Accuracy of the PEARL-DGS Formula for Intraocular Lens Power Calculation in Post-Myopic Laser Refractive Corneal Surgery Eyes

被引:3
作者
Oh, Richul [1 ,2 ]
Hyon, Joon young
Jeon, Hyun sun [3 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
IN-SITU KERATOMILEUSIS; PREDICTION; CATARACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajo.2023.10.020
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To investigate the accuracy of the PEARL-DGS formula for intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation in post-myopic laser refractive corneal surgery eyes.DESIGN: Retrospective case series.METHODS: A total of 139 eyes of 139 patients (mean axial length: 27.4 +/- 2.1 mm) who had prior myopic laser refractive corneal surgery and subsequent cataract surgery using Tecnis ZCB00 from March 2018 to February 2023 were included. Refractive outcomes of 5 formulas (Barrett True K, Haigis-L, Hoffer-QST, PEARL-DGS, and Shammas-PL) were evaluated. Prediction error was defined as the difference between the measured and predicted postoperative refractive spherical equivalent using the IOL power actually implanted. Mean prediction error (MPE), median absolute prediction error (MedAE), and mean absolute prediction error were calculated.RESULTS: Without constant optimization, the PEARL-DGS resulted in a MPE of +0.05 +/- 0.65 diopters (D), whereas the other formulas resulted in myopic shifts. The MedAEs of the formulas were 0.39, 0.53, 0.65, 0.85, and 1.11 D for the PEARL-DGS, Hoffer-QST, Barrett True K, Shammas-PL, and Haigis-L, respectively, in order of magnitude (P < .05). With constant optimization, there were no statistically significant differences in the MedAEs among the 5 formulas (P = .388).CONCLUSIONS: In comparison to other IOL formulas, the PEARL-DGS resulted in better refractive outcomes after cataract surgery in post-myopic laser refractive corneal surgery eyes without constant optimization. We suggest that PEARL-DGS be considered as the first choice for IOL power calculation in these eyes when the clinicians do not have their optimized constants.
引用
收藏
页码:79 / 87
页数:9
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Accuracy of the Barrett True-K formula for intraocular lens power prediction after laser in situ keratomileusis or photorefractive keratectomy for myopia [J].
Abulafia, Adi ;
Hill, Warren E. ;
Koch, Douglas D. ;
Wang, Li ;
Barrett, Graham D. .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2016, 42 (03) :363-369
[2]  
Ambrosio Renato Jr, 2003, Semin Ophthalmol, V18, P2, DOI 10.1076/soph.18.1.2.14074
[3]   Intraocular lens power calculation after corneal refractive surgery: Double-K method [J].
Aramberri, J .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2003, 29 (11) :2063-2068
[5]  
Cho Kyuyeon, 2018, Korean J Ophthalmol, V32, P497, DOI 10.3341/kjo.2018.0008
[6]   The PEARL-DGS Formula: The Development of an Open-source Machine Learning-based Thick IOL Calculation Formula [J].
Debellemaniere, Guillaume ;
Dubois, Mathieu ;
Gauvin, Mathieu ;
Wallerstein, Avi ;
Brenner, Luis F. ;
Rampat, Radhika ;
Saad, Alain ;
Gatinel, Damien .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2021, 232 :58-69
[7]   Intraocular lens calculation after refractive surgery for myopia: Haigis-L formula [J].
Haigis, Wolfgang .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2008, 34 (10) :1658-1663
[8]  
Hamilton D Rex, 2003, Curr Opin Ophthalmol, V14, P44, DOI 10.1097/00055735-200302000-00008
[9]   Accuracy of Corneal Power Measurements for Intraocular Lens Power Calculation after Myopic Laser In situ Keratomileusis [J].
Helaly, Hany A. ;
El-Hifnawy, Mohammad A. M. ;
Shaheen, Mohamed Shafik ;
Abou El-Kheir, Amr F. .
MIDDLE EAST AFRICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2016, 23 (01) :122-128
[10]   Update on Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Study Protocols The Better Way to Design and Report Clinical Trials [J].
Hoffer, Kenneth J. ;
Savini, Giacomo .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2021, 128 (11) :E115-E120