Policy learning and change during crisis: COVID-19 policy responses across six statesPalabras Clave(sic)(sic)(sic)

被引:28
作者
Crow, Deserai A. [1 ]
DeLeo, Rob A. [2 ]
Albright, Elizabeth A. [3 ]
Taylor, Kristin [4 ]
Birkland, Tom [5 ]
Zhang, Manli [1 ]
Koebele, Elizabeth [6 ]
Jeschke, Nathan [1 ]
Shanahan, Elizabeth A. [7 ]
Cage, Caleb [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Sch Publ Affairs, Denver, CO 80202 USA
[2] Bentley Univ, Dept Polit Sci, Waltham, MA 02452 USA
[3] Duke Univ, Nicholas Sch Environm, Durham, NC USA
[4] Wayne State Univ, Dept Polit Sci, Detroit, MI USA
[5] North Carolina State Univ, Dept Publ Adm, Raleigh, NC USA
[6] Univ Nevada, Dept Polit Sci, Reno, NV 89557 USA
[7] Montana State Univ, Dept Polit Sci, Bozeman, MT 59717 USA
关键词
COVID-19; policy change; policy learning; state policymaking; PUBLIC-POLICY; EXPERIENCE; DISASTER; FAILURE; LESSONS; EVENTS; STATE;
D O I
10.1111/ropr.12511
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Whereas policy change is often characterized as a gradual and incremental process, effective crisis response necessitates that organizations adapt to evolving problems in near real time. Nowhere is this dynamic more evident than in the case of COVID-19, which forced subnational governments to constantly adjust and recalibrate public health and disease mitigation measures in the face of changing patterns of viral transmission and the emergence of new information. This study assesses (a) the extent to which subnational policies changed over the course of the pandemic; (b) whether these changes are emblematic of policy learning; and (c) the drivers of these changes, namely changing political and public health conditions. Using a novel dataset analyzing each policy's content, including its timing of enactment, substantive focus, stringency, and similar variables, results indicate the pandemic response varied significantly across states. The states examined were responsive to both changing public health and political conditions. This study identifies patterns of preemptive policy learning, which denotes learning in anticipation of an emerging hazard. In doing so, the study provides important insights into the dynamics of policy learning and change during disaster.
引用
收藏
页码:10 / 35
页数:26
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]   Capacity Building toward Resilience: How Communities Recover, Learn, and Change in the Aftermath of Extreme Events [J].
Albright, Elizabeth A. ;
Crow, Deserai A. .
POLICY STUDIES JOURNAL, 2021, 49 (01) :89-122
[2]   Learning processes, public and stakeholder engagement: Analyzing responses to Colorado's extreme flood events of 2013 [J].
Albright, Elizabeth A. ;
Crow, Deserai A. .
URBAN CLIMATE, 2015, 14 :79-93
[3]  
Baumgartner Frank R., 2005, The Politics of Attention. How Government Prioritizes Problems
[4]  
Baumgartner Frank R., 2010, AGENDAS INSTABILITY
[5]  
Birkland T.A., 2006, LESSONS DISASTER
[6]  
Birkland T.A., 1997, After Disaster: Agenda-Setting, Public Policy and Focusing Events
[7]  
Birkland T. A., 2004, Review of Policy Research, V21, P179, DOI [DOI 10.1111/J.1541-1338.2004.00068.X, 10.1111/j.1541-1338.2004.00068.x]
[8]   Learning and policy improvement after disaster - The case of aviation security [J].
Birkland, TA .
AMERICAN BEHAVIORAL SCIENTIST, 2004, 48 (03) :341-364
[9]  
Birkland Thomas., 1998, Journal of Public Policy, V18, P53, DOI [DOI 10.1017/S0143814X98000038, 10.1017/S0143814X98000038]
[10]   Governing in a Polarized Era: Federalism and the Response of US State and Federal Governments to the COVID-19 Pandemic [J].
Birkland, Thomas A. ;
Taylor, Kristin ;
Crow, Deserai A. ;
DeLeo, Rob .
PUBLIUS-THE JOURNAL OF FEDERALISM, 2021, 51 (04) :650-672