa K. ;
Klesges, Lisa M. ;
Aronoff-Spencer, Eliah ;
Hesse, Bradford W. .
JCO CLINICAL CANCER INFORMATICS, 2020, 4 :539-546
[29]   Author-itative interpretation in understanding accounting practice through case research [J].
De Loo, Ivo ;
Lowe, Alan .
MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2012, 23 (01) :3-16
[30]   Using Wise Interventions to Motivate Deliberate Practice [J].
Eskreis-Winkler, Lauren ;
Shulman, Elizabeth P. ;
Young, Victoria ;
Tsukayama, Eli ;
Brunwasser, Steven M. ;
Duckworth, Angela L. .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 111 (05) :728-744